GLENN BECK TALKS CRUZ SEX SCANDAL: ‘I WAS RAPED BY TED CRUZ’

[hells_unicorn]

Glenn Beck is sorely mistaken if he thinks that "game" is how politicians acquire mistresses. Bill Clinton has ZERO GAME, because if he had any, he would not have been accused of rape/harassment by his former "mistresses", and he would have done a bit better than Hilldog. The same generally holds true for all others in elected office, "power" is the key word here, not "game". Game is convincing women to fall for you through means other than power and influence, hence why most renowned pick-up artists don't have to use force or ideological influence to get around.

 

[twomp]

[To someone else]

Look, why don't you just go someplace else today and chill. You're being really rude, and asserting opinion as fact. You just did it to me, and now you're doing it to someone else.

Have you ever read what you wrote and thought, "Why am I such a crybaby?"

 

[Cleaner44]

And you're basing this belief on what exactly? Hillary could lose if she gets indicted after securing the nomination.

There are many factors that lead me to this conclusion. It is just my prediction, but I think it is accurate. For one, I think she has about as much chance of winning as McCain did in 2008. I thought his defeat as well as Romney's defeat were very predictable. Now I am predicting that Trump will beat Hilary fairly easily.

Are you interested in the bet or not? No biggie either way.

 

[RonPaulGeorge&Ringo]

Hillary will stomp Trump. That's not my "opinion." That's the polls.

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/26/us/dukakis-lead-widens-according-to-new-poll.html

July 1988
Dukakis 55%
Bush 38%

It's not logical. It's not rational. ... not honest either.

 

[jmdrake]

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/26/us/dukakis-lead-widens-according-to-new-poll.html

July 1988
Dukakis 55%
Bush 38%

Uh-huh. Unless Hillary has a "Willie Horton" nobody knows about that comparison is meaningless. The attacks on Dukakis worked because they came out of left field and Dukakis didn't respond. Every scandal you and others keep bringing up are well known. And the Clintons know how to respond to attacks. Also you keep acting like Donald Trump is squeaky clean. Newflash, he isn't. He's doing well right now because the plurality, not majority of republicans who support him don't give a crap about anything he says or does. Just look at his support on this forum. People like you lie and neg rep whenever people like me point out his inconsistencies. Or worse, some of his supports say "The fact that he's inconsistent proves that he's not a puppet so we can trust him." Well this is something you should "trust." Hillary Clinton's supporters are just as die hard "I will support my candidate no matter what" as you are. So here's your problem. In the general election, people who aren't "die hard" supporters like you aren't going to let Trump get away with the crap that you insist with every fiber in your being he be allowed to get away with. They are going to look at the fact that his stance on the H1B visa program didn't even stay current with his own website and decide they can't trust him. When he talks about Hillary's connections with the CFR, they are going to look at his connections with the CFR and shake their heads. When the look at the fact that Trump said bring back the "good illegal immigrants rapidly" they will realize he was talking about most illegal immigrants and see his immigration plan for the sham that it is. And many of them won't agree with it anyway.

But you know what's the funniest about all of this? I responded to false bravado of your fellow Trump supporters saying "Trump is the only one that can beat Hillary" and "Trump will stomp Hillary into the ground" by pointing out the polls showing that other candidates, including Ted Cruz, do a much better job against Hillary than Donald Trump. If Trump can "stomp" Hillary, than why can't some other republican who's already beating Hillary?

 

[AngryCanadian]

Donald Trump will be the GOP nominee. The Clinton/Sanders unity ticket will stomp the Trump/Christie-Carson-Kasick-Rubio-Whoever unity ticket into the ground. It's okay. I checked my passport and it's still good.

Your welcomed to Canada.

 

[Jan2017]

Beck is a weird son of a bitch

it is a shock jock way to try to defuse the elements of truth so again, Beck will obfuscate to hide what maybe
the Atlanta talkshow host with his source deep in the Cruz campaign reportedly actually DO know of actual details of Ted 'Night Owl' Cruz.

But, Beck is right . . . Ted Cruz has raped the United States in whole - jus' wondering which of the pay back methods Teddy prefers now.

 

[jmdrake]

There are many factors that lead me to this conclusion. It is just my prediction, but I think it is accurate. For one, I think she has about as much chance of winning as McCain did in 2008. I thought his defeat as well as Romney's defeat were very predictable. Now I am predicting that Trump will beat Hilary fairly easily.

Are you interested in the bet or not? No biggie either way.

Sure. Do I win the bet if Trump doesn't even get the GOP nomination and never gets the chance to take on Hillary? Based on Trump's recent nosedive (losing to Cruz now by 10 points in Wisconsin) post this so called "sex scandal" I really don't think he will even be the nominee. He will not get enough delegates to win outright. The only way that might be possible is if Kasich drops out. But if that happens, Cruz will more likely clinch the nomination. Trump has maxed out in his support. There was one poll with him at 53%, but now he's back down to around 45%. That's one helluva drop. With Hillary now beating Trump by a whopping 11% (it was 6.3% just a couple of months ago) there's no way in hell that the delegates not already pledged to Trump will swing his way. And may GOP voters are souring on him now as seen by his reversal of fortunes in Wisconsin. (In February he was beating Cruz there.) Sanders could possibly beat Hillary as well. What happens to the bet then?

 

[jmdrake]

Your welcomed to Canada.

Thanks. But I think I'll head to the Bahamas. I like the weather there better. (Yeah I'm a wimp. We get 8 inches of snow where I live and the whole city shuts down. That's light flurries for you guys.)

Still though, it is ironic that African American slaves once ran to Canada to escape slavery and the entire U.S. is slowly becoming one giant slave state.

 

[Cleaner44]

Sure. Do I win the bet if Trump doesn't even get the GOP nomination and never gets the chance to take on Hillary? Based on Trump's recent nosedive (losing to Cruz now by 10 points in Wisconsin) post this so called "sex scandal" I really don't think he will even be the nominee. He will not get enough delegates to win outright. The only way that might be possible is if Kasich drops out. But if that happens, Cruz will more likely clinch the nomination. Trump has maxed out in his support. There was one poll with him at 53%, but now he's back down to around 45%. That's one helluva drop. With Hillary now beating Trump by a whopping 11% (it was 6.3% just a couple of months ago) there's no way in hell that the delegates not already pledged to Trump will swing his way. And may GOP voters are souring on him now as seen by his reversal of fortunes in Wisconsin. (In February he was beating Cruz there.) Sanders could possibly beat Hillary as well. What happens to the bet then?

Let's keep it simple. A $10 bet on Hilary vs Trump. If either are not the nominee of their party, the bet is off.

My $10 says that Trump beats Hilary in the general election. Good?

 

[AZJoe]

Now Glen Beck can proclaim he was CRUZified.