hypnagogue
Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2007
- Messages
- 1,074
How about neither? I'm not even sure what you're getting at with that question.Would you rather have a King or a mob-rule Democracy creating and changing moral laws?
How about neither? I'm not even sure what you're getting at with that question.Would you rather have a King or a mob-rule Democracy creating and changing moral laws?
Where does the JBS stand on the War on Drugs?
You are advertising them in your sig, you tell me. I've tried to get a clear answer and failed.
It's a pro-Republic, pro-Capitalist, and pro-Constitution propaganda film.So this is a JBS propaganda flick? Meh, don't feel a need to watch, I'll probably know where the video is headed anyway as I watch it.
"Morality" or humaness existed long before religion did, especially in the organized way you understand it. There is archaeological evidence of such behavior like humans caring for injured companions, even though the effort for doing so placed much greater needs on the group/tribe and the injured person was clearly more of a hinderance than benefit to group survival. You might scoff at this insight as being cold-hearted by todays standards, but circa Africa 90,000BCE willingly taking on the care of another individual could've spelled your doom quite easily, which makes it all the more remarkable. Therefore, I find your claim that "moral foundation" stems in any way from religion demonstratably false and rather presumptuous.Doesn't society need a solid moral foundation?
That is exactly what turns me off also. Libertarian party for me till another Ron Paul sweeps me off my feet.I really like both the JBS and the Constitution Party. However, it's their stubborn attachment to stressing a certain religion and distasteful aspects of social conservatism (like the drug war) that keeps me from being 100% on board. I really hope this is something Ron Paulians currently involved with these groups will be able to change.
That is exactly what turns me off also. Libertarian party for me till another Ron Paul sweeps me off my feet.![]()
First of all, drug legality is a State Issue not a federal issue. The JBS would agree that the federal "War on Drugs" is ineffective and a huge waste of money. Each state would have its own drug laws like some states making all drugs legal or just making marijuana legal or making all drugs illegal. Each state would have its own flavor of laws on drugs.
The JBS, as individuals not as a collective group, tend to lean toward Ron Paul's view of drugs. They recognize that certain drugs are unhealthy and addictive for the body and wish lead healthy lives, but wouldn't support a federal law banning drugs.
Ron Paul says he hates drugs and even chooses not to drink alcohol, but he feels we must make that choice for ourselves.
Well, if what you say is true, then why doesn't JBS put out a statement? Put it on their platform, or write an article showing how screwed the drug war is in their magazine they send me every month? I've been watching JBS for a little while now and never have I seen one piece of evidence that they oppose THE FEDERAL DRUG WAR. If you know of something, please shoot me a link.
Otherwise, realize that you trying to spin it for JBS.
You claim they have a similar stance to Ron Paul. Big difference Ron WALKS THE WALK! I do hear him openly opposing the War on Drugs!
Besides the drug war and the communism Russia fears; I like what JBS stands for.
why haven't the jbs put out a statement about drugs? There are bigger issues at hand like the federal reserve, north american union, and united nations/global government. These are top priority issues for the jbs.
Why haven't the JBS put out a statement about drugs? There are bigger issues at hand like the Federal Reserve, North American Union, and United Nations/Global Government. These are top priority issues for the JBS.
Anyway, I agree no need to split hairs. But, this clearly (in my eyes) shows JBS doesn't have THE COMPLETE PICTURE, and shouldn't expect a dime from me ANYMORE>The War on Drugs is a serious issue to me!
![]()
There is plenty of room in their newsletter and magazine every month for a small article (not to mention their website). Pretty sad you are trying to imply their position now by steering the argument as not important when compared to The FED, NAU, UN, etc.
Anyway, I agree no need to split hairs. But, this clearly (in my eyes) shows JBS doesn't have THE COMPLETE PICTURE, and shouldn't expect a dime from me ANYMORE>The War on Drugs is a serious issue to me!
![]()
Oh geez. That's right, the JBS is the enemy and are the ones destroying our country. By all means, let us take pot shots at them, because they don't adequately espouse drug use. You know, I'm against the drug war as much as anyone, but sometimes I wonder how many are against it on principle and the fact that it is used by government as an excuse to expand both in size and scope, or whether it is because some of us just want to lay around and smoke pot.I'm doubtful that pot will be readily available when we're all sitting in a gulag, so we just might want to look beyond just this one issue.