Hillary Clinton Will Be in Jail by TOMORROW if Rand Paul Is Right!
- Thread starter Mordan
- Start date
Origanalist
Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,054
Of course he's right. To bad he dissed the Donald so now he's irrelevant.
Origanalist
Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,054
Just not a alpha male, low energy.
Actually, he was smart not to go never Trump. That would've ruined his career. A guy like Ryan or McCain can get away with it with their establishment support, but Rand would've been finished.
Anybody that thinks she has a medical condition are fringe conspiracy theorists, until it is time for her to report for her first term in prison. Then they are compassionate human beings.
Check my post history. There was a time I talked about the black plight in America, and even got into a long discussion with ACPTulsa about black wall street and such. When I have talked here about black people being shot by cops, guess what side I was on. I still think Zimmerman should be in jail, Freddie Gray was a travesty, Garner was murdered for selling single cigarettes, and it is a travesty no policeman has ever gone to prison for killing a black man. We even both chose a book to read on the subject, and then discussed it. I think it actually changed his mind about black America. I have taken two African-American history courses, love the Black Panthers, and keep myself up to date on what the Nation of Islam has to say. (it is clear, Farrakhan likes Trump way better than Hillary, BTW.)
You have no idea what you are talking about. Is Trump using islamophobia to advance his cause? Yes he is. Am I worried about it? Yes, in fact, I am worried abotu a lot of things about him. But really, every time I read a post like yours, I hope he wins more. I am so sick of people like you. I am sick of it. And if Trump takes America into some disastrous wars... I don't care. Hillary would have too, but at least trump did it with Americans raising a big middle finger to people like you on the way down, instead of a bunch of people afraid to crack a joke at work because the thought police are around the corner.
Most forums have become like this. They ban everybody they disagree with, using selective enforcement of their rules. It's just like the delusional MSM. I lurk in some forums, where they have one trump guy and 50 shillary people, because over the years they have banned all dissent. And they are still quite delusional. They know nothing about anything, except their empty platitudes. So when Comey said the investigation was still ongoing, they went into shocked conniptions. then they said it would not hurt hillary, unaware of the slow trickle of corruption leaks from wiklileaks, that set her up for a major tumble in the polls.
So Nov 9, after Trump wins big, many are literally going to be committing suicide.
I again say I am predicting a suicide wave of 10 - 30,000 people after the election in the first month.
Last edited:
14% of black people from North Carolina are voting Trump
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=c53f5b9f-0247-4298-8c4f-248026025511
I'd bet it is even higher come election day. Just youtube black trump supporters. These aren't your usual middle class Black republicans.
asurfaholic
Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2011
- Messages
- 5,156
Because he is insulting everyone who won't vote trump by calling them purists, among other things. Condescending little prick if you ask me. I mean, look at the OP and his attitude towards Rand Paul. Fuck that little slimeball.
I wouldn't call them "purists", just Hillary shills and morons who buy into the propaganda.
Most real libertarians are indeed strategically voting Trump (at least in battleground states) in order to block Hillary, because they recognize that if Hillary is elected, wars will ensue, the SCOTUS will be liberal for the next 25 years (buh-bye 2A), agenda 21/2030, globalism (not the RP kind), etc, etc..
asurfaholic
Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2011
- Messages
- 5,156
I wouldn't call them "purists", just Hillary shills and morons who buy into the propaganda.
Most real libertarians are indeed strategically voting Trump (at least in battleground states) in order to block Hillary, because they recognize that if Hillary is elected, wars will ensue, the SCOTUS will be liberal for the next 25 years (buh-bye 2A), agenda 21/2030, globalism (not the RP kind), etc, etc..
I get most of your point. I really do.
But I believe Trump is a cut of the same cloth- only difference is that Hilary has been around longer so more stuff to dig up. I also feel that the election was rigged from the start as it has been for the last couple at least- media dictates who are contenders and who is not. I won't vote for their choices because it's all I have left to do. Pick one stink over the other? No thank you
Not interested in playing the game.
