Glenn Beck Program Bans Any Talk Of Trump

[jj-]

I didn't think we did the 'lesser evil' thing around here.

Didn't many here support you despite being in favor of food labeling laws? If so, you were just the lesser of evils.

 

[Spikender]

Didn't many here support you despite being in favor of food labeling laws? If so, you were just the lesser of evils.

To be fair, we can't agree on everything, and food labeling is just one issue.

The "lesser of two evils" thing to me means that a person has a pretty significant amount of things you disagree on/find horrendous but they are still better than the alternative.

 

[AuH20]

I see it more as 'drop a frag grenade in the GOP's lap' as opposed to the lesser of two evils.

 

[jj-]

I see it more as 'drop a frag grenade in the GOP's lap' as opposed to the lesser of two evils.

Exactly. Many people can't grasp that a lot of Trump's support is just to discombobulate the GOP establishment.

 

[kahless]

I didn't think we did the 'lesser evil' thing around here.

I have ended up voting 3rd party since the 90s rather than support the lesser. If this is a chance to break the back of the Republican establishment and the media I will take it. 3rd party or sitting home and allowing Jeb to take it gets us no where.

He was adamantly pro abortion until he decided to run for the Republican nomination.,,,,,,,,,

Not really, what I posted shows 2011. It may or may not go back further than that, I just have not checked. Same with healthcare. I do not discount what you are saying, like the rest we could be getting played.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

I see it more as 'drop a frag grenade in the GOP's lap' as opposed to the lesser of two evils.

Exactly. Many people can't grasp that a lot of Trump's support is just to discombobulate the GOP establishment.

To what end?

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Didn't many here support you despite being in favor of food labeling laws? If so, you were just the lesser of evils.

Shows how poorly you pay attention. Doesn't surprise me really. My position was not to require food labeling of any kind, but that if you did label you had to tell the truth, that lying is fraud. Therefore you could not call a GMO tomato with frog genes a 'tomato,' because it is not in fact a tomato. Sell it as a frogmato, or a GMO tomato, but to just call it a 'tomato' when it has genes from a frog is fraud.

Nothi g about that requires food labeling, GMO or otherwise. It simply requires that if you are going to identify the contents of your food, that you have to tell the truth. To sell food and lie about the ingredients is fraud.

It doesn't surprise me that you are a Trump guy given your utter lack of capacity for paying attention or retaining what you have observed, or your outright internal distortion of what you observe to suit your own whims.

 

[jj-]

I see, so you wanted the government to put irrational burdens on food producers. You were at best then the lesser of two evils. It's kinda arrogant to say you weren't the lesser of evils, because that would mean you were perfect, lol.

It doesn't surprise me that you are a Trump supporter

Except that I won't vote for Trump, as I said so you seem to not be able to pay attention. Supporting some of things he does such as attacking McCain I do. I hope this post was short enough for you to pay attention and understand.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Except that I won't vote for Trump, as I said so you seem to not be able to pay attention. Supporting some of things he does such as attacking McCain I support. I hope this post was short enough for you to pay attention and understand.

you have been all over like three, four, five? threads singing Trump's praises on every little thing, now why would you do that if you don't want him to win?

 

[jj-]

you have been all over like three, four, five? threads singing Trump's praises on every little thing, now why would you do that if you don't want him to win?

fun? laughs? sometimes opportunities to back up the principles behind some of the things he is doing? make people think about the advantages of bilateral trade agreements over multicountry trade agreements, which is one the things that only Trump mentioned? It might encourage Rand to try to favor bilateral trade agreements over multi country trade agreements.

To be fair, grasping all these aspects requires thinking, something that you at least haven't had time to do when reading many posts before reacting.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

fun? laughs? sometimes opportunities to back up the principles behind some of the things he is doing? make people think about the advantages of bilateral trade agreements over multicountry trade agreements, which is one the things that only Trump mentioned? It might encourage Rand to try to favor bilateral trade agreements over multi country trade agreements.

To be fair, grasping all these aspects requires thinking, something that you at least haven't had time to do when reading many posts before reacting.

