GOP USA wants us to be nice?

[xRedfoxx]

I guess they want us to be nice for ignoring Ron Paul all season.

http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/?p=599

 

[framecut]

I guess they want us to be nice for ignoring Ron Paul all season.

http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/?p=599

Dr. Paul would agree with this article as well. Heck, it's part of his platform!

 

[maxmerkel]

he dares to mention littlegreenfootballs in his article ?????????????

i'm seriously schocked.

 

[xRedfoxx]

I agree we all need to cut the rudeness, but to let up on a GOP forum that is ignoring Ron Paul? I don't think so. They need to rename their forum the Demo Forum or something.

 

[framecut]

I agree we all need to cut the rudeness, but to let up on a GOP forum that is ignoring Ron Paul? I don't think so. They need to rename their forum the Demo Forum or something.

All what you can do is be open to debate. Have your points debated and be respectful of other's opinions.

People don't trust or like a zealot.

 

[OceanMachine7]

I sent this response:

As a Republican and supporter of Ron Paul, I certainly see a lot of truth in what you are saying. Now that Paul has reached the level of top-tier because of his fundraising, more traditional tactics are required. However, GOPUSA and the Republican Party would be well served to examine why these more zealous supporters feel so betrayed by their party and the media. Ron Paul is pushing traditional Republican ideals, and up until very recently, has been treated like a traitor for it. If the GOP wishes to reverse its recent slide, some introspection about this would be quite beneficial. The best way to deal with overzealous Ron Paul supporters is to address the root of their complaints: the straying of the Republican Party from small-government ideals.

 

[hillertexas]

It's easy...just make your online poll so that people can only vote once. Self created problem solved.

 

[Mortikhi]

Reads like a crap article from a crap site written by a crap author.
He's writing like its 5 months ago: Ron Paul supports SPAM polls. Whatever. Log the IP, drop a cookie, and be done with it. Not everyone has access to a multitude of IP addresses.

Thanks for pointing out another site I never plan on visiting again.

Oh, and I voted for Bush the past two times. No pinko commie here. Just an awakened neo-con that has seen the light.

 

[tmg19103]

Just ignore. They are looking for advertising hits.

 

[Tenbatsu]

He uses LGF as a source? You have to be kidding me.

 

[gardeniabee]

Yes, I do believe that we should be polite... to the end. Because more importantly than confronting others en mass -- which understandably gets old quick in their eyes -- is to be so busy promoting Dr. Paul in positive ways, that such "in your face" behavior is limited.

I suggest that some of us when visiting other sites make clear our professional behavior and ask our Ron Paul supporters to remember what Ron Paul would do. www.wwrpd.org

 

[JoshLowry]

Here is how GOPUSA.com treated a friend of mine back in May:

http://x019.uploaderx.net/x/GOPUSA.jpg

He was banned for that one post when he saw the admin harping on Ron Paul and replied with a civil response. The admin then deleted his own posts and Mr1954's post.

I want to know how that was civil.

 

[conner_condor]

Ignore that fool.. He just wants attention and traffic to his site.. Don't give the prick the pleasure of putting his blog up in the numbers..

 

[Mark Rushmore]

http://x019.uploaderx.net/x/GOPUSA.jpg

If the GOPUSA admins believe the Patriot Act is a plank of conservative faith, that's something.

 

[LibertyEagle]

I sent this response:

As a Republican and supporter of Ron Paul, I certainly see a lot of truth in what you are saying. Now that Paul has reached the level of top-tier because of his fundraising, more traditional tactics are required. However, GOPUSA and the Republican Party would be well served to examine why these more zealous supporters feel so betrayed by their party and the media. Ron Paul is pushing traditional Republican ideals, and up until very recently, has been treated like a traitor for it. If the GOP wishes to reverse its recent slide, some introspection about this would be quite beneficial. The best way to deal with overzealous Ron Paul supporters is to address the root of their complaints: the straying of the Republican Party from small-government ideals.

Great response.

 

[MsDoodahs]

Here is how GOPUSA.com treated a friend of mine back in May:

http://x019.uploaderx.net/x/GOPUSA.jpg

He was banned for that one post when he saw the admin harping on Ron Paul and replied with a civil response. The admin then deleted his own posts and Mr1954's post.

I want to know how that was civil?

Let me get this straight.

Their own admin acts like a ^&%&*, making ridiculous comments about the good doctor, then gets pwned by an eloquent RP supporter, then deletes both posts in shame, then bans the eloquent RP supporter, and now this same site ...

what is it they want from us again?

Oh, that's right...TRAFFIC!

 

[framecut]

Here is how GOPUSA.com treated a friend of mine back in May:

http://x019.uploaderx.net/x/GOPUSA.jpg

He was banned for that one post when he saw the admin harping on Ron Paul and replied with a civil response. The admin then deleted his own posts and Mr1954's post.

I want to know how that was civil.

I'm wondering though.

How are non-Ron Paul supporters treated on this forum?

Are they given refreshingly healthy debate, or does the Admin steps in and bans/slams the guy?

 

[MsDoodahs]

Non RP supporters aren't here very often, as this is a RON PAUL forum and billed as such.

Calling oneself "GOPUSA" and proceeding to slam a fellow Republican or support a specific one is downright dirty IMO.

 

[lemnad]

LOL- he says were all in this together towards the end of the article. Shure doesn't feel like it!

 

[framecut]

Non RP supporters aren't here very often, as this is a RON PAUL forum and billed as such.

Calling oneself "GOPUSA" and proceeding to slam a fellow Republican or support a specific one is downright dirty IMO.

Sorry, but I find this answer kinda cryptic.

So if someone comes here and debates Dr. Paul's points and pushes for another candidate, they'll get the boot?

A 'Yes' or 'No' would do.