GLENN BECK TALKS CRUZ SEX SCANDAL: ‘I WAS RAPED BY TED CRUZ’

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

GLENN BECK TALKS CRUZ SEX SCANDAL: ‘I WAS RAPED BY TED CRUZ’

On Glenn Beck’s show Monday morning, Beck made a particularly strange and off-color joke about how he and his crew were all “raped by Ted Cruz,” referring to the Republican presidential candidate’s “Cuban fire” that Beck and his crew experienced during a recent interview. The rape joke comes at the top of Glenn Beck’s Monday morning show on conservative outlet the Blaze, and a bit later, Beck addresses the rumors of the supposed Ted Cruz sex scandal by suggesting that Ted Cruz doesn’t have enough game for five mistresses.

“I have to tell you, it’s been a hard Monday morning. We’ve all been raped by Ted Cruz,” Glenn Beck said during his online show this morning.

One of his co-hosts chimed in, “You can’t rape the willing, and we were all willing".

http://www.inquisitr.com/2936531/glenn-beck-talks-cruz-sex-scandal-i-was-raped-by-ted-cruz/

Pretty pessimistic sounding article.

 

[jkob]

Beck is a weird son of a bitch

 

[jmdrake]

Donald Trump will be the GOP nominee. The Clinton/Sanders unity ticket will stomp the Trump/Christie-Carson-Kasick-Rubio-Whoever unity ticket into the ground. It's okay. I checked my passport and it's still good.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/op...akes-off-as-senator-fails-to-forcefully-deny/

Let me begin with this. If the National Enquirer wrote a story about me cheating on my wife with five women, I had better be extremely definitive in my response; because if I’m not, my wife –smelling the guilt – would kick my ass. OK, let me also tell you that I wouldn’t be angry; in fact, I’d be ecstatic. It’s fun to count money from guaranteed punitive and compensatory damages in a multimillion dollar lawsuit.

But that’s me. I can’t speak for Senator Ted Cruz except to say that so far his reaction seems —well, not exactly definitive. He calls it “garbage and false,” not exactly a denial. Then he plays the victim, calling it an attack on his family; “offensive to Heidi and me, they’re offensive to our daughters,” he writes.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

Beck is a weird son of a bitch

Putting all of Beck's comments together, Cruz was chosen by the God of kolob and joseph smith to liven up the election!

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

Donald Trump will be the GOP nominee. The Clinton/Sanders unity ticket will stomp the Trump/Christie-Carson-Kasick-Rubio-Whoever unity ticket into the ground. It's okay. I checked my passport and it's still good.

Don't know, Drudge is starting on the Clinton scandals, and Hillary is being investigating for her emails, and ultimately, her role in a death of an ambassador.

 

[brushfire]

Glenn Beck? Who's he?

 

[jmdrake]

Don't know, Drudge is starting on the Clinton scandals, and Hillary is being investigating for her emails, and ultimately, her role in a death of an ambassador.

LOL. If you think Drudge is just "starting" on the Clinton scandals than you must have just started reading Drudge. The whole "Clinton bodycount" list goes back to when Bill was president. And it's a known fact that Bill was palling around with a now convicted pedophile. The 43% of voters who are going to vote for Hillary will vote for her no matter what. The 36% that vote for Trump will vote for him no matter what. The rest who don't like either will most likely vote for people like Gary Johnson or some other third party isn't going to win anyway candidate.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

LOL. If you think Drudge is just "starting" on the Clinton scandals than you must have just started reading Drudge. The whole "Clinton bodycount" list goes back to when Bill was presiden.

I may have started one of the first body count lists. I always thought Drudge was stealing from me when he *just* got started. According to a book, he got his start on TWA 800 in a newsletter (not later website) - that was actually my and Michael Rivero's baby, and I still see things said that only originated from us on it. And the last post I ever posted on the Clintons was a dead body and obvious looking murder, and years later the wife of the man who died wrote a book thinking that too - and she wasn't saying it back then.

No, I just meant the most obvious way of taking what I said.

Today, Drudge started putting a lot of Clinton scandals back on his page.

It's politically significant. It means Drudge thinks Cruz is toast as far as even causing trouble at the convention.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

http://www.wnd.com/2007/11/44397/

In a new book alleging a campaign of slander and intimidation orchestrated chiefly by Hillary Clinton, Kathleen Willey points a finger of suspicion at the former first couple for the death of her husband, who was believed to have killed himself.

Willey, who claims she was groped by President Clinton in the White House, acknowledged in an interview with WND today that she stands by the speculation she poses about her husband’s demise. 11/05/2007

There was a lot of evidence pointing to that back in 1998 too. That's 9 years before she went public.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

ie Gideon's Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad 1999 - Amazon ...
www.amazon.com › ... › Intelligence & Espionage
Amazon.com, Inc.
Created in 1951 to ensure the future of an embattled Israel, Mossad is ... how TWA Flight 800 was ruthlessly exploited by the Mossad, and most explosive of all, ...

