Helping Code Pink "More Proof Ron Paul Supporters Are Not Conservative"

pcosmar said:
They are Anti-War. They were Anti-War when Bush was President.. and the "R"s hated them.
They are Anti-War while Obama is president.

The Veterans Against the War were Anti-War when Bush was President,, But when they were joined by Code Pink in protests they suddenly became "bad guys"..

So tell me who is controlled and who is opposition?

I am damn tired or the wars,, Am I controlled opposition? Is Ron Paul,,? he has been against them from the beginning.
Click to expand...

Not sure what your point is there. Do you know what controlled opposition is?
 
PatriotOne said:
Not sure what your point is there. Do you know what controlled opposition is?
Click to expand...

Yes I think I do.. That would be the Romney Rah Rah section here.

That would be the several Tea Party groups that co-opted the Liberty movement. and stole the Tea Party name.
 
PatriotOne said:
Sigh......

I sure wish everyone knew how to recognize controlled opposition.

Code Pink is your typical "controlled opposition" organization.
Click to expand...

I would probably agree with you here but that might be a bias on my part as I dislike some of their goals. To be fair though, most major groups probably have infiltrators now and are in danger of furthering goals counter productive to their original intent. Not much different than what many of us suggest doing by using the organizations to further goals of liberty. Even if a group isn't compromised the msm spins things to appear in a manner that furthers a passive, controlled society and that squeaky wheels are dangerous kooks. This is why parents educating their children (and themselves) to embrace a thought pattern outside of that which is being so heavily promoted is one of the highest priorities imo. Everything nowadays seems to be some exercise in peer pressure.
 
fr33 said:
Good. Now that there is no longer an anti-war candidate running, the only way to be heard is to stand up and shout.

This isn't a football game. People are dying.
Click to expand...

Politics is a game, however.
 
torchbearer said:
Ron works with Kucinich, therefore ron is a progressive libtard.
Click to expand...

It's largely the misleading rhetoric. Pat Buchanan was friends with both Gore Vidal and Ralph Nader yet never came across as weak or left-leaning to potential voters. That seems to be why Ron & his supporters are typecasted.
 
Last edited:
AuH20 said:
It's largely the misleading rhetoric. Pat Buchanan was friends with both Gore Vidal and Ralph Nader yet never came across as weak or left-leaning to potential voters. That seems to be why Ron & his supporters are typecasted.
Click to expand...


just giving an example of how associated doesn't equate into idealogical changes.
 
AuH20 said:
It's largely the misleading rhetoric. Pat Buchanan was friends with both Gore Vidal and Ralph Nader yet never came across as weak or left-leaning to potential voters. That seems to be why Ron & his supporters are typecasted.
Click to expand...
It doesn't help when so many Ron Paul supporters say they hate Conservatives and Republicans. When Conservatives and Republicans reject Ron Paul they start whining about being rejected.
 
FrankRep said:
It doesn't help when so many Ron Paul supporters say they hate Conservatives and Republicans. When Conservatives and Republicans reject Ron Paul they start whining about being rejected.
Click to expand...

Another problem is that RP supporters equate the corrupt GOP leadership with ALL of the GOP electorate. That's not the case. So they start lashing out at anyone and everyone. Secondly, there is an active faction that hate social conservatives with a passion. We're talking frothing at the mouth. On the other side, we have the mainstream republican voter who erroneously thinks all RP supporters are primarily driven by prostitution and marijuana issues, which makes for an untenable situation all around. It's like cats and dogs. There is alot of miscommunication fostered by the fringe actors on both sides.
 
Last edited:
Well spoken!


AuH20 said:
Another problem is that RP supporters equate the corrupt GOP leadership with ALL of the GOP electorate. That's not the case. So they start lashing out at anyone and everyone. Secondly, there is an active faction that hate social conservatives with a passion. We're talking frothing at the mouth. On the other side, we have the mainstream republican voter who erroneously thinks all RP supporters are primarily driven by prostitution and marijuana issues, which makes for an untenable situation all around. It's like cats and dogs. There is alot of miscommunication fostered by the fringe actors on both sides.
Click to expand...
 
Just a bit of info on the founder of Code Pink (controlled opposition). ....

