GOP USA wants us to be nice?

[SeanEdwards]

This guy and with him GOP USA is calling for a truce.

What is your answer fellow Ron Paulians?

That guy, and the gopusa site, personify the reason why registering republican made my skin crawl. I did it, begrudgingly, in order to vote for RP, but under most circumstances it's those people that I think of when I think republican.

I don't really want a truce with them. I want to expel them from the republican party into the wilderness of third party irrelevance.

 

[torchbearer]

Ask the GOPUSA if they remember the 5th of november.
Out of concern for their safety I'd warn them they could become targets of retribution if they are perceived as enabling the state to control American Citizens.
We don't advocate violence, but i'm afraid things may lead to that if the neocons go Karl Rove on Ron Paul.

 

[freelance]

And on last thing before I find something new to make me livid all over again:

I love the way the author points toward LGF and RedState like they are some kind of paragons of civility. GIVE ME A BREAK! Those are two of the rudest, crudest sites on the Internet. I think it's an HONOR that they've banned RP supporters, though I've never had the stomach to post on either site.

 

[The Dane]

That guy, and the gopusa site, personify the reason why registering republican made my skin crawl. I did it, begrudgingly, in order to vote for RP, but under most circumstances it's those people that I think of when I think republican.

I don't really want a truce with them. I want to expel them from the republican party into the wilderness of third party irrelevance.

Might be that you are right of your judgement, but he is still calling for a truce. He could be at the stage before a conversion. Think about it. I honestly think that he wants truce and he wants to learn from us. - However he still has to think about some of his neocon freinds and his reputation amongst them.

 

[torchbearer]

Who wants to read the civility of the Hannity forum? Perhaps this guy would like to write about these screens i have with one of their long time mods going psychotic.

 

[torchbearer]

 

[torchbearer]

 

[torchbearer]

Now, who is being uncivil?

 

[xRedfoxx]

Redstate.....who made them the the ones to set the bar? If we start kicking folks off our blog, will we get national attention? Hell no!!


http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=Redfox1969

 

[freelance]

Dane, writers love nothing better than to turn a clever phrase that can be rightfully interpreted both ways. This author failed at both--he was neither clever in turning a phrase nor clever in hiding his intent. This article was pure venom.

 

[framecut]

Just ignore this people.

If you give in to your anger...they will 'win'

 

[hambone1982]

Notice the Mod posting on the hannity forum kept repeating his propaganda over and over again? "He let babies die while he studied economics."

That guy either has huge gonads or no soul.

My guess is the latter.

 

[inibo]

I saw this link posted there:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll454.xml

RP voted Yes.. what's the story behind that?

.

I saw that. What you are seeing is deliberate misinformation. Roll call 454 was a motion to recommit with instructions. http://www.rules.house.gov/archives/recommit_mot.htm (look at item 2.) It was a last attempt to send it back to committee in hopes of getting it amended or killed before it went to the floor for a vote. What Ron Paul was voting for was to prevent it from coming to a floor vote. If you look a the link supplied you'll see that roll call 454 was defeated so the bill went to the floor for passage where Ron Paul voted against it. The vote for passage was roll call 455. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml If you look at that one you will see Ron Paul voted against passage and the bill passed.

I almost registered just to respond to that post, but I figured it was a waste of time considering I have no intention of getting myself distracted. Anyone who already has an account there should definitely go set them straight and point out this is why we get mad. Establishment Republican have no compunction about deliberately lying when it suits their purposes.

BTW, I haven't finished this thread yet, so if someone already addressed this, forgive my waste of bandwidth.

 

[dmitchell]

We must be nice. No one is going to join us if we are not.

 

[Phenom24]

GOPUSA sucks. I went there a few months ago when they were asking the question whether or not Christian people should/would vote for Giuliani. I posted a nice, concise post and what did I get in reply?

"Oh great, not another one..."

They suck. Let them wallow in their neo-con mud puddle.

