FluffyUnbound
Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Messages
- 661
http://www.boston.com/news/daily/23/globepoll.pdf
In their poll today of NH, they give Paul 8%. [Page 41]
But their sample assumes that SIX TIMES as many registered Republicans as independents will vote in the primary.
Out of the 329 registered Republicans in the sample, Paul got 6% or 20 votes.
Out of the 65 independents in the sample, Paul got 17% or 11 votes.
But there's just no way the total vote will break down that way.
Historically it's more likely that there will be almost an even split among the voters between registered and independent.
If you normalize for this, Paul would draw around 12%. If you also normalize the other candidate totals, Paul would be in third.
It's BS.
In their poll today of NH, they give Paul 8%. [Page 41]
But their sample assumes that SIX TIMES as many registered Republicans as independents will vote in the primary.
Out of the 329 registered Republicans in the sample, Paul got 6% or 20 votes.
Out of the 65 independents in the sample, Paul got 17% or 11 votes.
But there's just no way the total vote will break down that way.
Historically it's more likely that there will be almost an even split among the voters between registered and independent.
If you normalize for this, Paul would draw around 12%. If you also normalize the other candidate totals, Paul would be in third.
It's BS.