Hannity about to go on attack

  • Thread starter Thread starter RonPaulCult
  • Start date Start date
I'm an individualist. So no, I am not afraid of black men. Can't have it both ways- Can't say " I'm a libertarian individualist, not racist by definition" and then practice race-baiting identity politics- which the Newsletters and Rothbard/Rockwell strategy were a deliberate attempt. They attempted to play on white fears for political gain. A lot of people here endlessly complaining about "playing the race card" if it's not fearful whites doing it. Well guess what? The Paleo-whatever you want to call it wannabe movement of the late 80s- early 90s that included Paul's newsletters, the Rothbard/Rockwell writings ( that are very similar to the Paul newsletters) and the support of Pat Buchanan were all attempts at playing the race card. And the attempts to weasel out of it are downright Gingrichian.

And you know well Ron never backed that sort of approach whatever Rockwell or Rothbard did, and if you were really an individualist you would quit trying to pin the actions of different individuals to him. Don't fight your libertarian internecine grievances with Rockwell or Rothbard on Ron's body and campaign.
 
Last edited:
I know that we know that the media already knows all about this. We know they've just been witholding it. But they never let on that they know. Even about something that's been out since 4 years ago. They always act like they just dug it up and it's such a "huge surprise" etc. Hannity is saying "I can't believe the MSM hasn't brought this up yet, Ron Paul is almost to the top, and nobody is talking about this" like he just found out about this shit today. It's completely calculated. Hannity thought he'd get to ignore Ron Paul, and now he can't, so he's had the strategic reserve in the tank for 4 years for the moment that Ron Paul started to make the climb in the polls but he pretends like he just found out about this shit today.
 
Last edited:
What the hell is Lord talking about? This is going to fly right over Hannity listeners' heads.
 
I think its going to be diffiuclt to paint Ron Paul as a racist when he was the only Republican candidate who opposed racial profiling...

Sean "scares" me. Has he been vetted???

Seriously, I bet you a million dollars that Sean cannot point to anything Paul has said that was racist much less voted for such.
 
LMAO, guest is referring to William F Buckley and Mark Levin in the same sentence. Absurd.
 
Lord saying antisemitism is tied to Ron Paul through his supporters, because of what people on the internet say about Jews (Levin).
 
Heard that as well.

Then he said something like "Linda's shaking her head...that's not....yeah, I know that's not quite how it was said, but they said 'we've been asked that question enough and we don't have any new information in that regard' and I said 'NO! I'm not playing that game, I won't be dictated to blah blah blah...'"

Might they have played it like that with Blitzer as well? Must be the first time he wasnt asked about 3rd party
 
This isn't that bad. Any rational thinker will see right through this bullshit. They've tried this already.
 
Hannity's listeners have no clue what this guy is talking about. He sounds very unconvincing.
 
Back
Top