Globalists Are Rebranding Their “Woke Capitalism” Agenda After Crushing Setbacks

[PAF]

By Brandon Smith
August 21, 2025


People who carefully track the machinations of globalist institutions might have noticed a disturbing atmosphere of silence since the 2024 elections. I discussed this trend a few months ago in my article “Globalists Go Radio Silent As NATO Flirts With World War III”, specifically the dramatic shift that has taken place since the pandemic when organizations like the World Economic Forum ripped the mask off completely and admitted their true authoritarian intentions.

By the end of 2021, most of the world was under maniacal technocratic control and the globalists seemed to think they had western civilization by the balls. The elites were constantly in the media openly touting their plans, from perpetual covid lockdowns, to vaccine passports, to climate lockdowns, to cashless digital monetary systems where all economic liberty is lost, to the “sharing economy” where private property is abolished, to the Fourth Industrial Revolution in which AI runs everything, to the “Great Reset” which would completely undermine the free market system and herald a socialist dystopia.

In my 20 years as an economist, writer and analyst in the liberty movement I have never seen the globalists reveal their true intentions so brazenly. The pandemic exposed an incredible number of people to the underlying reality of the “New World Order” and in that span of around three years the awakening skyrocketed. The number of patriots born during covid was unprecedented.

People realized it wasn’t a mere conspiracy theory. World events were not simply random products of chance and chaos. There was indeed a smoky god-damn room filled with nefarious plotting parasites. The march towards global governance was real and now everyone except the dumbest of the dumb knows it.

The powers-that-be were so confident in the success of their endeavor that they essentially proclaimed global government by bureaucrats and corporations in the very midst of covid. Calling it the “Council for Inclusive Capitalism” working in collusion with the Vatican.





The question we have to ask today is, where did it all go? The globalists were so confident and bold and now they are reticent. Did they give up? Or, are they rebranding their agenda yet again?

For example, in 2020 almost no one knew what ESG was. By 2023 everyone understood that the meaningless acronym for “Environmental, Social, Governance” is actually an insidious cover designed to hide the woke capitalism agenda.

Woke capitalism, also known as inclusive capitalism, is a centralization program which links together governments, bureaucratic agencies, NGOs as well as international banks and corporations under one ideological umbrella (globalism, multiculturalism, DEI, climate change, etc). This massive cartel uses monetary incentives and extortion to force businesses and individuals to conform to a woke/socialist model.





For the last decade these groups have been funding a suffocating propaganda campaign, forcing woke indoctrination onto the masses. However, the globalists didn’t comprehend the level of push-back that they ultimately encountered.

In their arrogance, they ended up inspiring more resistance, not less. And so, terms like ESG and DEI are being abandoned. Even Lynn Forester de Rothschild, head of the Council for Inclusive Capitalism, was forced to admit that ESG is dead and needs to be rebranded.





Within the occult methodology the natural solution would be to adopt new organizations and new names but maintain the same goals. I’ve noticed that this happens often with the globalists. At one point the majority of their planning was done within the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group. Then it was the Club Of Rome and the UN. Then it was the IMF. Then the focus switched to Davos and the WEF.

They used the term “New World Order”, then switched to “Multipolar World Order”, then to “the Great Reset” and the “Fourth Industrial Revolution”. This makes it very difficult for researchers to track the most current mechanisms of the conspiracy.

I have found that, in the last year, “Stakeholder Capitalism” has become the fresh code for much of their renewed efforts. It’s not a new term, but it is being used more often by the elites to draw less attention. Some use the phrase “stakeholder capitalism 3.0” or “third phase stakeholder capitalism”.

The original idea being that corporations can no longer make profits a priority. Rather, they must produce equal outcomes (not just equal opportunities) in order to participate in the interdependent international economy. In order to get access to the system, companies must promote approved narratives on climate and social justice, as well as partner with governments and NGOs to make DEI equity a reality.