 

[dmitchell]

We must be nice. No one is going to join us if we are not.

 

[pcosmar]

We must be nice. No one is going to join us if we are not.

We are nice, I am , most of the people have been nice on this forum. There were even nice attempts to discuss issues with the rude "hanity" troll that was here. That guy was nothing but rude.

It seems that the more nice we are, the more nasty, and rude these Neo-Cons get.

 

[ForLiberty-RonPaul]

We must be nice. No one is going to join us if we are not.

I joined you. Acting the way we have is what has gotten us here. What has spread the word, and what has garnered attention. You can be polite and forceful at the same time. (i.e. RP in any GOP debate)

Are we going to take "marching orders" from a non-Ron Paul supporter?? Someone who is still day dreaming that the world they see on TV is the one that really exists?

Didn't RP approve of the massive amounts of email sent to a reporter on MSNBC???

this "everyone play nice" stuff is a trap. America's enslavement of African peoples didn't end because the slaves were diplomatic. However, forceful language and massive amounts of emails are a far cry from Nat Turner's Rebellion.

 

[freelance]

Hey Welcome to the forum, ForLiberty-RonPaul. I agree with you, BTW. There's a whole lot of ground between roll over and die and be nice. I like to think I'm nice, but I'm not about to roll over and die for anyone. And, THAT'S what they don't like about us. They thought that if they ignored us, we'd go away. They found out otherwise, and now they're demanding that we be weak, meek and mind our manners. HA! They've got a LOT of nerve.

 

[westmich4paul]

email to the editor

I responded with this, I think i was courteous but to the point.

Dear Sir, I wanted to write to you in regards to your comments that a majority of Ron Paul supporters are hurting their campaign with negativity spread through e-mails , ect. I do see your point, to a point. Anyone that responds to you whether it be from Ron's campaign or any other should at least be civily respectful, that I agree with you on. But for you to point out that Ron's grassroots supporters are the only ones that act in a disrespectful nature I find that hard to believe and if it is happening(completely and only from the Paul side) then one must also look at maybe what is it that is causing this reaction? Could it be the attack that has been thouroughly documented that Ron is not a Republican? When in fact he has been running as a Republican for the majority of his career? But for some they cannot get past that one year he ran as a Libertarian and try to paint him as soley a Libertarian to discredit his many years as a Republican? Or could it be the outrage we feel as Republican's everytime they(top GOP people) try to paint our candidate as a kook, a loon, ect when in fact he is the most conservative Republican on the campaign trail this year. Or maybe it could be top media people like Hannity, O'reily and ect that disrespect Ron everytime they interview him much the same as you say we do to you? But that is never mentioned by you. You know I haven't once ever heard any GOP official ever even talk about Ron Paul being a close friend to Ronald Reagan? Hmm I wonder why? I am not or ever will condone any Paul supporter that is dispespectful to anyone except if they themselves are being attacked in the same way or attacking our candidate in the same way. You do realize we have the right to defend our candidate and we should do so repectfully. I haven't ever seen Dr. Paul attack Hannity. Nor have I ever seen Dr. Paul attack Bill O'reily. But I have seen them attack him very disrespectfully and not once did I see you write an article against this type of behavior. So do you want it to be one sided? Do you want Ron's grassroot supporters to watch their guy and our campaign get disrespected at will by the elite in the GOP, but on the other side you want his supporters to sit by and watch it happen without comment or recourse? Because that is exactly what this article implies. Sir I will give you the utmost respect and dignity you deserve but on the other hand I also expect it given back to me and my campaign. I expect equal and unbiased articles on my candidate that you give all the others. I expect you to call out the top tier GOP elite that disrespect our campaign in the same fashion you did our people in this article. You do that my Republican brother, and we will be a united party regardless if we have differen't views as to the direction the party goes. Just because we may believe the party should be run differently than the rest of the candidates does still not make us any less a Republican. Thank you for your time sir and I hope to hear good things in the future. Sincerely, John Mitchell (Republican for Paul!)