Attitude like that and you wonder why I think you are a jackass. You are a lot like Trump. It makes sense why you'd be all over him.

 

[jj-]

threads singing Trump's praises

Saying that one is less bad than another is not singing praises. It's telling that you exaggerate to criticize me. I typically said he is less bad on this than others. Whatever praise I used was mild, the most I recall saying was that he is energetic, hardly 'singing praises'.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Anybody who supports Trump is completely devoid of principle. Trump is an antigun pro-abortion socialized healthcare nutjob who helped engineer the Pelosi-Reid majorities and helped install Terry McAuliffe as governor of Virginia, and gave six figures to Shillary when she was not in any position to help him. He buys eminent domain condemnations, and is about as far from libertarianism or constitutionalism as one can possibly get. This whackjob is a progressive liberal socialist who is just telling people whatever the f they want to hear.

I know...I'm LMFAO off at this...the Stupid Party may very well nominate another version of Mike Doomberg.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

...dup

 

[r3volution 3.0]

you have been all over like three, four, five? threads singing Trump's praises on every little thing...

Eleven; he's posted eleven threads in recent weeks on Trump: some explicitly pro-Trump, some neutral, none critical.

the principles behind some of the things [Trump] is doing

 

[jj-]

As the more calm, levelheaded readers I'm sure understand, I'm referring to the principles that can back up the position, not necessarily that Trump defends those principles.

When Trump talked about bilateral trade agreements, I used that as an opportunity to at least mention that bilateral trade agreements are preferable to multicountry trade agreements. I use the opportunity that the news of the day provides to mention something that hardly ever is mentioned.

When Rand or Ron where in the news I posted many threads about them, just look up my threads in the previous years. I get what Rand is trying to do but his language is more aimed at the moderate voters and too boring to many of us. I'm not criticizing because that's what wins elections, it's just that to me it isn't enlightening or entertaining to watch him.

 

[Foreigner]

Does anybody here really believe that Trump would put America above himself? Sure, he is entertaining, but also a borderline or actual psychopath. Why?

- He's completely megalomaniacal, and constantly bragging about himself (The world's best negotiator, the best military stategist... )
- He's a pathalogical lier, reinventing facts, and refusing to admit to anything he previously did - even if it was on camera
- He has no empathy, and takes pleasure in inflicting pain upon others (firing them, or throwing lawsuits at people who don't have the finances to fight back)
- He's been married 3 times (not THAT uncommon, but it adds up)
- He has serious anger management issues, whenever somebody disagrees with him, he hurls insult after insult and threathens them

 

[r3volution 3.0]

^^^Nor, even if he were well-intended (which he clearly is not), is there any indication that he has a clue about policy. I don't think the man has ever given any real thought to any of the issues. He just makes up whatever bullshit he thinks will play best with the audience at hand, which explains his chronic flip-flopping. Basically, take any soulless establishment politician, put a dead cat on his head, feed him a steady dose of high-grade amphetamine for a couple decades, and you get Trump.

 

[fr33]

Does anybody here really believe that Trump would put America above himself? Sure, he is entertaining, but also a borderline or actual psychopath. Why?

- He's completely megalomaniacal, and constantly bragging about himself (The world's best negotiator, the best military stategist... )
- He's a pathalogical lier, reinventing facts, and refusing to admit to anything he previously did - even if it was on camera
- He has no empathy, and takes pleasure in inflicting pain upon others (firing them, or throwing lawsuits at people who don't have the finances to fight back)
- He's been married 3 times (not THAT uncommon, but it adds up)
- He has serious anger management issues, whenever somebody disagrees with him, he hurls insult after insult and threathens them

This. And I welcome anyone to find me a video or transcript where Trump talks about supporting constitutional rights or any other kind of rights.

 

[EBounding]

This. And I welcome anyone to find me a video or transcript where Trump talks about supporting constitutional rights or any other kind of rights.

That doesn't matter! We just need someone tuff to fix the problem!

I've never see so many people in so much denial:

I just...I don't even....