Gary Johnson Announcement?

thasre

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
559
Does anyone know if this is true?

from race42008.com
I have learned that former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson will be making an announcement in three weeks.

I have been unable to verify details, but speculation is mounting that the former Governor is preparing to re-enter the public policy debate.

Over the last sixth months, there have been rumors that Governor Johnson has been considering launching a campaign for the Republican nomination in 2012, although Johnson has not confirmed this.

I sure hope it's true! But I hope the announcement is NOT that he's running in 2012. That would be premature. But for Johnson to begin stepping into the public policy debate now would be a very good thing if he does ultimately decide to run for President. (As I hope he does, in time.)
 
Yeah its very premature to announce his run for president. He is definately not running for Senate in NM.

Its probably an endorsement.
 
Last edited:
I can't support him for president due to how he treated his (now deceased) wife. See http://bit.ly/vfOyT (PDF) linked from note #13 at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gary_E._Johnson&oldid=313295888

If a man can't show commitment in his marriage, what makes us think he'll be able to show true commitment to the Constitution?

Ugh...

Johnson just keeps on looking like a weak candidate with extremely little hope of winning the Republican nomination... and yet sadly he is our best hope.:(:confused:

I will support him, but I am NOT happy at all about him being pro-choice, even if his position is the same as Paul's, I still don't like him being pro-choice, and I don't like the idea of a leader being a person that can't remain commited to their spouse either.

I always think if Gene Simmons can do it, ANYONE can do it.

We should all pray or do whatever it is you like to do to try to make things happen that Ron Paul will run again, because even at his old age I think he will be a much stronger candidate than Johnson.

We're just not in a good situation for a candidate to run. Ron's old, and Sanford and Johnson can't stay away from other women.:mad::( And Johnson is pro-choice:(, and Sanford is not a sure thing anyway, he could be just another typical politician.:(
 
Gary will start making the talk show / PR rounds here soon to lay the ground work for a Presidential run. If we can get him double the % that Ron got in NH, and have him come in 3rd in Iowa, then he might have a shot.



But I can't reveal my source, let's just say it's someone who is prominent, educated, and "in-the-know". ;)
 
Gary will start making the talk show / PR rounds here soon to lay the ground work for a Presidential run. If we can get him double the % that Ron got in NH, and have him come in 3rd in Iowa, then he might have a shot.



But I can't reveal my source, let's just say it's someone who is prominent, educated, and "in-the-know". ;)

We will need a lot more than double the % Ron Paul got in New Hampshire to win.

I think its time people here really dig in mentally, and prepare for the challenges ahead of us in elections because you can't go from 5%-10% to victory in normal elections.

You could go from the top three, maybe top five in unusual situations, and win, but not from near last. So if Johnson does decide to run, we're going to need him going into New Hampshire looking to very realisticly claim total and complete victory over the enemy. That way the worst that can happen is third.;)

I do hope still that Ron runs though because Johnson just isn't Ron Paul.
 
I can't support him for president due to how he treated his (now deceased) wife. See http://bit.ly/vfOyT (PDF) linked from note #13 at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gary_E._Johnson&oldid=313295888

If a man can't show commitment in his marriage, what makes us think he'll be able to show true commitment to the Constitution?

I didn't read what he did, but a constitution doesn't bitch at you for pointless reasons. It's a bit easier to commit to long term.
 
Does Gary still support internet taxation and open borders?

You're already supposed to pay sales tax on your web transactions out of state. Johnson joined 43 other governors calling for authorization to streamline and simplify the existing sales tax system. He also was beat up for trying to pass child porn laws on the Internet that mirrored existing New Mexico law.

As for open borders...do you mean like how the Libertarian Party platform that says "Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders." Or are you referring to his adopting the National Governors Association policy:

The Governors urge Congress to consider the following principles regarding immigration policies.
-The decision to admit immigrants is a federal one that carries with it a firm federal commitment to shape immigration policy within the parameters of available resources we as a nation are determined to provide.
-The fiscal impact of immigration decisions must be addressed by the federal government. The states, charged with implementing federal policy, have shared and are sharing in the costs; however, there should be no further shift of costs to the states.
-A basic responsibility of the federal government is to collect and disseminate timely and reliable statistical information on immigration and its consequences for the United States.
-Federal immigration policies should ensure that new immigrants do not become a public charge to federal, state, or local governments.
-The federal government must provide adequate information to and consult with states on issues concerning immigration decisions that affect the states.
-States should not have to incur significant costs in implementing federal laws regarding immigration status as a condition of benefits.


