Genetic Modification Gone Wild: 10 Signs That Our World May Be Destined To Resemble A Real

[Cutlerzzz]

I will lecture whoever and however I want. Nice try playing pretend with my intentions on that thread. Somehow you think that makes the NWO irrelevant...

I'm sure you intend well. I just don't think you understand much.

 

[donnay]

I'm sure you intend well. I just don't think you understand much.

 

[John F Kennedy III]

LOL. +rep

 

[libertygrl]

I've heard he had Globalist connections, I've yet to research it though.

As a member of the Fabian Socialists, HG Wells supported a gradualistic take over of the world system with the end game being establishment of a totalitarian socialist global system.

His book, "War of the Worlds" is a metaphor of the Open Conspiracy with a twist. The Martian Invasion was drastic, visible, and sudden and ended in their defeat by earth´s own immunological controls. The Open Conspiracy is, however, a call for a more subtle "gentler and kinder invasion" where the invasion is gradual, unseen, and incremental... so to stay below the level of the immunological reaction of the world´s population. In short, the Fabian Society is the HIV/AIDS of political subversion... attack and rot within and decapitate the government´s "immune system."

For anyone intelligent, study Well´s book "An Open Conspiracy"; study the British Fabian Society; study the totalitarian leanings of HG Wells and the relationship of the Fabians to the Theosophists and Satanists.

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1262817/pg1



From an Amazon reviewer:

H.G Wells was a propagandist and social engineer that worked for the world elites. How much of his work was from his own mind and how much he was told directly to write is debatable. Its common knowledge Wells was more or less a basketcase that could be easily controlled, so that, along with his talent for writing made him the perfect man for the job. He was an open Fabian Socialist which wants a centralized world government but they consider themselves to be kinder and gentler enlightened types as opposed to the Fascists and Communists. The difference could be likened to giving a dog thats tied in the yard with four feet of rope, instead of the two feet of rope that the Commies and Fascists give you.

The Open Conspiracy calls for various things that either have been implemented since like a centralized world bank controlling all money creation, which all "world citizens" (at this point in time unwittingly) would pay a tax into. He also calls for eliminating property ownership, replacing individual land owners with "householders" or "tenants." Wells being the generous enlightened type that he is does think that to a degree the "householder" should be allowed to "fashion his house and garden after his own desire." Oh how kind of you Mr. Wells!!!

Other choice things discussed in The Open Conspiracy, and these are direct quotes, are Wells talking about the need for a "mental sanitation process" where feelings of nationalism are to be replaced with an acceptance being a "world citizen". Wells says the main objective of the "Open Conspiracy" in the early stages of the social engineering process is to "disentangle all traditions, loyalties, and time honored ideas", meaning loyalty to ones country, race and family. He also calls for education reform to have education that pushes "the cause of world reconstruction" as well as publishing books that push this idea and making sure all libraries are stocked with them. He also says the Open Conspiracy must "impose freedom". Any of this sound familiar to you?

In some ways this book is similar to the Protocols, very boring to read, but amazing for the blatant example of the world controllers openly flaunting what they had planned to do and have done or are in the process of doing. Like I said boring but you should probably read this if you want to decipher the globalist beast.

http://www.amazon.com/Open-Conspira...=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1323734379&sr=1-2

 

[Endgame]

My question is how accurate, true if you will, is any of this?

I am highly suspicious of the wisdom of all this genetic monkeying about, but I am also cautious of precipitous reactions against it. I am not convinced that all genetic manipulation is of necessity bad. I do, however, feel we could be moving forward far too rapidly, especially when materials from one species is spliced into that of another. I mean, crossing a human with a pig? I suppose the propriety depends largely on the nature of the crossing.

Even so, this area of endeavor appears to be perhaps a penultimate candidate for unintended consequences. I have seen nothing that even vaguely leads me to believe that the knowledge these so-called "genetic engineers" hold represents do much as the smallest epsilon of what may be required to play safely in this way. Indeed, terming then "engineer" seems to me to an indication of the hubris driven egos in question, which I suspect is an eminently dangerous way to proceed. IMO this area of endeavor needs to be undertaken with the utmost caution and at a slow pace to allow any unforeseen consequences to become apparent. Even then this strikes me as very risky business, but going at what appears to be breakneck speed is almost certainly unsound in the wildest way imaginable.

If we know nothing else about biological systems, it is that we know not enough about them and that they continually manage to surprise us. How about the tube worms that live in some 20K feet of water by volcanic vent in 700*F water that is full of compounds that would kill a human being in no time flat? Such life was so very confidently deemed "impossible" by the infallibly learned "scientists" who then had to wash a lot of egg from their arrogant faces and eat great steaming piles of crow. What makes any intelligent and circumspect man think that one can go here and assume no trespass?

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aqtest.html

Take quiz. Post results.