Medea Benjamin (born Susan Benjamin on September 10, 1952) is an American political activist, best known for co-founding Code Pink.

Benjamin grew up in Long Island, New York, a self-described "nice Jewish girl."[1] During her freshman year at Tufts University, she renamed herself after the Greek mythological character Medea. She received master's degrees in public health from Columbia University and in economics from The New School.

The New School is renowned for its teaching, housing the international think tank, World Policy Institute.

The World Policy Institute

The World Policy Institute, a non-partisan center for progressive global policy analysis and thought leadership, focuses on complex challenges that demand cooperative solutions in an increasingly interdependent world: an inclusive and sustainable global market economy, engaged global civic participation and effective governance, and collaborative approaches to national and global security. WPI’s Fellows program, regular public and private events, collaborative policy development, media activities, and flagship World Policy Journal provide a forum for solution-focused policy analysis and public debate. Its programs seek to introduce fresh ideas and new voices from around the world on critical shared global issues including migration, climate change, technology, economic development, human rights, and counter-terrorism.

History

Founded in New York City in 1961 as the Fund for Education Concerning World Peace through World Law, the World Policy Institute has its origins in the post-World War II movement of moderate internationalists. Its founders—the banker Harry B. Hollins, and the banker and public servant C. Douglas Dillon inspired by the World Federalist thinker Grenville Clark—sought to develop international policies to prevent future carnage and devastation like what the world had just experienced. In 1963, the Institute’s name was shortened to World Law Fund. In 1972, it merged with the Institute for International Order, founded in 1948 and run by Earl D. Osborn. The combined organization adopted a new name, the Institute for World Order. In 1982, the World Policy Institute adopted its current name to reflect a shift from a primarily educational focus to incorporating a strong policy element, and founded World Policy Journal. From 1991-2007, the Institute was part of The New School, a university in Greenwich Village, New York City. In 2007, the World Policy Institute was re-incorporated as a free-standing institution, which works in active collaboration with like-minded organizations around the world.


Benjamin worked for 10 years as an economist and nutritionist in Latin America and Africa for the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, the World Health Organization, the Swedish International Development Agency, and the Institute for Food and Development Policy. She spent four years in Cuba, and has authored three books on the country.
 
PatriotOne said:
Just a bit of info on the founder of Code Pink (controlled opposition). ....

Medea Benjamin (born Susan Benjamin on September 10, 1952) is an American political activist, best known for co-founding Code Pink.

Benjamin grew up in Long Island, New York, a self-described "nice Jewish girl."[1] During her freshman year at Tufts University, she renamed herself after the Greek mythological character Medea. She received master's degrees in public health from Columbia University and in economics from The New School.

The New School is renowned for its teaching, housing the international think tank, World Policy Institute.

The World Policy Institute

The World Policy Institute, a non-partisan center for progressive global policy analysis and thought leadership, focuses on complex challenges that demand cooperative solutions in an increasingly interdependent world: an inclusive and sustainable global market economy, engaged global civic participation and effective governance, and collaborative approaches to national and global security. WPI’s Fellows program, regular public and private events, collaborative policy development, media activities, and flagship World Policy Journal provide a forum for solution-focused policy analysis and public debate. Its programs seek to introduce fresh ideas and new voices from around the world on critical shared global issues including migration, climate change, technology, economic development, human rights, and counter-terrorism.

History

Founded in New York City in 1961 as the Fund for Education Concerning World Peace through World Law, the World Policy Institute has its origins in the post-World War II movement of moderate internationalists. Its founders—the banker Harry B. Hollins, and the banker and public servant C. Douglas Dillon inspired by the World Federalist thinker Grenville Clark—sought to develop international policies to prevent future carnage and devastation like what the world had just experienced. In 1963, the Institute’s name was shortened to World Law Fund. In 1972, it merged with the Institute for International Order, founded in 1948 and run by Earl D. Osborn. The combined organization adopted a new name, the Institute for World Order. In 1982, the World Policy Institute adopted its current name to reflect a shift from a primarily educational focus to incorporating a strong policy element, and founded World Policy Journal. From 1991-2007, the Institute was part of The New School, a university in Greenwich Village, New York City. In 2007, the World Policy Institute was re-incorporated as a free-standing institution, which works in active collaboration with like-minded organizations around the world.


