georgia_tech_swagger
Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2007
- Messages
- 356
HELP DISSECT - Updated numbers from Maine GOP has Ron Paul FURTHER behind by a little
- Thread starter georgia_tech_swagger
- Start date
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
All known errors would have been changed in Ron's favor. Let's see where they 'found' the other Romney votes....
and this is why they waited until they were leaving for the day/holiday weekend to post it.
cynically, since they have given us no reason behind their raising Romney's numbers, I am just assuming they think it is the amount they can get away with to give Romney a buffer going into this weekend's caucuses.
And if they don't want people drawing those conclusions they shouldn't 'throw away the ballots' misreport the votes, then refuse to correct the numbers even when they are known to be wrong, until there is national public outcry.
and this is why they waited until they were leaving for the day/holiday weekend to post it.
cynically, since they have given us no reason behind their raising Romney's numbers, I am just assuming they think it is the amount they can get away with to give Romney a buffer going into this weekend's caucuses.
And if they don't want people drawing those conclusions they shouldn't 'throw away the ballots' misreport the votes, then refuse to correct the numbers even when they are known to be wrong, until there is national public outcry.
Last edited:
carterm
Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 818
observations:
new portland, which was ronpaul 2, all other's 0, is still not being reported.
kennebec (china):
gop: paul 11, romney 6, santorum 1 (18 total)
wtv: paul 13, romney 3, santorum 1, newt 1 (18 total)
so these are still obviously wrong.
also, just realized all of these "0" across the board could've been used to plug in romney votes. so keep an eye out for that. get to work!
change thread title to priority
new portland, which was ronpaul 2, all other's 0, is still not being reported.
kennebec (china):
gop: paul 11, romney 6, santorum 1 (18 total)
wtv: paul 13, romney 3, santorum 1, newt 1 (18 total)
so these are still obviously wrong.
also, just realized all of these "0" across the board could've been used to plug in romney votes. so keep an eye out for that. get to work!
change thread title to priority
Last edited:
Service unavailable, can't download it...sounds like there are still problems though. Compare everything we have...tear this apart, but remember WTV has not been overly accurate in the past. Stick to the things that Swann and precincts reported for now, then try to find where Romney mysteriously gained votes...
georgia_tech_swagger
Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2007
- Messages
- 356
alucard13mmfmj
Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2012
- Messages
- 3,899
They just keep trying to go further with these shenanigans...
It's like "FINE, we will give Ron those causes... But we will just give Romney some extra votes elsewhere. "
I think the campaign may have forseen this.
It's like "FINE, we will give Ron those causes... But we will just give Romney some extra votes elsewhere. "
I think the campaign may have forseen this.
RonPaul101.com
Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2011
- Messages
- 1,769
I would bet you that even if RP turns out a 1000 voters in Washington county, Webster would "find" 800 missing Romney votes to counteract it.
The accuracy of the numbers is getting worse not better as time goes on.
Probably the only thing left to do is not stop asking for his resignation and boycott Maine (vacations, spending of any kind there.) Sadly it's the only way to show that cheating has consequences.
The accuracy of the numbers is getting worse not better as time goes on.
Probably the only thing left to do is not stop asking for his resignation and boycott Maine (vacations, spending of any kind there.) Sadly it's the only way to show that cheating has consequences.
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
If we end up controlling the delegates, there may be quite a bit we can do, down line. It won't change these results, of course.
Philosophy_of_Politics
Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,075
Can we have the numbers posted onto the forum itself please. Extracted from the excel sheet.
For new and old.
For new and old.
Philosophy_of_Politics
Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,075
Also, look to see how many votes changed with the other candidates. It may be likely that they use Newt/Santorum as "buffers" in order to suppress votes. That's probably the real reason why they're staying in the race, so they can pad Romney's numbers by diluting them from Paul and redistributing to everyone.
20 Ron Paul votes disappeared for Limington, York County while they found votes for Acton York with Romney getting 12 to Ron's 4.
In Portland, Cumberland County it was Mitt 91 Ron 106 and now it is Mitt 106 Ron 91.
Vinalhaven, Knox went from 4 Paul votes to 2 Paul votes.
Other changes were from Municipalities that went from no votes to something. All the above appear to be instances where the reported number of votes actually changed.
In Portland, Cumberland County it was Mitt 91 Ron 106 and now it is Mitt 106 Ron 91.
Vinalhaven, Knox went from 4 Paul votes to 2 Paul votes.
Other changes were from Municipalities that went from no votes to something. All the above appear to be instances where the reported number of votes actually changed.
Similar threads