-The Governors urge the following regarding Legalization and Naturalization:
States require maximum flexibility in determining and allocating resources to meet the needs of newly legalized aliens.
-The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) must be diligent in its efforts to ensure that felons are not naturalized and being given the benefits of citizenship rather than being deported.
-The naturalization process should be streamlined to be more efficient and accessible to eligible applicants wishing to become citizens, with all the rights and responsibilities thereof.
-The INS must take aggressive action to eliminate the backlog of naturalization applications, which is now approximately 800,000 nationwide.
 
Last edited:
I will be happy with a Johnson/Paul ticket

Ron just doesnt have the energy or time to spend weeks on end travelling around IOWA/NH, Gary has energy in abundance. Ron Paul has layed the groundwork and built up an army of grassroots.

I would like to see Ron run but drop out and endorse Johnson before the first primary. That way the liberty ticket gets double the time to win over people in the debates.;)
 
Last edited:
You have got to be kidding me with these personal attacks. Please tell me that any of you know something more than a wiki article. What a thing to do, attack a man and his marriage situation when you have no idea what was going on.

People will cry and whine about issues they did not give two hoots about until they became Ron Paul supporters.

I disagree with him on issues, but realize on some BIG ones he is going to stick his neck on the line and fight for them.

Go ahead a name me another Republican Gov who did not endorse GWBush in 2004 or John McCain in 2008. Give me another former Gov who spoke at Rally for the Republic.

Gary Johnson is his own man, we will have to get to know him fully before writting him off because of a divorce.

I for one can't wait to see what is up and from what I already know about the guy would support him 100% if he runs. (unless Ron Paul also runs) Then both get 50/50 support.
 
I'd rather have someone who is both a constitutionalist and a man of proven good character.


Good luck.


You might just have to compromise if you want to fix this country.


And from what i've read the marriage was already falling apart and moving towards divorce. . .
 
Can't vote for him because he didn't stop having sex once his wife died? What do that have to do with being a president and maybe, just maybe giving us back some freedoms?

Pretty sure Thomas J banged a couple women in his time....i guess I can't follow his lead.
 
I have a few problems with Gary Johnson myself, but I still think he's our most viable candidate. And I'm a firm believer in throwing my support behind the best candidate who's actually running... not exactly a "lesser of two evils" sort of thing, but a "least evil among many" sort of thing. (It's why I voted for Bob Barr even though I thought he was a supremely mediocre candidate.)

The way I see it is, our choices in 2012 on the Republican side are going to be something like:
Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin, Tim Pawlenty, Haley Barbour, Bobby Jindal, New Gingrich, Gary Johnson.

Of those, Gary Johnson is the CLEAR frontrunner in terms of being a real reformer, with mostly flawless policy positions and an even better political record, and is arguably even the most qualified / experienced with eight years of having been a governor with almost no major problems resulting from his policies (contrasted with the dismal records of Romney and Huckabee).

The way I see it is, the candidates rank something like this:
Gary Johnson > Sarah Palin > Bobby Jindal > Newt Gingrich > Mitt Romney > Haley Barbour > Tim Pawlenty > Mike Huckabee.

When Sarah Palin is shaping up to be the next best thing to a Ron Paul candidate, Gary Johnson doesn't look half-bad.
 
Pretty sure Thomas J banged a couple women in his time....i guess I can't follow his lead.

I have to say, although I agree with your overall sentiment in your comment, I think Jefferson gets a really bad rap about his women habits. It seems that he was very faithful to his first wife, with whom he had six children before she died from complications of childbirth. And apparently he promised her he'd never remarry (which he technically didn't) but since it's hard to expect a widower to remain celibate, he took another "wife", his first wife's half-sister, whom he couldn't marry because she was a quarter black.

Some people like to make it sound like "Oh, that wicked Jefferson raped one of his slave women" but they had six children together and he took her with him as a "secretary" when he went on vacations to France and such. He freed from slavery those of his children with her that he could (the law prevented him from freeing slaves who couldn't support themselves). His daughters married white men and entered into white society; his freed sons married mixed-race women but had a privileged position in the black community. One later went West where he and his family passed for white, and only one son even continued to self-identify as black. One of the descendants of this latter son went on to become the first elected black public official in the State of California.

All in all, he seems to have had two consecutive, monogamous, stable relationships and did the best by them he could under the circumstances. His relationship with Sally Hemings was semi-public even during his own lifetime and was kind of an open-secret long afterwards. His family was well-provided for. I just don't think people give Jefferson the credit he deserves in how he handled his love life.

Wow, okay, so all that is totally irrelevant to this thread, but I just had to share it...
 
Back
Top