Hannity about to go on attack

[AlexG]

Nevermind, Sean Hannity just said he cancelled the interview because the Paul campaign didnt want Hannity to ask about 3rd party run

 

[ord33]

Well Jeff Lord sucks but Lord is hung up on foreign policy, not newsletters from the 1990s. So that's what this will probably be about (foreign policy).

He's even complaining about Daily Paul and their words about Lord's buddy Mark Levin: http://spectator.org/blog/2011/10/27/attention-ron-paul-anti-semiti

 

[cary]

... what does this mean: “We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, but it is hardly irrational.”"

Ron could reply by asking his interrogator if Jesse Jackson and Juan Williams are racist:

Jesse Jackson::

"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved.... After all we have been through. Just to think we can't walk down our own streets, how humiliating."

Juan Williams:

"Let me just tell you, with the amount of black on black crime in America, I get nervous and I'm a black man."

 

[dmitchell]

Too many people have too many opinions on what the perfect words are. He has issued a variety of statements. Pick your favorite, but he can't chase everyone's perfect phrasing. In addition, in my experience people demanding these 'proofs' aren't really swayable, their intent is to keep the issue open, is all.

I'm sure that's true of some people. However, I don't think believing that an apology should contain the words "I'm sorry" is really a case of of "too may opinions on what the perfect words are." That's pretty standard for apologies, no?

 

[Brian4Liberty]

"We'll let Ron Paul back on the program, but there are things troubling about his background that we'll get into in the next hour"

FUD, commercials, FUD, commercials, FUD,...

 

[Maverick]

He said he canceled because Ron Paul campaign didn't want Hannity to ask about 3rd party.

Heard that as well.

Then he said something like "Linda's shaking her head...that's not....yeah, I know that's not quite how it was said, but they said 'we've been asked that question enough and we don't have any new information in that regard' and I said 'NO! I'm not playing that game, I won't be dictated to blah blah blah...'"

 

[Havax]

Let's throw snowballs at Hannity again next time we see him. He's a lost cause.

 

[sailingaway]

"We'll let Ron Paul back on the program, but there are things troubling about his background that we'll get into in the next hour"

without him here to defend himself....

 

[Karsten]

Nevermind, Sean Hannity just said he cancelled the interview because the Paul campaign didnt want Hannity to ask about 3rd party run

And you believe that shit?

 

[ShaneEnochs]

Says he's going to talk about the newsletters next.

 

[JCF]

"When we come back, the controversial past, writings and newsletters of Ron Paul."

Talking with Jeffery Lord about it.

 

[sailingaway]

Let's throw snowballs at Hannity again next time we see him. He's a lost cause.

no, lets not. We'll just have to go a different route.

 

[RonPaulCult]

He said "we'll have Ron Paul back on the show"

LIAR

 

[sailingaway]

"When we come back, the controversial past, writings and newsletters of Ron Paul."

Talking with Jeffery Lord about it.

I can't believe he has slime like Lord and Levin on but not Ron.

 

[Johncjackson]

It is hard to find logic in internet poison because it usually grows 'operator game style' with people recharacterizing the nonsense they heard from someone else. So they are saying over the 10 years it ran there were a million in subscriber fees? and there are what, 10 questionable sentences over those ten years? So we should find out how many sentences there were in the newsletters over ten years to divide and find out the percentage of fees 'tainted' by bad content? And then find out how much fo those subscriber fees to the independent editor actually went to Ron as a licensing fee for his name, and then apply that percentage to see how much of what went to Ron was tainted? And then decide if he should have known in advance this would happen and as a private citizen not politician should have protected himself?

I find that argument in the 'don't feed the trolls' category.

$1 million was actually the 1 year revenue from the newsletter company, but that figure is slightly exaggerated.

 

[ItsTime]

why even listen? Just wait for the tube.

 

[RonPaulCult]

This is an impressive hit piece. Well done propaganda machine. Well done.

 

[mullenium]

oh gawd.. here we go with the newsletter BS

 

[dmitchell]

Guess I was wrong. It's going to be the newsletters.

 

[AlexG]

why even listen? Just wait for the tube.

yea i didnt realize how many commercials radio shows have. no wonder podcasts and youtube are so popular