I believe mentions where they think Drudge got his start. Right or wrong, it confirmed some of the other things I thought at the time.

 

[jmdrake]

I may have started one of the first body count lists. I always thought Drudge was stealing from me when he *just* got started. According to a book, he got his start on TWA 800 in a newsletter (not later website) - that was actually my and Michael Rivero's baby, and I still see things said that only originated from us on it. And the last post I ever posted on the Clintons was a dead body and obvious looking murder, and years later the wife of the man who died wrote a book thinking that too - and she wasn't saying it back then.

No, I just meant the most obvious way of taking what I said.

Today, Drudge started putting a lot of Clinton scandals back on his page.

It's politically significant. It means Drudge thinks Cruz is toast as far as even causing trouble at the convention.

Ummmm.....you're not making any sense. You responded to my saying Trump will be the nominee and Clinton/Sanders will stomp Trump/Whoever with "Drudge is pushing Clinton scandals." I respond with "Clinton scandals are as old as dirt and have had not history of destroying either Bill or Hill and you came back with "Drudge believes Cruz is toast." Ummmmm...okay. But I already said Trump will most likely be the nominee. So...your point is what exactly?

 

[Cleaner44]

Donald Trump will be the GOP nominee. The Clinton/Sanders unity ticket will stomp the Trump/Christie-Carson-Kasick-Rubio-Whoever unity ticket into the ground. It's okay. I checked my passport and it's still good.

Are you interested in a $10 bet? I think Trump is going to destroy Hilary in the general election and will put money on it.

 

[cajuncocoa]

Glenn Beck? Who's he?

He who is always coming around.

 

[brushfire]

He who is always coming around.

Oh yea, that guy.

 

[jmdrake]

Are you interested in a $10 bet? I think Trump is going to destroy Hilary in the general election and will put money on it.

And you're basing this belief on what exactly? Hillary could lose if she gets indicted after securing the nomination.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

Ummmm.....you're not making any sense. You responded

No, you said Clinton would be the nominee, and I said I didn't think that was necessarily true, considering how Sanders is doing and scandals.

Then you said I must not read Drudge, and used a Clinton body count list as an example, and I said I might have started one of the first lists;
and I remember when Drudge first got started, and appeared to be copying things. He didn't have his website, or fame from monica lewinsky, (itself someone else's story) until later.

You aren't making any sense. It started with "You must not read Drudge", which is a pointless personal statement in a rational conversation. As it turned out, it was also really off.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

And you're basing this belief on what exactly? Hillary could lose if she gets indicted after securing the nomination.

[To someone else]

Look, why don't you just go someplace else today and chill. You're being really rude, and asserting opinion as fact. You just did it to me, and now you're doing it to someone else.

 

[jmdrake]

[To someone else]

Look, why don't you just go someplace else today and chill. You're being really rude, and asserting opinion as fact. You just did it to me, and now you're doing it to someone else.

What is rude about asking someone what they are basing their belief that Trump will crush Hillary on when all of the facts are (currently) that Hillary will stomp Trump. That's not my "opinion." That's the polls. You know, the same polls that show Trump will most likely beat Cruz? You Trump supporters are acting like freaking cultists. Anytime anyone challenges your pseudo religious beliefs you guys get offended. It's not logical. It's not rational. And no, in this thread I have not been the least bit rude. (At least not yet). So what you are doing is not honest either.

 

[jmdrake]

No, you said Clinton would be the nominee, and I said I didn't think that was necessarily true, considering how Sanders is doing and scandals.

Sure. Sanders could possibly beat Clinton. But that's highly unlikely and I think we both know that. But maybe not. Cruz could possibly beat Trump as well. I think Cruz has as much chance at beating Trump as Sanders has of beating Clinton. I honestly didn't think you were questioning the "Clinton will be the nominee" argument until this post. Sorry for missing that I guess.

Here's the bottom line. These scandals will not all stop Hillary from beating Sanders. What would stop Hillary is if she actually gets indicted. If that happens enough super delegates will leave Hillary and got to Sanders. If not, they won't. Now apparently my stating my "opinion as fact" is somehow rude but you can just say whatever you want? Okay. You have the right to feel that way. And I have the right to think you are the one being rude.

Then you said I must not read Drudge, and used a Clinton body count list as an example, and I said I might have started one of the first lists;
and I remember when Drudge first got started, and appeared to be copying things. He didn't have his website, or fame from monica lewinsky, (itself someone else's story) until later.

You said Drudge was "starting" with the Hillary scandals. I'm saying Drudge has been doing Hillary scandals for as long as Drudge has been doing Drudge.