The companies that don’t participate will face pressure from government officials and will not be able to compete with companies that comply. The problem is, this requires that meritocracy be erased and that producers be forced to subsidize feeders on a planetary scale. That is to say, stakeholder capitalism is global communism cloaked in the humanist costume of corporate responsibility.

The World Economic Forum seems to be doubling down on ESG and stakeholder capitalism with Blackrock CEO Larry Fink at the helm, despite growing public opposition. Though, Blackrock has removed a majority of ESG and DEI related language from their corporate reports.

.
.

Continue:

Globalists Are Rebranding Their “Woke Capitalism” Agenda After Crushing Setbacks - Alt-Market.us

By Brandon Smith People who carefully track the machinations of globalist institutions might have noticed a disturbing atmosphere of silence...

alt-market.us

 

[TheTexan]

The globalists are winning and the consequences of them winning are severe.

It's truly a battle of good vs evil

 

[jmdrake]

What a masterful stroke of genius by the Satanists on the right and the left to take a term that litterally means "Be aware of what's going on around you" and twist it to mean "Support Dylan Mulvaney's female cosplay." I need to sell t-shirts that say "Stay comotose." Militaries used to shoot soldiers for not staying woke while on guard duty. But stay asleep. Pretend everything will be fine as long as your can win your particular phase of the culture war. Don't look at the man behind the curtain.

Meanwhile:

1 Peter 5:8 "Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:"

 

[Snowball]

What are you guys really complaining about? It's TRUE. Capitalism cannot survive without becoming inclusive to the COMMON MAN. If capitalism doesn't regard the environment with care, and INCLUDE the COMMON MAN, it will be overthrown anyway.

This tiny group has enough money to own everything. Why disparage them when they want to share some ownership? Why resent them when they understand the big picture is what's really important?

 

[acptulsa]

Capitalism cannot survive without becoming inclusive to the COMMON MAN.

The way you all-cap COMMON MAN reminds me of Marxists of the 1930s, trying to sell communism even as Stalin was murdering tens of millions of COMMON MEN. It also reminds me of Trump and his twitposters' newfound fascination with eighteenth century-style Random capital Letters.

But I don't see you providing any examples of how any of this means the people exercising incredible power are sharing anything. Ever since Reagan used the catchphrase "public -private partnership" to convince people fat and happy on capitalism to trade it for getting psyoped and squeezed by corporatism, and refused to nip the regulatory state nightmare in the bud, these people have accumulated wealth and spent it on propaganda. They can't dazzle us with brilliance so they dazzle us with bullshit. They throw psyops at us until we get just so fed up, then back off, install a populist tool, and "rebrand".

I don't understand how someone who seems to spend every waking hour doing research, some of it high quality research, into their activities can so completely misunderstand what they're really doing and how they benefit. These people ratchet up pressure, then relieve it. They do it on purpose. It's called psychological warfare.

The reason is, the things they use to torture us, transgender child butchering and equity robbing of productive workers and racist games, aren't anything they care about. They sell it all to the easily brainwashed, encourage the equal and opposite reaction, back off the b.s. (which, again, is nothing any of them actually cares about), and throw us a bone. Then useful idiots say idiotic things like, "Stop complaining, they're sharing now," and they get away with continuing wealth (and power) transfer (to themselves) and mass murder via printing funny money.

It's not capitalism, it's corporatism, rule by corporate-government alliance, a.k.a fascism, and none of them are sharing a damned thing with us but ebbing and flowing psychological warfare attacks. Rebranding is not repentance. Shouting 1930s era socialist slogans certainly isn't doing a damned thing to stop them.

 

[jmdrake]

The way you all-cap COMMON MAN reminds me of Marxists of the 1930s, trying to sell communism even as Stalin was murdering tens of millions of COMMON MEN. It also reminds me of Trump and his twitposters' newfound fascination with eighteenth century-style Random capital Letters.

