FRUSTRATION-To be shunned by the MSM while honestly running a campaign.

When asked which candidates drew the most young people on CNN, the reporter said he'd been to 5 candidates rallies and that it was definitely "Barak Obama". Good way of not mentioning Ron Paul while also not lying.
 
Sheesh, this is aggravating, no wonder everyone gets pissed...just listening to these news channels and how they never ever ever ever ever mention Ron Paul...is disgusting, a preposterous tactic.:mad::mad::mad::mad:
 
im sooo pissed... and when I call out soft fascism, they call me childish.. wtf is THAT if not suppression of opposition through censorship!!!!!!!!!!!!!! bloody sheeps. :(((
 
It truely does, my father told me that I was actually getting too emotionally involved and to keep a level head, and I said, sure, but how can one do that when once can clearly see what is going in front of their face while millions of others don't want to see it....sigh...DENIAL is not only a river in Egypt.:mad:
 
Earlier today on Fox news they finally showed Ron Paul, but the newscaster called him "Ron Paully". Way to screw up the little bit of coverage we get.
 
Yeah but look at the bright side we will have so much more supporters when a draft is instituted right after a economic collapse. I guess then the mob will come to their senses.
 
Oh btw I will not fight for this country or should I say for this corrupt evil government. I guess I'll enjoy the solitude of the country life.
 
If you don't win anything or don't move up in the polls enough to make a difference, then you can expect little to no coverage. This is nothing new.
 
im sooo pissed... and when I call out soft fascism, they call me childish.. wtf is THAT if not suppression of opposition through censorship!!!!!!!!!!!!!! bloody sheeps. :(((

Ironically, what the powers that be are doing IS childish. It's like a group of bullies repeatedly stealing from the other kids in class one-by-one, so those kids never want to challenge the bullies alone. If one of those kids stands up and calls the bullies out on the injustice of their actions, the bullies (and even some of the kids, wanting to gain favor with the bullies) will decry that kid as a crybaby, poor sport, tattle-tale, you name it, yet we know who's really acting immature and who's doing something commendable.

It truely does, my father told me that I was actually getting too emotionally involved and to keep a level head, and I said, sure, but how can one do that when once can clearly see what is going in front of their face while millions of others don't want to see it....sigh...DENIAL is not only a river in Egypt.:mad:

Right, and Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, etc. were all too emotionally involved in revolting against the British for imposing relatively light (by modern standards) excise taxes on them. :rolleyes: Why are we supposed to put up with the blatant authoritarianism, corporatism, and imperialism in this country when people have revolted over far less in human history?

If you don't win anything or don't move up in the polls enough to make a difference, then you can expect little to no coverage. This is nothing new.

And yet one can never hope to rise in the polls without adequate media coverage, and one can never hope to do well at the ballot box if the polls tell people "he can't win." I love it.
 
Same

It truely does, my father told me that I was actually getting too emotionally involved and to keep a level head, and I said, sure, but how can one do that when once can clearly see what is going in front of their face while millions of others don't want to see it....sigh...DENIAL is not only a river in Egypt.:mad:

My mother said the same thing to me that I'm getting to emotionally involved with this Ron Paul movement. I keep telling her that his message is going to define our generation not entering into senseless wars all the time.

Every time I watch CNN with my mother and I don't see a mention of Ron Paul I just get pissed. I love it when Ron Paul is always the first one to mention a keep problem (I.E. No more IRS or Borrowing from China) the MSM just say, "Oh that Huckabee was the first to think of that no more IRS thing" or "Gee Romney is dead on about that China thing."

We all should start our own network. Donate as much money to man like Ron Paul and have our own channel!
 
As far as I am concerned the troops would be better off protecting our freedoms here at home where it seems they are being challenged the most. I don't live in Iraq or Afghanistan...

