Herman Cain Herman Cain: Planned Parenthood is Plotting Genocide Against 'Black Babies'

doodle

Banned
Joined
Dec 10, 2010
Messages
2,939
I felt little bad for him when Herman Cain was called Uncle Tom by libs ( LINK ) but after reading his bigoted statement about not appointing any jews muslims in his hallucinated Presidential cabinet after winning GOP nomination and the Presidency ( lolz ), googled his name and came across some interesting stuff.


Herman Cain: Planned Parenthood is Plotting Genocide Against 'Black Babies'

hermancainpamelageller.jpg

Herman Cain poses with hate monger Pamela Geller

LINK

After a quick look he comes across as an opportunist bigot. Am I'm mistaken and this guy actually believes in basic human liberty principles?


If there are any supporters of this buy here, can someone explain what do these comments mean?

Quick CPAC thoughts Thursday morning
February 11, 2011

When Newt Gringrich came into the room the MSM waved around him, When Herman Cain came into the room the bloggers waved around him, that tell you an awful lot.

There are an inordinate amount of charming young women here that I would like to introduce to my sons.

last-thurs-014.jpg


If you want to be noticed by the media, dress in colonial garb.


http://datechguy.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/quick-cpac-thoughts-thursday-morning/
 
Last edited:
Herman Cain: Planned Parenthood is Plotting Genocide Against 'Black Babies'

Maafa 21: Black Genocide In the 21st Century



MAAFA 21 is a very carefully reasoned, well-produced exposé of the abortion industry, racism and eugenics. It proves through innumerable sources that many founders of Planned Parenthood and other parts of the abortion movement were interested in killing off the black race in America and elsewhere.​



2010 - "Maafa 21" Exposes Black Genocide
Mark Crutcher of Life Dynamics is producer of the documentary Maafa 21: Black Genocide in 21st Century America, an explosive exposé of the racist eugenics agenda of the abortion industry in the United States. By Rebecca Terrell​

2010 - Pro-Life Billboards Highlight Eugenics
A new pro-life billboard campaign by the Radiance Foundation called Too Many Aborted is drawing attention by linking black abortions to eugenics promoter and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger. by Alex Newman​


endangered-billboard.jpg
 
Last edited:
I agree with him.

But Ron has been making better arguments against abortion for decades.
 
Again: Muslims are followers of Islam; they are not a racial group.

Depends on the context; I think unlike Jesus believers, muslims and jews can be races too depending on the blood connection of father or mother.
 
Arabs and Hebrews are races. So are Persians.

Quick quiz: Which was Mohammed Ali?
 
If there are any supporters of this buy here, can someone explain what do these comments mean?

Quick CPAC thoughts Thursday morning
February 11, 2011

When Newt Gringrich came into the room the MSM waved around him, When Herman Cain came into the room the bloggers waved around him, that tell you an awful lot.

There are an inordinate amount of charming young women here that I would like to introduce to my sons.

If you want to be noticed by the media, dress in colonial garb.


http://datechguy.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/quick-cpac-thoughts-thursday-morning/

Still do not understamd the gist of above comments but there is an interesting Politico piece on Herman Cain's take on race and segregation and drinking the "white" water:

Political Insider
Herman Cain on drinking the ‘white’ water in a segregated Atlanta

March 24, 2011

A nicely done Herman Cain video, explaining – in a phone interview with a reporter from the Daily Caller – what it was like to grow up in segregated Atlanta:

Said Cain, while on the road in Iowa:

“We were at the bargain basement at the department store one day, and my Mom was looking on a rack to get some stuff for us. We asked her if we could go get some water. She said yes. And Mom specifically said, ‘Now, y’all make sure y’all drink out of the “colored” fountain.’

“Being typical young boys, we got over there and looked at those two water fountains, and we kind of looked around. And we kind of went, hmm, nobody’s looking.

“So my brother went first, while I stayed on the look-out, to sip the ‘white’ water. Then he was on the look-out while I sipped the ‘white’ water. Then we both sipped the colored water. We looked at each other [and said], ‘The water tastes the same. What’s the big deal?’”

http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insi...?cxntfid=blogs_political_insider_jim_galloway
 
Last edited:
Still do not understamd the gist of above comments but there is an interesting Politico piece on Herman Cain's take on race and segregation and drinking the "white" water:

Your point?
 
Last edited:
You're point?

Herman Cain will be in better position to say but it appears he was against separate water coolers of colonial days.

I'm trying to understand "If you want to be noticed by the media, dress in colonial garb." comment in CPAC story.
 