But I don't see you providing any examples of how any of this means the people exercising incredible power are sharing anything. Ever since Reagan used the catchphrase "public -private partnership" to convince people fat and happy on capitalism to trade it for getting psyoped and squeezed by corporatism, and refused to nip the regulatory state nightmare in the bud, these people have accumulated wealth and spent it on propaganda. They can't dazzle us with brilliance so they dazzle us with bullshit. They throw psyops at us until we get just so fed up, then back off, install a populist tool, and "rebrand".

I don't understand how someone who seems to spend every waking hour doing research, some of it high quality research, into their activities can so completely misunderstand what they're really doing and how they benefit. These people ratchet up pressure, then relieve it. They do it on purpose. It's called psychological warfare.

The reason is, the things they use to torture us, transgender child butchering and equity robbing of productive workers and racist games, aren't anything they care about. They sell it all to the easily brainwashed, encourage the equal and opposite reaction, back off the b.s. (which, again, is nothing any of them actually cares about), and throw us a bone. Then useful idiots say idiotic things like, "Stop complaining, they're sharing now," and they get away with continuing wealth (and power) transfer (to themselves) and mass murder via printing funny money.

It's not capitalism, it's corporatism, rule by corporate-government alliance, a.k.a fascism, and none of them are sharing a damned thing with us but ebbing and flowing psychological warfare attacks. Rebranding is not repentance. Shouting 1930s era socialist slogans certainly isn't doing a damned thing to stop them.

Ummm....would you mind doing some research on the term "woke?" I guarantee you it's not what you, or @PAF or whoever wrote the OP article thinks it is.

 

[acptulsa]

Ummm....would you mind doing some research on the term "woke?"

Well, I guess I was hijacking the thread then, because I didn't use the term and wasn't really addressing it.

Whatever it's supposed to be, whatever it really is, it's being used as a catchphrase in psychological warfare. And this "rebranding" talk is still cover for the fact that this is a "relieve the pressure" cycle of an ongoing psyop.

 

[PAF]

Ummm....would you mind doing some research on the term "woke?" I guarantee you it's not what you, or @PAF or whoever wrote the OP article thinks it is.

From the OP:

"Woke capitalism, also known as inclusive capitalism, is a centralization program which links together governments, bureaucratic agencies, NGOs as well as international banks and corporations under one ideological umbrella (globalism, multiculturalism, DEI, climate change, etc). This massive cartel uses monetary incentives and extortion to force businesses and individuals to conform..."​

 

[Madison320]

Ummm....would you mind doing some research on the term "woke?" I guarantee you it's not what you, or @PAF or whoever wrote the OP article thinks it is.

I'm more worried about the definition of capitalism which is "a system of voluntary exchange based on individual rights".

As soon as you add "woke" capitalism or "crony" capitalism or "whatever" capitalism, it's no longer a "system of voluntary exchange based on individual rights" it's a "system of forced exchange based on the needs of the state". In another words, socialism.

And when those socialist systems fail capitalism gets blamed, not socialism.

 

[Occam's Banana]

I'm more worried about the definition of capitalism which is "a system of voluntary exchange based on individual rights".

As soon as you add "woke" capitalism or "crony" capitalism or "whatever" capitalism, it's no longer a "system of voluntary exchange based on individual rights" it's a "system of forced exchange based on the needs of the state". In another words, socialism.

And when those socialist systems fail capitalism gets blamed, not socialism.

https://x.com/RockChartrand/status/1958621157881503880

When politicians say “capitalism failed,” what they really mean is: we regulated it, taxed it, suffocated it, and it had the nerve not to thrive anyway

They impose minimum wages that price out the least skilled, then cry that capitalism leaves people behind. They inflate the currency until savings evaporate, then accuse the market of making life unaffordable. They throttle energy production, drive up costs, then shriek that corporations are greedy for raising prices. Every failure they point to is the result of their own meddling.

It’s like setting fire to a factory and then pointing at the ashes as proof that free enterprise doesn’t work. Capitalism is the scapegoat they drag into the square, while the real culprit, the state, quietly slips away with the match still smoking.

