Hey, Chuck Baldwin supporters!

[RonPaulVolunteer]

He has zero political experience.

Like Washington, Jefferson & Adams. Cool!

The guy is a pastor of some small community church.

So he understands the reals problems of the world. Cool.

He's a conspiracy theorist who sides with the 9/11 "truth" movement.

So he has a brain. Cool.

He believes women should be barred from serving in the military.

So he understand the woman should not be dragged into the political BS of ego driven men and their wars. Cool.

The guy is a theocrat who believes God has summoned him to run for President to stop the "New World Order" and "North American Union."

So you're a liar. Not cool.

Give me a break.

I think Baldwin is the one who needs a break. From your BS!!

VOTE CHUCK BALDWIN 2008

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Source please?

As to Dr. Chuck Baldwin's experience, he has been a political radio talk show host since 1994. The program is carried over 6 stations and several southern states.

Mike Savage started out about as small if not smaller.

He may be inexperienced, but he is very knowledgable about the issues and what is going on in this country.

The man has three doctorates. He hasn't delivered any babies, but he has more than earned his Dr. title.

His campaign has kept going with very little financial resources. His vice presidentcandidate, Darrell Castle and his wife personally work at the campaign headquarters here in Grand Rapids, MI. They answer the phones, help coordinate and recruit volunteers and take out the trash if need be. They go to speaking engagements when invited and are very concerned and knowledgable about the economic crisis of our country.

Why can't people here see what Ron Paul was really saying at the press conference? Check out the numbers he was quoting. You may have missed him pointing out that there are 68% of American citizens who are eligible to vote who do not vote, for what ever reason. We should be focusing on getting non-voters to vote for a third party that they have the closest affinity. This will show the two major parties the dissatisfaction of the citizenery. Hopefully we could sway some of the disgruntled democrats and republicans also. WE JUST NEED TO VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT OBAMA OR MCCAIN!

I personally will be voting for Dr. Chuck Baldwin or writing in Ron Paul. If I vote for Dr. Baldwin my vote will be tallied somewhere and someone will read it. If I write in Dr. Ron Paul, my heart will be happy and only I will know it.

Bestselling author-protectionist Jerome Corsi endorses Chuck Baldwin

Look at the Constitution Party's thoughts on free trade...

Tariffs are not only a constitutional source of revenue, but, wisely administered, are an aid to preservation of the national economy. Since the adoption of the 1934 Trade Agreements Act, the United States government has engaged in a free trade policy which has destroyed or endangered important segments of our domestic agriculture and industry, undercut the wages of our working men and women, and totally destroyed or shipped abroad the jobs of hundreds of thousands of workers. This free trade policy is being used to foster socialism in America through welfare and subsidy programs.

Just a sampler.

http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php#Tariffs and Trade

 

[me3]

Bestselling author-protectionist Jerome Corsi endorses Chuck Baldwin

Look at the Constitution Party's thoughts on free trade...



Just a sampler.

http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php#Tariffs and Trade

Chuck Baldwin is almost completely running on Ron Paul's platform. Ron Paul if he took the LP nomination, would not be running on the LP platform, but Ron Paul's platform.

There are a lot of Baldwin haters who continue to spread misinformation about him. Whatever the CP platform is, Baldwin represents Ron Paul politics and philosophy, and that in my opinion, is worth voting for, because Barr barely represents anything that Paul does. People are just voting for him because he has a higher profile.

You're a smart guy Joe, do you really believe that Barr has a Rothbardian approach on ethics or economy? Do you think he likes to kick it to Mises and Menger?

At best he's an Objectivist, which is not a Libertarian.

 

[pepperpete1]

Who in a third party will win?

Post of the Day, if the letter he wrote I read in another Thread is how he really feels then I can at least respect this man even where I disagree with him on some things

None of the third party candidates will win this election. Dr. Paul has asked us to vote for whichever one we have the closest affinity as a message to the major 2 parties, that we will not be supporting their platform(s), and they need to change it.

May God be with us for the next four years.

 

[jmdrake]

Baldwin is a joke. He has zero political experience. The guy is a pastor of some small community church. He's a conspiracy theorist who sides with the 9/11 "truth" movement. He believes women should be barred from serving in the military. The guy is a theocrat who believes God has summoned him to run for President to stop the "New World Order" and "North American Union."

Give me a break.

Uh...you do realize that you have just insulted Ron Paul? No, you're probably not that bright. Ron Paul also believes we need to stop the "New World Order" and the "North American Union" and even if you want to stick your head in the said and pretend those things don't exist...they do.

 

[jmdrake]

None of the third party candidates will win this election. Dr. Paul has asked us to vote for whichever one we have the closest affinity as a message to the major 2 parties, that we will not be supporting their platform(s), and they need to change it.

May God be with us for the next four years.

