Hannity about to go on attack

  • Thread starter Thread starter RonPaulCult
  • Start date Start date
Just teased it on his radio show after interviewing newt. Looks like he'll be doing it in the next 10 minutes.

Here's the live feed if you want to hear the garbage.

http://player.streamtheworld.com/_players/citadel/?sid=5864

EDIT: He keeps teasing this but he hasn't done the segment yet. My best estimate would be around 4:30 ET now (looks like he'll interview Mitt first).

That is one reason I almost NEVER listen to Hannity. If you edited out the time he spends talking about what is coming up next, his show would probably only be about 20 min long.
 
I think its going to be diffiuclt to paint Ron Paul as a racist when he was the only Republican candidate who opposed racial profiling...
 
If this time period validation is real, then I would say this is a very poweful argument in favour of Ron Paul. We need to remember this and perhaps have the campaign acknowledge that Ron Paul wasn't even in politics at the time, and was running his personal business SERVING minorities!!!

It's true. From Reason magazine: "During the period when the most incendiary items appeared—roughly 1989 to 1994".
http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/16/who-wrote-ron-pauls-newsletter
 
I know I am going to get slammed for this but if the establishment and the statists derail Paul's campaign with smear tactics, HELL will be paid when Paul does run as an Independent. I'm just saying...

The sad thing is, the establishment could care less if Obama gets another four years. They would love it actually.
 
Discussing Ron's Foreign Policy, Jeff Lord's Neo-Liberal Article.

Bringing up Anti-Antisemitism/Non-Interventionism.

Talking about Tom Woods and how he's wrong.
 
I know I am going to get slammed for this but if the establishment and the statists derail Paul's campaign with smear tactics, HELL will be paid when Paul does run as an Independent. I'm just saying...

He doesn't remotely have to run. If Fox and the GOP don't treat him fairly, they will lose the general election.

Ron doesn't have to win the nomination, but he needs to rise or fall on an even playing field.
 
Thats all? Are you saying that isn't true?

I'm an individualist. So no, I am not afraid of black men. Can't have it both ways- Can't say " I'm a libertarian individualist, not racist by definition" and then practice race-baiting identity politics- which the Newsletters and Rothbard/Rockwell strategy were a deliberate attempt. They attempted to play on white fears for political gain. A lot of people here endlessly complaining about "playing the race card" if it's not fearful whites doing it. Well guess what? The Paleo-whatever you want to call it wannabe movement of the late 80s- early 90s that included Paul's newsletters, the Rothbard/Rockwell writings ( that are very similar to the Paul newsletters) and the support of Pat Buchanan were all attempts at playing the race card. And the attempts to weasel out of it are downright Gingrichian.
 
I know I am going to get slammed for this but if the establishment and the statists derail Paul's campaign with smear tactics, HELL will be paid when Paul does run as an Independent. I'm just saying...

I think we should do it JUST to show them they can't win without us. Tell em if they don't support us, we'll guarantee Obama a new 4 years.
 
Back
Top