The truth is simple: capitalism doesn’t fail when it’s left free. It only fails when it’s shackled, gagged, and sabotaged by the very people who hate it most.

 

[Snowball]

The way you all-cap COMMON MAN reminds me of Marxists of the 1930s, trying to sell communism even as Stalin was murdering tens of millions of COMMON MEN. It also reminds me of Trump and his twitposters' newfound fascination with eighteenth century-style Random capital Letters.

But I don't see you providing any examples of how any of this means the people exercising incredible power are sharing anything. Ever since Reagan used the catchphrase "public -private partnership" to convince people fat and happy on capitalism to trade it for getting psyoped and squeezed by corporatism, and refused to nip the regulatory state nightmare in the bud, these people have accumulated wealth and spent it on propaganda. They can't dazzle us with brilliance so they dazzle us with bullshit. They throw psyops at us until we get just so fed up, then back off, install a populist tool, and "rebrand".

I don't understand how someone who seems to spend every waking hour doing research, some of it high quality research, into their activities can so completely misunderstand what they're really doing and how they benefit. These people ratchet up pressure, then relieve it. They do it on purpose. It's called psychological warfare.

The reason is, the things they use to torture us, transgender child butchering and equity robbing of productive workers and racist games, aren't anything they care about. They sell it all to the easily brainwashed, encourage the equal and opposite reaction, back off the b.s. (which, again, is nothing any of them actually cares about), and throw us a bone. Then useful idiots say idiotic things like, "Stop complaining, they're sharing now," and they get away with continuing wealth (and power) transfer (to themselves) and mass murder via printing funny money.

It's not capitalism, it's corporatism, rule by corporate-government alliance, a.k.a fascism, and none of them are sharing a damned thing with us but ebbing and flowing psychological warfare attacks. Rebranding is not repentance. Shouting 1930s era socialist slogans certainly isn't doing a damned thing to stop them.

I'm not FOR them. I'm just saying that the needs of the common man who got outplayed by the capitalists is WHY this is happening.
More unfettered capitalism is NOT the answer to a monopoly game that is essentially over, indeed was over when it began, and the BANK is turning back to the losers, saying, "We need to keep you involved, so that you feel like you have a stake in this world, we understand that .0001% should not have all the wealth necessary to own every tangible good, and provide every service, so we wish to INCLUDE you in this ownership", because that's the inclusion they are talking about now. They are talking about dropping the woke stuff and making society more equitable than it otherwise is. The way things are now, money has changed. I'm not a Marxist in any way. I'm just a realist. You know Schumpter said this would happen. Pope Leo XIII, Willam Cobbett, and Henry George and others warned it would happen, but the apologists for libertarian economics did nothing but allow and vote for ALL THIS. They either got HAD or were willing participants. Their excuse? The world still appeared big.

Jeffersonian democracy was poor, and at odds with the European elites, the Federalists. Were THEY Marxists? Charles A. Beard and Frederick Jackson Turner were two historians who wrote about these matters, and Quigley explains how we lost this country to them, and the robber barons funded by capitalists of foreign money was detailed by Matthew Josephson. Was G. K. Chesterton a Marxist for calling out that Big Business and Big Government were colluding against real freedom and the family? When controversial authors said BOTH capitalism and communism are Judeo-Masonic plots against the natural law and natural man, were they wrong, or were they uncomfortably correct?

I KNOW that they want to change capitalism so that THEY can stay in power. It's their neo-Fabianist tactics. The game is over. Pretending that there's still a game to play, and a wide open board outside our doors is not bravery, it's ignorance. I have said for years this was coming. THEIR CAPITALISM is HOW it happened. Which is NO LESS THEIRS than Bolshevism. Their plot predates Marx by over 100 years. Fake Left, Fake Right, Fake promises, Fake stats, Fake parties, Fake celebrities, Fake money, and Fake choices.