Exactly! And I've been saying this ever since Dr. Paul dropped out and Baldwin and Barr jumped in. Really all of this stupid cat herding over how best to divide up 1.5 million votes is pathetic. And I'm glad Dr. Paul even reached out to those on the left by inviting McKinney and Nader to the platform. That's what we need to be doing going forward, reaching out to people of all political stripes. Believe it or not people of all political stripes initially joined this rEVOLution.

Regards,

John M. Drake

 

[LJHudd]

Baldwin wrote some absolutely BRILLIANT articles while Ron Paul was running for President, articles that helped me immensely to explain to my family and friends why Ron Paul should get their vote.

I am voting for Baldwin - he's the only one left that I feel comfortable voting for, the closest one left who represents the statement I want to make with my vote in Nov.

Perhaps he's not registering on the polls because, perhaps, he isn't an option on said polls... I have not been polled yet by anyone have you?

 

[LJHudd]

Quote:
Originally Posted by pepperpete1 View Post
None of the third party candidates will win this election. Dr. Paul has asked us to vote for whichever one we have the closest affinity as a message to the major 2 parties, that we will not be supporting their platform(s), and they need to change it.

May God be with us for the next four years.

Exactly! And I've been saying this ever since Dr. Paul dropped out and Baldwin and Barr jumped in. Really all of this stupid cat herding over how best to divide up 1.5 million votes is pathetic. And I'm glad Dr. Paul even reached out to those on the left by inviting McKinney and Nader to the platform. That's what we need to be doing going forward, reaching out to people of all political stripes. Believe it or not people of all political stripes initially joined this rEVOLution.

Regards,

John M. Drake

Excellent posts. I love this rEVOLution.

 

[CurtisLow]

VOTE CHUCK BALDWIN 2008! Woot!

 

[azamalech]

Chuck Baldwin had my support for about a day after Barr imploded, but at this point I don't know how to vote...Baldwin's "truther" stances and all his talk about "bringing down the NWO" seem a little out there for me.

Perhaps a write in of Paul or a vote of no confidence is the way to go.

 

[Bradley in DC]

He is not a theocrat, he is a constitutionalist who believes in states' rights, and believes the best thing for religious communities is to get the federal government out of our lives. There is a huge difference.

States have rights? I thought God gave people rights.

 

[Kludge]

Chuck Baldwin had my support for about a day after Barr imploded, but at this point I don't know how to vote...Baldwin's "truther" stances and all his talk about "bringing down the NWO" seem a little out there for me.

Perhaps a write in of Paul or a vote of no confidence is the way to go.

I try not to diss Baldwin, but to be honest, I think 10% of RP supporters support Baldwin. (Thank you, Glenn Beck, for giving me such a great veiled reference!)

 

[gls]

States have rights? I thought God gave people rights.

Quick! Someone tell dixiecrat Bob Barr, who thinks people should be thrown in jail if he doesn't approve of the chemicals they choose to put into their body.

Of course, the federal government shouldn't be involved (unless it's to intervene in South America to fight "narco-terrorists", that is).

 

[Spirit of '76]

Chuck Baldwin had my support for about a day after Barr imploded, but at this point I don't know how to vote...Baldwin's "truther" stances and all his talk about "bringing down the NWO" seem a little out there for me.

I've never heard Baldwin say anything that would lead me to believe he's a Troofer.

As for his quoting Pat Buchanan on the NWO, I remember the thunderous applause Pat always got for that line. Great stuff.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Baldwin is a joke. He has zero political experience. The guy is a pastor of some small community church. He's a conspiracy theorist who sides with the 9/11 "truth" movement. He believes women should be barred from serving in the military. The guy is a theocrat who believes God has summoned him to run for President to stop the "New World Order" and "North American Union."

Give me a break.

I agree. Chuck Baldnut is: a protectionist, a statist, a theocrat, a parasite, a wannabe tyrant, a bible thumper; and Chuck Baldnut is a member of an ultra-nationalist / theocratic political organization.

I can go on and on about Chucky, but I think I've made my point of what I think of this guy.

I appreciate your analysis, abc123, hope to see more of it in the near-future.

 

[Bradley in DC]

P.S., Baldwin has registered exactly ZERO political support in the polls. He's not even on the map. He will be on barely enough state ballots to even have a *theoretical* chance of winning the Presidency.

To be fair, that's 0.1%
(actually, that is the highest I have ever seen him in the polls)

 

[Cowlesy]

I was going to vote for Barr before he had to just push his smug shitheaded'ness to the max.

Fortunately, I never gave him one single cent, probably like most of the actual Barr supporters on this board.

 

[ACUTS]

Bob Barr is a neo con stooge

I have to support Baldwin....


vote on this poll

http://whatreallyhappened.com/content/who-will-you-vote-coming-us-presidential-election


I would have voted LP had they not given this weasely opportunist ex CIA piece of garbage the top spot

I would have even preferred WAR, but Bob Barr??? ugh shudder.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

I have to support Baldwin....

You HAVE to, eh?

 

[amy31416]

JTL trying to sell Barr is like a dirty, smelly salesman trying to sell soap.