I felt little bad for him when Herman Cain was called Uncle Tom by libs ( LINK ) but after reading his bigoted statement about not appointing any jews muslims in his hallucinated Presidential cabinet after winning GOP nomination and the Presidency ( lolz ), googled his name and came across some interesting stuff.


Herman Cain: Planned Parenthood is Plotting Genocide Against 'Black Babies'

hermancainpamelageller.jpg

Herman Cain poses with hate monger Pamela Geller

LINK

After a quick look he comes across as an opportunist bigot. Am I'm mistaken and this guy actually believes in basic human liberty principles?


If there are any supporters of this buy here, can someone explain what do these comments mean?

Quick CPAC thoughts Thursday morning
February 11, 2011

When Newt Gringrich came into the room the MSM waved around him, When Herman Cain came into the room the bloggers waved around him, that tell you an awful lot.

There are an inordinate amount of charming young women here that I would like to introduce to my sons.

last-thurs-014.jpg


If you want to be noticed by the media, dress in colonial garb.


http://datechguy.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/quick-cpac-thoughts-thursday-morning/

1) What's wrong with not wanting any Muslims in his cabinet?
2) I think we better be careful about using as an argument against a candidate that he once posed for a picture with a bigot.
3) What's wrong with charging Planned Parenthood with genocide against black babies?
 
1) What's wrong with not wanting any Muslims in his cabinet?
2) I think we better be careful about using as an argument against a candidate that he once posed for a picture with a bigot.
3) What's wrong with charging Planned Parenthood with genocide against black babies?

1- His view suggests mind of a bigot or racist. In reality it's probably "abused child" syndrome or "separate water cooler" syndrome or trying to please his audience.
Would this even be a question if he said he won't have a Jew or Catholic in his cabinet?

2- One bigot in a picture can be non story, two bigots in a pictire can be another matter

3- What about "white babies" , they are not being genocided? His claim creates the impression that abortions are targeted at genocide of "black"babies as some sort of race war, do you agree with that? Have not found his views on bombing of Iraq/Libya/Iran yet, if he supports such elective bloodshed, he could be accused of hypocrisy too.
 
Last edited:
1- His view suggests mind of a bigot or racist. In reality it's probably "abused child" syndrome or "separate water cooler" syndrome or trying to please his audience.
Would this even be a question if he said he won't have a Jew or Catholic in his cabinet?

2- One bigot in a picture can be non story, two bigots in a pictire can be another matter

3- What about "white babies" , they are not being genocided? His claim creates the impression that abortions are targeted at genocide of "black"babies as some sort of race war, do you agree with that? Have not found his views on bombing of Iraq/Libya/Iran yet, if he supports such elective bloodshed, he could be accused of hypocrisy too.

Black people were specifically targeted by Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood. He is right on this.
 
1- His view suggests mind of a bigot or racist. In reality it's probably "abused child" syndrome or "separate water cooler" syndrome or trying to please his audience.
Would this even be a question if he said he won't have a Jew or Catholic in his cabinet?

2- One bigot in a picture can be non story, two bigots in a pictire can be another matter

3- What about "white babies" , they are not being genocided? His claim creates the impression that abortions are targeted at genocide of "black"babies as some sort of race war, do you agree with that? Have not found his views on bombing of Iraq/Libya/Iran yet, if he supports such elective bloodshed, he could be accused of hypocrisy too.

1.) Herman Cain is not a Racist.

2.) Silly name calling.

3.) Research Margaret Sanger, the First President and Founder of Planned Parenthood. She was a Racist and supported Eugenics.


Watch Maafa 21 when you get a chance.
 
Last edited:
1) What's wrong with not wanting any Muslims in his cabinet?

What's right with it?

The Constitution, article VI, section three: ...no religious test shall ever be required as qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Is a cabinet position a public trust?
 
What's right with it?

The Constitution, article VI, section three: ...no religious test shall ever be required as qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Is a cabinet position a public trust?

Is Herman Cain not allowed to choose his cabinet members?
 
Last edited:
Is Herman Cain not allowed to choose his cabinet members?

Of course not. He isn't president. All he's free to choose is what to put in his cabinets.

If you're asking if a president-elect is free to disregard and even trample on the Constitution when he selects his Cabinet, the answer is yes. He can even disregard and trample on it when he decides to kick the ass of some Mediterranean nonentity. Doesn't mean I have to support it or like it.
 
Of course not. He isn't president. All he's free to choose is what to put in his cabinets.

If you're asking if a president-elect is free to disregard and even trample on the Constitution when he selects his Cabinet, the answer is yes. He can even disregard and trample on it when he decides to kick the ass of some Mediterranean nonentity. Doesn't mean I have to support it or like it.


You're warping the Constitution.

Herman Cain is allowed to choose his cabinet members.
 
Back
Top