 

[jmdrake]

From the OP:

"Woke capitalism, also known as inclusive capitalism, is a centralization program which links together governments, bureaucratic agencies, NGOs as well as international banks and corporations under one ideological umbrella (globalism, multiculturalism, DEI, climate change, etc). This massive cartel uses monetary incentives and extortion to force businesses and individuals to conform..."​

LOL. I told you that the OP doesn't know what the word "woke" actually means and then you quote the OP. Circular reasoning much?

 

[PAF]

LOL. I told you that the OP doesn't know what the word "woke" actually means and then you quote the OP. Circular reasoning much?

What do I know, I just saw the article and reposted it because I liked it

 

[jmdrake]

What do I know, I just saw the article and reposted it because I liked it

LOL. Sorry for shooting the messenger. I do think the term "woke" has been culturally appropriated (oops...that sounds "woke" by the culturally appropriated meaning), but the same think has happened with "libertarian." Remember when Peter Thiel was praised here as being the "libertarian" billionaire? I don't think the issue is the terminology so much as it is the manipulative intent of those who grift onto it.

 

[PAF]

LOL. Sorry for shooting the messenger. I do think the term "woke" has been culturally appropriated (oops...that sounds "woke" by the culturally appropriated meaning), but the same think has happened with "libertarian." Remember when Peter Thiel was praised here as being the "libertarian" billionaire? I don't think the issue is the terminology so much as it is the manipulative intent of those who grift onto it.

You can shoot me all you want, I have said before that I appreciate being corrected if/when-I-need-to-be

Fully aware. That's because Thiel is not. He's the redefining-libertarianism kind, which isn't libertarian at all.

So then you agree with @Madison320 in Post #9 just like me

 

[Firestarter]

Woke capitalism, also known as inclusive capitalism, is a centralization program which links together governments, bureaucratic agencies, NGOs as well as international banks and corporations under one ideological umbrella (globalism, multiculturalism, DEI, climate change, etc). This massive cartel uses monetary incentives and extortion to force businesses and individuals to conform to a woke/socialist model.

I didn't know that "woke capitalism" is a known concept.
Ultimately all of these umbrella terms serve to sell technocracy to us...

The GPFI of the G20 is another organisation that promotes Queen Maxima’s “inclusive finance” agenda.
Of course the Dutch royals controlled Vatican also plays a role in this scheme through the Vatican’s Council for Inclusive Capitalism…

The Vatican’s Council for Inclusive Capitalism includes such famous “guardians” as Lynn Forester de Rothschild (the co-founder), William P. Lauder (of the infamous Lauder family), Mark Carney (the notorious eco-fascist) and Rajiv Shah (president Rockefeller foundation) that are all so very concerned with overpopulation...
With to the left of Pope Francis (in white): Lynn Forester and Mark Carney, with William Lauder 3 spots to the left of Carney, December 2020.

The Lauder Foundation has employed Princess Laurentien of the Netherlands and Lynn Forester de Rothschild…

Marc Benioff is also a guardian of the Council for Inclusive Capitalism.

Post in thread 'Technocracy, Elon Musk, Eugenics'

Mar 9, 2025

BooHoo, the left's invasion is being stopped and reversed, BooHoo!

I oppose all colours of political propaganda, including “left”, which is all a charade to enslave the masses.

There is nothing particularly “left” or “right” about technocracy, or the opposition to it.
It doesn’t really matter whether the technocratic open prison is implemented under the guise of climate change, aiding the poor, national security or efficiency…

In general only the “alternative” media seem to publish stories on the dangers of technocracy. These media are predominantly pro-Putin, pro-Trump and right...

• Firestarter

 

[devil21]

It's interesting that "woke" is dying as a mainstream publicized narrative yet new tv/streaming shows still maintain a mostly woke appearance. What I have noticed is the narrative of black male/white woman is slowly being replaced by Asian-Indian male/white women and the same for Asian-Indian female/white male. The shift is, of course, being pushed primarily to 20-something females via netflix et al, who are being flooded with school age Asian-Indian peers. Check out netflix's highly pushed The Summer I Became Pretty show to see it in action. It's being gobbled up by the 20-somethings.