Hannity about to go on attack

[Maverick]

I don't doubt that the campaign said something like "C'mon Sean, we've been asked the 3rd party question enough already and it's always the same answer, just let it go." And then Hannity decides to use that as cover for a convenient excuse to cancel the interview, but the real reason he canceled is that he got orders to attack and he doesn't have the balls to attack RP in person.

 

[sailingaway]

You know what has just happened, dont you? Everyone watching this thread has just missed Ron giving a killer interview on CNN to Wolf Blitzer. It is over now, so you might as well continue to take one for the cause. But you will want to see it to take the taste of this out of your mouths...

 

[Cowlesy]

Haha, I even fired up Sirius. Apparently Sean is going on the attack in a few minutes.

Doesn't even have Ron on to respond. So one sided. Love how they roll this out when Ron gains steam.

 

[Student Of Paulism]

You all had to expect this to happen, it is pretty much the only crap they can dig on him. Soon as he rises in the polls they will find something to smear him with.

 

[Cowlesy]

You know what has just happened, dont you? Everyone watching this thread has just missed Ron giving a killer interview on CNN to Wolf Blitzer. It is over now, so you might as well continue to take one for the cause. But you will want to see it to take the taste of this out of your mouths...

Thanks, Mom!

 

[sailingaway]

I don't doubt that the campaign said something like "C'mon Sean, we've been asked the 3rd party question enough already and it's always the same answer, just let it go." And then Hannity decides to use that as cover for a convenient excuse to cancel the interview, but the real reason he canceled is that he got orders to attack and he doesn't have the balls to attack RP in person.

It isn't that, he knows Ron would have a response and then there would be no time for the story to get ahead of Ron's answer. Real journalists ask for a response from the other side before making allegations.

 

[unknown]

"When we come back, the controversial past, writings and newsletters of Ron Paul."

Talking with Jeffery Lord about it.

From the American Spectator? The site seems to be pro-Newt.

 

[svobody]

the racist card is such a liberal media play. ron needs to call it what it is

 

[Johncjackson]

you know, that is the kind of thing I hear from those who don't want Ron to win under any circumstances. They just keep raising the bar on what Ron 'has to do to put it to rest'. Apologize using their specific phrases, or give the media a goat for sacrifice in who he might guess wrote them, or something. None of that goes to his quality as a presidential candidate.

Actually, a lot of people who want Ron to win just think it should be handled differently and think it hurts his chances to win if he doesn't, and possibly helps others at Paul's expense. How to handle dirt and oppo research is just part of politics and winning isn't some pure pursuit.

 

[RonPaulCult]

You know what has just happened, dont you? Everyone watching this thread has just missed Ron giving a killer interview on CNN to Wolf Blitzer. It is over now, so you might as well continue to take one for the cause. But you will want to see it to take the taste of this out of your mouths...

This is good motivation for all of us to keep working hard.

 

[sailingaway]

$1 million was actually the 1 year revenue from the newsletter company, but that figure is slightly exaggerated.

regardless, that won't have been Ron's take, but it doesn't matter if it was 20 million. It is still a matter of not peering over the shoulders of independent management to see if a volunteer used cheap rhetoric, not a venial sin.

 

[Jtorsella]

Here's hoping we're overreacting and Hannity is ambiguous.

 

[kylejack]

3 hours a day, that's all he asks.

 

[Maverick]

Earlier when interviewing Romney, Hannity said:

"You know, I'm glad that all of these Republican candidates are being vetted so thoroughly, it's really good for the process I think. Though, the only candidate that hasn't been vetted at all is...Ron Paul."

He's been having fun all day dropping in the hints and segueways, and pretending like he's shocked and he's never heard of these newsletters before today.

 

[Captain America]

It shows that he doesn't understand free market economics. How there is no race laws in a free market society. He is fishing, I do not believe people will take the bait. Hannity should be ashamed of himself. He calls himself a Christian and lies to America. He calls himself a Conservative when the only "conservative" thing is the war policy of death. WWJD, Sean?

 

[69360]

I turned it on. I don't think it's going to be that bad.

 

[ord33]

Great...Right at the peak 5:00 drive time when people get off work and are in their cars.

 

[RonPaulCult]

I turned it on. I don't think it's going to be that bad.

I predict it's going to be FILLED with lies.

 

[unknown]

Im in the middle of making phone bank calls, now I gotta listen to this jackA$$.

 

[Liberty74]

Nevermind, Sean Hannity just said he cancelled the interview because the Paul campaign didnt want Hannity to ask about 3rd party run

I know I am going to get slammed for this but if the establishment and the statists derail Paul's campaign with smear tactics, HELL will be paid when Paul does run as an Independent. I'm just saying...