It's just sad. The funny part is no one will still understand why the economy is being flushed down the toilet, why we lose allies, why we are resented in most countries in the world....:mad:
 
My mother said the same thing to me that I'm getting to emotionally involved with this Ron Paul movement. I keep telling her that his message is going to define our generation not entering into senseless wars all the time.

Every time I watch CNN with my mother and I don't see a mention of Ron Paul I just get pissed. I love it when Ron Paul is always the first one to mention a keep problem (I.E. No more IRS or Borrowing from China) the MSM just say, "Oh that Huckabee was the first to think of that no more IRS thing" or "Gee Romney is dead on about that China thing."

We all should start our own network. Donate as much money to man like Ron Paul and have our own channel!

Haha, it sounds like we have the same problem you and I...YES I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY, I for one would love to participate in such an endeavour, "The Liberty Network"..."The Founding Fathers News Network (FFNN)"..."CTV (Constitution TV)"..."The Freedom Network (TFN)"...:o
 
If you don't win anything or don't move up in the polls enough to make a difference, then you can expect little to no coverage. This is nothing new.

Chicken/egg.

There's ZERO excuse to exclude him, like at the front page of CNN.com at one point today, and other sites, newspapers, TV considering there's only 4 GOP to cover.
 
Last edited:
Here is the ABC "coverage plan" for Super Tuesday from their website:
http://abcnewsradio.com/08election/advisories/supertuesday.html


Notice their coverage plan doesn't include Ron Paul but does include the others.



Let them know what you think:

http://abcnewsradio.com/contact.html



NEW YORK NEWSROOM:
(212) 456-5100
[email protected]


Newsroom Fax Machine :D
212.456.5150


Cristi Landes
Manager, Programming
212.456.5107
[email protected]


Wayne Fisk
Director, Programming
212.456.5327
[email protected]


Jeff Fitzgerald
Executive Director, Operations
212.456.5554
[email protected]


Heidi Oringer
Executive Director, Entertainment
212.456.5541
[email protected]


Jon Newman
News Coverage
212.456.5100
[email protected]


Joyce Alcantara
Assignment Manager
212.456.5106
[email protected]


Jim Kane
Deputy D.C. Bureau Chief
202.222. 6604
[email protected]


Andrew Kalb
Executive Director, Programming
305.567.2269
[email protected]


Robert Garcia
Executive Director, News & Sports
212.456.5103
[email protected]


Peter Salinger (THE MAN IN CHARGE OF ELECTION COVERAGE)
Director, Special Events & Sports
212.456.5105
[email protected]


Steve Jones
Vice President ABC NEWS
212-456-5101
[email protected]
 
If you don't win anything or don't move up in the polls enough to make a difference, then you can expect little to no coverage. This is nothing new.


:rolleyes:

You can't move up in the polls without media coverage, so that's a BS argument. The media will not report on a candidate they don't want to win.

Giuliani didn't win shit and was reported on the news constantly as a front-runner.

Take your blinders off.

This documentary covers the same crap going on in the media in back in the 90's
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7344181953466797353&hl=en
 
Giuliani still had a respectable % in the national polls and Florida. His strategy was to win in Florida. I wish they would cover Ron Paul more, but if you don't win or aren't competitive in the polls, they'll forget all about you. Paul has little chance to win anywhere or even make a big impact so they've decided to just cover the 3 who will win something today.
 
Giuliani still had a respectable % in the national polls and Florida. His strategy was to win in Florida. I wish they would cover Ron Paul more, but if you don't win or aren't competitive in the polls, they'll forget all about you. Paul has little chance to win anywhere or even make a big impact so they've decided to just cover the 3 who will win something today.

And why did he have high poll numbers?

Answer: THe mainstream media CONSTANTLY talked about him.

Again, bullshit argument. You can't get higher poll numbers if no one knows who the hell you are.

What did Giuliani win? Nothing.

If you watch the video I linked to you'll see they did this in the 90's with a Democratic Presidential candidate who had good poll numbers

Take your blinders off and watch the video.
 
Back
Top