Promontorium
Member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2009
- Messages
- 1,091
Someone asked Fiorina why she opposed forbidding people on the no-fly list from being able to have guns.
Nevermind that this is a ridiculous and loaded question. Fiorina's response made sense, the "No-Fly List" is far too messed up and arbitrary to be a deciding factor in denying someone their rights.
Boxer's response was nonesense. She either accidentally, or intentionally interpreted this as meaning, "Do you think people on the no fly list should be able to take their guns on planes". She responded by saying they shouldn't be able to, and that only pilots should be able to carry guns on planes. !!!!! <--- ???
So I assumed Fiorina would call her out for not making sense, she did, but it was for an entirely different reason and she trailed off.
And there went the only gun question in the debate. Absolutely a waste of time.
Nevermind that this is a ridiculous and loaded question. Fiorina's response made sense, the "No-Fly List" is far too messed up and arbitrary to be a deciding factor in denying someone their rights.
Boxer's response was nonesense. She either accidentally, or intentionally interpreted this as meaning, "Do you think people on the no fly list should be able to take their guns on planes". She responded by saying they shouldn't be able to, and that only pilots should be able to carry guns on planes. !!!!! <--- ???
So I assumed Fiorina would call her out for not making sense, she did, but it was for an entirely different reason and she trailed off.
And there went the only gun question in the debate. Absolutely a waste of time.