I will wait until Wikileaks drops how both parties systematically cheat the US population on a regular basis to control outcomes. I hope one day that the crimes point back to the criminality of the few who are pulling strings. George Soros should be held liable for all costs incurred to cities and local governments and citizens for his role in funding BLM.
I don't see trump as a fighter for my cause. I will not vote for him.
tod evans
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
- Messages
- 36,071
If they're all in DC that wouldn't be a bad thing....
Mordan
Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2008
- Messages
- 2,340
Blue Pilled Betas will be confused when Trump wins.
I never called [MENTION=849]jmdrake[/MENTION] anything because he is one of the few purists who stays logical and doesn't insult people. He brings arguments and I even upvoted him on occassions.
thoughtomator
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2012
- Messages
- 11,267
I wouldn't call them "purists", just Hillary shills and morons who buy into the propaganda.
Most real libertarians are indeed strategically voting Trump (at least in battleground states) in order to block Hillary, because they recognize that if Hillary is elected, wars will ensue, the SCOTUS will be liberal for the next 25 years (buh-bye 2A), agenda 21/2030, globalism (not the RP kind), etc, etc..
The beauty of the situation is that reasonable libertarians who realized Trump was the best bet available (after Rand dropped out) will now have influence and leverage in a Trump administration, while the childish anarchist crowd will be treated with the same contempt as their establishment NeverTrumper allies.
I once had some tolerance for anarchists; now I realize they are every bit as dangerous to liberty as are Communists, Fascists, or any other brand of totalitarianism. When the people need to band together for self-defense against a clear and unambiguous threat to all life on earth, anarchists run away, hide or turn traitor.
GunnyFreedom
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 32,882
If you are describing what Trump is selling as "liberty," then frankly sir you can keep it. Problem is I already know you lot won't leave me out of your 'paradise' any more than the Klintonistas would.
Natural Citizen
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2012
- Messages
- 16,463
What the heck's a Blue Pilled Beta? Jiminy crickets. Every time I learn all of the hip mumbo jumbo Internet words, you guys come up with something new. Good googly moogly.
Last edited:
Mordan
Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2008
- Messages
- 2,340
Yes. I entirely agree. I have come to completely ignore those childish brats when think they can have Pure Liberty served to them on a silver platter.
Look at the LP disaster. Their VP is pushing Clinton!! What a bunch of crooks.
Mordan
Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2008
- Messages
- 2,340
LOL. I supposed you would know, among all. I thought Nature's Law was your thing.
thoughtomator
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2012
- Messages
- 11,267
That's pretty much the reaction I would expect from a small child. Throwing a tantrum because you can't get everything you want.
No honest person could look at Trump vs. Clinton and not conclude that the latter will be far more destructive to liberty. There's not a liberty that can be named for which Trump is not superior to Clinton by a country mile.
It's sad to see that you have turned into a mental case and abandoned the cause of liberty. I'd call it ignorance or petulance but I know it's really cowardice - you are unwilling to take the risks necessary to achieve liberty, so you have made yourself the enemy of the imperfect.
Natural Citizen
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2012
- Messages
- 16,463
Eh, I'm learning as I go, man. And it ain't easy, let me tell ya. Everybody's a critic. Damned if you do and damned if you don't kind of deal. Heh.
CaptUSA
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 18,936
I consider myself an honest person. From a policy perspective based on evidence (not rhetoric), they seem fairly identical to me. So it really comes down to which one would be able to enact more of their anti-liberty destruction. In that, I'd say Trump could be even worse. Hillary would at least be up against an opposition party in power (hopefully) that would be trying to fundraise off of their obstruction to her agenda. Even Ron Paul has said as much - but I suppose he isn't being honest either??!
Listen, there is no way to win here. The best we can do is to vote for neither of them to remove any semblance of a mandate.