Benjamin worked for 10 years as an economist and nutritionist in Latin America and Africa for the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, the World Health Organization, the Swedish International Development Agency, and the Institute for Food and Development Policy. She spent four years in Cuba, and has authored three books on the country.
Click to expand...

scary resume
 
GeorgiaAvenger said:
In the future, this movement needs to stay away from organizations like Code Pink. Don't change your foreign policy views, but have some wisdom about hanging around hated organizations.
Click to expand...

Sure. I thnk we should stay away from the ACLU too, because they sometimes work for causes that we don't necessarily agree with. And the truthers. And the anti-vaxxers. And the war mongers. And and the anti-war crowd. And rich people. And fat people. And poor people.

Political isolationism, from the crowd that crows about free speech and free trade. Beautiful!
 
AuH20 said:
scary resume
Click to expand...

The connections of the founder of Code Pink with those working towards One World Government are a mile wide and a mile deep. Here's the President of the school she went to:

David E. Van Zandt - President of The New School

Dean Van Zandt graduated summa cum laude from Princeton University with a degree in sociology. He completed his Juris Doctor (J.D.) at Yale University, where he served as managing editor for the Yale Law Journal, and earned his Ph.D. in sociology at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Member of the Council on Foreign Relations

More info:

Code Pink is on the payroll of Winston Foundation, an organization linked to the National Endowment for Democracy, a documented CIA front, and connected as well to the Rockefeller Family Fund, the Carnegie Corporation, the Heinz Family Foundation, and the Soros Foundations. In 2003, Code Pink shared office space with the Institute for Policy Studies, an organization taking money from the Turner, Ford, MacArthur and Charles Stewart Mott foundations. The Ford Foundation is notorious for funding liberal organizations. It is connected to the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the CIA (see Alternative Media Censorship: Sponsored by CIA’s Ford Foundation?).
 
Last edited:
PatriotOne said:
The connections of the founder of Code Pink with those working towards One World Government are a mile wide and a mile deep. Here's the President of the school she went to:

David E. Van Zandt - President of The New School

Dean Van Zandt graduated summa cum laude from Princeton University with a degree in sociology. He completed his Juris Doctor (J.D.) at Yale University, where he served as managing editor for the Yale Law Journal, and earned his Ph.D. in sociology at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Member of the Council on Foreign Relations

More info:

Code Pink is on the payroll of Winston Foundation, an organization linked to the National Endowment for Democracy, a documented CIA front, and connected as well to the Rockefeller Family Fund, the Carnegie Corporation, the Heinz Family Foundation, and the Soros Foundations. In 2003, Code Pink shared office space with the Institute for Policy Studies, an organization taking money from the Turner, Ford, MacArthur and Charles Stewart Mott foundations. The Ford Foundation is notorious for funding liberal organizations. It is connected to the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the CIA (see Alternative Media Censorship: Sponsored by CIA’s Ford Foundation?).
Click to expand...

You are aware who's family was entrenched within the Ford Foundation??? :D Let's just say he's residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue as of this moment.
 
angelatc said:
Sure. I thnk we should stay away from the ACLU too, because they sometimes work for causes that we don't necessarily agree with. And the truthers. And the anti-vaxxers. And the war mongers. And and the anti-war crowd. And rich people. And fat people. And poor people.

Political isolationism, from the crowd that crows about free speech and free trade. Beautiful!
Click to expand...

I think staying away from the Neo-Nazis and the Stormfront people would be a good idea too. Do you disagree?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
Ron Paul for President!
Replies
8
Views
862
acptulsa
acptulsa
RonZeplin
Trump Supporters Are GW Bush Supporters LARPing As Ron Paul Supporters
6 7 8
Replies
142
Views
14K
enhanced_deficit
E
Anti Federalist
We are running out of time!
3 4 5
Replies
93
Views
25K
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
GunnyFreedom
RealID redux: H.R. 4760, the "Securing America's Future Act of 2018."
2
Replies
20
Views
2K
kahless
kahless
angelatc
You're Still Crying Wolf (About Trump)
Replies
6
Views
2K
The One
T
Back
Top