I love this: Fox News spends most of their time with Ron asking things like "How much do you suck as a candidate?" and "Why are many of your supporters nuts?"
Go figure he seems like a wackjob. It's word asscoiation. You set him up as that to people who don't know his positions, what should they think? Especially if they already think he's a "longshot at best..." Bullcrap.
I think if someone is looking at this objectively they would say Paul more than deserved to be there and it was between him and Thompson who won.
McCain would be the loser in my opinion, too many one-liners that fell flat, plus getting outright punked by Paul on the trading with Al Quaeda thing.
Romney should also be considered a loser, I really didn't hear anything that seperates him, though he didn't fall on his ass like McLame did. Giuiliani and Huckabee didn't hurt or help themselves in my opinion.
I would vote for a Paul/Thompson ticket. Ron has the brains, a Thompson has the handshakes and smiles thing down. It's too bad they are a combined age of 140.
And before you jump all over me, I am a huge Ron Paul supporter. I really felt like he nailed the questions he got, it just figures that Fox asks him anything but a "fair and balanced" question.