MSNBC is Rebranding

[CaptUSA]

MSNBC will soon be called:

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/18/comcast-versant-rename-msnbc-peacock-logos.html

MSNBC will change its name later this year and drop the storied peacock image from its branding — the first real public-facing changes in Versant’s upcoming separation from Comcast’s NBCUniversal.

The political news network will be renamed My Source News Opinion World, or MS Now, Versant Chief Executive Officer Mark Lazarus wrote in an internal memo to employees that was seen by CNBC.

In January, Lazarus told a group of MSNBC staffers that the network wouldn’t change its name. But during the past few months of transition planning, NBCUniversal leaders decided MSNBC should take on a new name “to accelerate the distinction between the MSNBC and NBC News organizations,” Lazarus wrote in the memo Monday.

MSNBC President Rebecca Kutler added in her own note to employees that the news group’s focus won’t change.

“While our name will be changing, who we are and what we do will not. Our commitment to our work and our audiences will not waiver from what the brand promise has been for three decades,” she wrote.

It'll be gone soon.

 

[PAF]

It'll be gone soon.

Where will 'Merika get it's "newz" from.

'Israel’s Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS'

Aug 14, 2025

By Alan MacLeod
MintPress News
August 14, 2025


After reaching an agreement with President Trump, David Ellison—the son of the second-richest man in the world, Larry Ellison—has acquired Paramount Global, the media giant that owns CBS News.

Larry Ellison, the largest private funder of the Israel Defense Forces, is deeply tied to the Israeli national security state and counts Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu among his closest friends.

David has already announced significant changes at CBS, promising “unbiased” news coverage and “varied ideological perspectives,” which...

• PAF
• Replies: 1
• Forum: U.S. Political News

• 

 

[CaptUSA]

Where will 'Merika get it's "newz" from.

Network news still hasn't fully gotten the message... They're done. Their time is over. And that's a good thing!

But there are some issues with the transition... As their money dries up, so will their resources. And it's not clear how their resources to gather the news will be replaced. What is clear is that delivering the news will be more decentralized.

 

[PAF]

Network news still hasn't fully gotten the message... They're done. Their time is over. And that's a good thing!

But there are some issues with the transition... As their money dries up, so will their resources. And it's not clear how their resources to gather the news will be replaced. What is clear is that delivering the news will be more decentralized.

Still a loooooooooooooong way to go. For the most part [if not all part] they all center on the Keynesian economic model, promotion/support of the state, etc., and not the principles/foundations of liberty. Typical Americans will still be indoctrinated, one way and the other.

[get books from Mises.org, one way and the other, donate to public libraries ]

 

[Snowball]

MS NOW - is it a Multiple Sclerosis community channel?

 

[Anti Federalist]

MS NOW - is it a Multiple Sclerosis community channel?

That's exactly what I first thought.

 

[Occam's Banana]

 

[TheTexan]

Is that supposed to be a flag of some sort? It sure as shit ain't an American flag

 

[Occam's Banana]

 

[Occam's Banana]

Is that supposed to be a flag of some sort? It sure as shit ain't an American flag

https://x.com/michaelmalice/status/1957537727118995756

 

[Snowball]

Why would they drop NBC but not MS which was originally for Microsoft ?

Meh.

 

[Anti Globalist]

Rebranding themselves won't change anything since they'll still be called fake news.

 

[TheCount]

Network news still hasn't fully gotten the message... They're done. Their time is over. And that's a good thing!

But there are some issues with the transition... As their money dries up, so will their resources. And it's not clear how their resources to gather the news will be replaced. What is clear is that delivering the news will be more decentralized.

It's still very profitable telling people what they want to hear - especially if you have a large donor who is happy to bankroll your flavor of lie.

See also: OANN, RSBN, etc

 

[TheTexan]

See also: OANN, RSBN, etc

Those networks have only the highest journalistic integrity

 

[acptulsa]

Why would they drop NBC but not MS which was originally for Microsoft ?

Bill Gates has money.

 

[oyarde]

Is that supposed to be a flag of some sort? It sure as shit ain't an American flag

No , it is a WW2 German Artillery officer collar tab. Some members of my family took these as trophies once they were forbidden to take scalps. That and SS rings and Lugers got you the most at poker table. I guess someone thought it would be funny to use nazi artillery collar tab flag while calling everyone else nazis

 

[PAF]

Is that supposed to be a flag of some sort? It sure as shit ain't an American flag

No , it is a WW2 German Artillery officer collar tab. Some members of my family took these as trophies once they were forbidden to take scalps. That and SS rings and Lugers got you the most at poker table

Could be.

To me, it looks like a subliminal variation of an AIPAC symbol, but who knows.

 

[acptulsa]

 

[Madison320]

Network news still hasn't fully gotten the message... They're done. Their time is over. And that's a good thing!

But there are some issues with the transition... As their money dries up, so will their resources. And it's not clear how their resources to gather the news will be replaced. What is clear is that delivering the news will be more decentralized.

MSNBC and Fox News don't bother me as much because pretty much everyone knows they're biased. The annoying ones are CNN, PBS, CBS, NBC and ABC. They still pretend to be neutral.

 

[acptulsa]