Hey, Chuck Baldwin supporters!

[aspiringconstitutionalist]

Nader.

I wouldn't vote for Nader in a million years, BUT... BUT...
Nader would be head and shoulders above Obama or McCain. ANYONE who will balance the budget, end the war, protect civil liberties, and go after the Federal Reserve would be a step in the right direction.

 

[abc123]

Nader
You're joking, right?

At least Ralph Nader had an actual record of career accomplishments and experience before running for President...

 

[SnappleLlama]

Sooo....who should we vote for, then?

 

[me3]

P.S., Baldwin has registered exactly ZERO political support in the polls. He's not even on the map. He will be on barely enough state ballots to even have a *theoretical* chance of winning the Presidency.

Well, based on this methodology, I guess it's Obama or McCain, right?

True, but he's running for President, not state representative or small town mayor.

You're an idiot.

I can understand people not liking the CP, but Baldwin is pretty much 99% Ron Paul, lockstep on pretty much every issue. He may talk about certain different points more, but I challenge anyone to conclusively point out where he differs from Ron Paul on any issues.

 

[H Roark]

Sadly, the CP is extremely Theocratic.

Sadly, you are misinformed.

You will see that throughout the CP platform the 10th amendment is frequently referenced (even in dealing with drugs and gambling)

The 10th Amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

 

[RPDelegate]

Actually Baldwin is on the ballot is nearly every state isn't he? I thought I just saw that today.

 

[Kludge]

Actually Baldwin is on the ballot is nearly every state isn't he? I thought I just saw that today.

Only 35, including unaffiliated parties which put him on. Nader will be on 44 (45 really...) and will be a write-in candidate just about everywhere else. http://www.ballot-access.org/ballot-chart.html

 

[RickyJ]

He's a conspiracy theorist who sides with the 9/11 "truth" movement..

Really?

I didn't know that.

If that is true you have given me yet another reason to vote for Chuck Baldwin this November.

 

[RickyJ]

Oh--and Baldwin has never endorsed the 9/11 Truther theories,he has only agreed that an Independent Commission should re-investigate it, same as Ron Paul.

Damn, I got my hopes up based on the OP's lie.

 

[RickyJ]

Bingo!

You don't think we know that? Few people actually believe Baldwin will really win the Presidency. What matters is standing up for your beliefs.

If you don't stand for something you will fall for anything.

 

[RickyJ]

If you believe you're voting for a president, you're a fool.

If you are voting and you vote in the presidential race then what do you think you're voting for if not the president?

Of course you are voting for the president in such a case. Now whether your vote counts or not is an entirely different matter altogether.

 

[Kludge]

If you are voting and you vote in the presidential race then what do you think you're voting for if not the president?

Of course you are voting for the president in such a case. Now whether your vote counts or not is an entirely different matter altogether.

What is a vote if not counted? What is a right if not recognized?


Nothing.


Unity can give some type of message of dissatisfaction, even if not our own. Do we need to be so radical? Can we not compromise? Gradualism?


The two-party system NEEDS to be broken, and I see no more useful an alternative then using Nader as a unified vote of no confidence.

 

[porcupine]

What is a vote if not counted? What is a right if not recognized?


Nothing.


Unity can give some type of message of dissatisfaction, even if not our own. Do we need to be so radical? Can we not compromise? Gradualism?


The two-party system NEEDS to be broken, and I see no more useful an alternative then using Nader as a unified vote of no confidence.

If you want a "unified" vote of no confidence, Barr is polling about 8 times higher than Nader.

 

[Kludge]

Barr is polling about 8 times higher than Nader.

Almost exclusively in the Zogby polls is Barr doing better then Nader, and those are the online polls.

 

[Dieseler]

P.S., Baldwin has registered exactly ZERO political support in the polls. He's not even on the map. He will be on barely enough state ballots to even have a *theoretical* chance of winning the Presidency.

