George Zimmerman Verdict: NOT GUILTY!

[amy31416]

so Trayvon was stalking Zimmerman now, it makes sense now.

There was mutual stalking, it seems. But only one attacked.

You haven't really followed the case, have you?

 

[ClydeCoulter]

so Trayvon was stalking Zimmerman now, it makes sense now.

Damn SP, it wasn't beyond a reasonable doubt of innocence, but of guilt.

 

[brushfire]

The captivation reminded me of:

 

[matt0611]

so Trayvon was stalking Zimmerman now, it makes sense now.

I can't believe you people are siding with Zimmerman, he is just as bad as the bully cops out there that we fight against, who kill dogs/people/squirrel/anything that 'intimidates' them.

Stalking has a legal definition. What GZ did was not considered "stalking" legally speaking.

 

[rockandrollsouls]

No, he hasn't. Just a troll. Nothing to see here.

There was mutual stalking, it seems. But only one attacked.

You haven't really followed the case, have you?

 

[FrankRep]

so Trayvon was stalking Zimmerman now, it makes sense now.

What actually happened:

The evidence showed that Zimmerman was heading back to his car. Trayvon circled him and then attacked him and proceeded to beat the hell out of him. Trayvon was not the innocent child that the media tried their best to portray.

 

[RickyJ]

Trayvon clearly punched him at least once, but he didn't beat the hell out of him. That's hyperbole in the extreme. Zimmerman would have several broken facial bones, several cuts, and clear facial swelling had he been beaten badly. Doesn't change that Martin was on top of him and struck him at least once, however. Plus the contact with the concrete.

It all depends on where Trayvon was hitting him. If he was hitting him in the chest then you obviously would see that on the face.

 

[Don Lapre]

analyze what you just said. Evidence of someone feeling something, if that someone is dead. No, there can't be.

Then what has you assuming that Trayvon did feel threatened?

 

[squarepusher]

There was mutual stalking, it seems. But only one attacked.

You haven't really followed the case, have you?

So from an objective perspective, if 2 parties were mutually stalking eachother (which for the record I think is a ridiculous claim), then wouldn't it be correct to say the person who exited their vehicle with a loaded weapon was the one who attacked? Or was Zimmerman just stepping out to do some pushups and sprints, and viciously attacked by ruthless hooligan Trayvon??

 

[green73]

Cnn attacking the defense. LOL

 

[amy31416]

No, he hasn't. Just a troll. Nothing to see here.

I don't think he's a troll, I just don't think he followed the case at all and has some bad 3rd hand info.

 

[ClydeCoulter]

Damn SP, it wasn't beyond a reasonable doubt of innocence, but of guilt.

this SquarePusher

 

[amy31416]

So from an objective perspective, if 2 parties were mutually stalking eachother (which for the record I think is a ridiculous claim), then wouldn't it be correct to say the person who exited their vehicle with a loaded weapon was the one who attacked? Or was Zimmerman just stepping out to do some pushups and sprints, and viciously attacked by ruthless hooligan Trayvon??

Man--I'm not going to write the Cliff's Notes version of this entire trial. All the info is out there, go with the facts as much as possible and stay away from any obviously left/right websites.

It seems you don't know much about it--not saying that to be rude, but it's just obvious, and I haven't followed it nearly as much as many here.

 

[matt0611]

So from an objective perspective, if 2 parties were mutually stalking eachother (which for the record I think is a ridiculous claim), then wouldn't it be correct to say the person who exited their vehicle with a loaded weapon was the one who attacked? Or was Zimmerman just stepping out to do some pushups and sprints, and viciously attacked by ruthless hooligan Trayvon??

Why do the people that side with TM always resort to ridiculous statements?

He got out of his car and he was armed. And????? That's not a crime to be armed!! Its not a crime to follow someone in a public street! And its NOT a crime to follow someone while armed in a public street.

If I see you on the street and decide to follow you I can legally do that while armed. That is NOT stalking. That is NOT a crime!

What don't you get? This has been rehashed over and over and over.

GZ got out of his car to find the street he was near (read the nearby street sign) so the police could get there.

 

[RickyJ]

Defending himself? So how come it isn't OK for Trayvon to kill Zimmerman with his fists in self defense? How did Zimmerman get out of his car when we was stalking Trayvon with a loaded weapon?



ok, Trayvon is not allowed to stand his ground?

How the heck is it self defense when he was the one on top hitting him while Zimmerman was the one of the ground screaming? You aren't going by the facts of this case at all. Why even post about it?

 

[satchelmcqueen]

ok ill tell you what. come to my place at night where you shouldnt be and see if i dont follow your ass until you leave or give me a damn good well mannered reason for being there. if you convince me ill go home. if not, ill stay right there until the cops come and ask you what the hell youre doing there. and if you punch me, ill try my best to whip your ass until the threat is done. am i supposed to just lay in wait until you have your way with me? come on man.,

how is it self defense, if he stalked this kid in his car, with a gun, and come out at him? Seems like he picked a fight with a gun against an unarmed kid and lost, then pulled to shoot.

 

[RickyJ]

I don't think he's a troll, I just don't think he followed the case at all and has some bad 3rd hand info.

That's worse than being a troll IMO. Trying to argue for a point you have little knowledge about is not too bright.

 

[squarepusher]

ok ill tell you what. come to my place at night where you shouldnt be and see if i dont follow your ass until you leave or give me a damn good well mannered reason for being there. if you convince me ill go home. if not, ill stay right there until the cops come and ask you what the hell youre doing there. and if you punch me, ill try my best to whip your ass until the threat is done. am i supposed to just lay in wait until you have your way with me? come on man.,

you would go down like a sack of bricks if I punched you, and you would probably have to pull out your gun

Man--I'm not going to write the Cliff's Notes version of this entire trial. All the info is out there, go with the facts as much as possible and stay away from any obviously left/right websites.

It seems you don't know much about it--not saying that to be rude, but it's just obvious, and I haven't followed it nearly as much as many here.

Amy you haven't provided a single piece of evidence to backup your claims, but you try to come off as all knowing but you are really lacking substance.

Just like when LE made the claim "he was going back to his car" and you said it was based off GPS data (which isn't true). So which cliff notes are you reading, Fox News version?

 

[Natural Citizen]

you would go down like a sack of bricks if I punched you, and you would probably have to pull out your gun

Heh. This guy....

 

[satchelmcqueen]

video in pm please. i must go to bed. lol

Zimmerman's bro is destroying slimeball Piers.