Why are you worried enough about it to start this thread?
Booger eater.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Baldwin is a joke. He has zero political experience. The guy is a pastor of some small community church. He's a conspiracy theorist who sides with the 9/11 "truth" movement. He believes women should be barred from serving in the military. The guy is a theocrat who believes God has summoned him to run for President to stop the "New World Order" and "North American Union."

Give me a break.

I agree he also wants to ban porn and is a protectionist! yikes

 

[dawnbt]

Baldwin is a joke. He has zero political experience. The guy is a pastor of some small community church. He's a conspiracy theorist who sides with the 9/11 "truth" movement. He believes women should be barred from serving in the military. The guy is a theocrat who believes God has summoned him to run for President to stop the "New World Order" and "North American Union."

Give me a break.

I'm a christian, a truther, don't want to fight, and all for stopping the NWO and NAU. Sounds good to me.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

If you are voting and you vote in the presidential race then what do you think you're voting for if not the president?

Of course you are voting for the president in such a case. Now whether your vote counts or not is an entirely different matter altogether.

You are voting for electors to be sent to the electoral college. The constitution does not allow for direct election of a president. Back to civics class with you, my friend!

 

[pepperpete1]

Experience?

I agree he also wants to ban porn and is a protectionist! yikes

Source please?

As to Dr. Chuck Baldwin's experience, he has been a political radio talk show host since 1994. The program is carried over 6 stations and several southern states.

Mike Savage started out about as small if not smaller.

He may be inexperienced, but he is very knowledgable about the issues and what is going on in this country.

The man has three doctorates. He hasn't delivered any babies, but he has more than earned his Dr. title.

His campaign has kept going with very little financial resources. His vice presidentcandidate, Darrell Castle and his wife personally work at the campaign headquarters here in Grand Rapids, MI. They answer the phones, help coordinate and recruit volunteers and take out the trash if need be. They go to speaking engagements when invited and are very concerned and knowledgable about the economic crisis of our country.

Why can't people here see what Ron Paul was really saying at the press conference? Check out the numbers he was quoting. You may have missed him pointing out that there are 68% of American citizens who are eligible to vote who do not vote, for what ever reason. We should be focusing on getting non-voters to vote for a third party that they have the closest affinity. This will show the two major parties the dissatisfaction of the citizenery. Hopefully we could sway some of the disgruntled democrats and republicans also. WE JUST NEED TO VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT OBAMA OR MCCAIN!

I personally will be voting for Dr. Chuck Baldwin or writing in Ron Paul. If I vote for Dr. Baldwin my vote will be tallied somewhere and someone will read it. If I write in Dr. Ron Paul, my heart will be happy and only I will know it.

 

[Melissa]

Source please?

As to Dr. Chuck Baldwin's experience, he has been a political radio talk show host since 1994. The program is carried over 6 stations and several southern states.

Mike Savage started out about as small if not smaller.

He may be inexperienced, but he is very knowledgable about the issues and what is going on in this country.

The man has three doctorates. He hasn't delivered any babies, but he has more than earned his Dr. title.

His campaign has kept going with very little financial resources. His vice presidentcandidate, Darrell Castle and his wife personally work at the campaign headquarters here in Grand Rapids, MI. They answer the phones, help coordinate and recruit volunteers and take out the trash if need be. They go to speaking engagements when invited and are very concerned and knowledgable about the economic crisis of our country.

Why can't people here see what Ron Paul was really saying at the press conference? Check out the numbers he was quoting. You may have missed him pointing out that there are 68% of American citizens who are eligible to vote who do not vote, for what ever reason. We should be focusing on getting non-voters to vote for a third party that they have the closest affinity. This will show the two major parties the dissatisfaction of the citizenery. Hopefully we could sway some of the disgruntled democrats and republicans also. WE JUST NEED TO VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT OBAMA OR MCCAIN!

I personally will be voting for Dr. Chuck Baldwin or writing in Ron Paul. If I vote for Dr. Baldwin my vote will be tallied somewhere and someone will read it. If I write in Dr. Ron Paul, my heart will be happy and only I will know it.

Post of the Day, if the letter he wrote I read in another Thread is how he really feels then I can at least respect this man even where I disagree with him on some things