Whether it is the campaign or merely Rand supporters, the crybaby argument could be made against either group. Ron Paul got smeared with the behavior of his supporters and vice versa.
Is the crybaby argument valid? I don't think so. What happened when Rand stood up to Evans, Guthrie, and Kelly for their unfair treatment? He got big support for defying the biased media. Same thing happened with Newt Gingrich in 2012. Republican voters can see the bias, even inside of Fox News.
What does "defeat the Washington machine" even mean when you play by their rules, and curl up into a ball when they pull their same old dirty tactics? You can't defeat the machine if you acquiesce to its propaganda arm.
I've been very disappointed in FoxNews. They claim to be fair and balanced, but they can't even bother to be accurate or responsible. What a shame. They had a wonderful opportunity to be a leading news organization.
Logic is essential to conservative politics. That's why sophomoric arguments that have bases in appeals to emotion are doomed to fail.This isn't logic, it's politics. There is nothing logical about politics. We raised cain about the blackouts in 2008 and 2012 and nobody ever accuse RP of being a crybaby over that. Any candidate or their organizations complain about unfair coverage, and they get slammed with it. It's just history and human nature.
Logic is essential to conservative politics. That's why sophomoric arguments that have bases in appeals to emotion are doomed to fail.
Demanding a fair playing field is not being a crybaby. To use a timely analogy, the Indianapolis Colts are not crybabies because they complained about rules violations by the New England Patriots. Nobody likes a cheater, and that's what Fox News is doing. Republican voters are all too familiar with media bias, and won't like being faced with blatant hypocrisy by those on their side. Tricks by the GOP establishment to get a RINO in office are being observed by Republican voters, and they're making them mad. Pointing out another one only helps our cause.
That being said, a direct complaint in the public square isn't the only move that can be made. That photo of the FNC poll could be sent to Media Matters, Mediaite, and every other liberal source that loves to bash Fox.
Once again I am utterly shocked and appalled by the performance of Jeb Bush. What is wrong with people in this country? Are they all insane??? I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone where nothing makes sense anymore.
I'm clinging to hope that this was a rigged poll designed to change public opinion rather than measure it. I wonder what the price of a favorable poll is these days?
It's through years of brainwashing from the establishment media. Look at how the media conducts interviews of Jeb Bush, they set him in a room with soft colors, an American flag, etc. it all looks very presidential. Jeb is the man they want, just like Romney, and the fact that the people really don't want him doesn't matter. The people can be led to wherever the establishment wants. People vote for candidates that they think can win and "look presidential." The media is doing everything they can to make Jeb appear presidential and look like a winner. Jeb will keep the Wall St. cash machine humming and war machine enriched so they are backing him and dragging the people along for the ride.Once again I am utterly shocked and appalled by the performance of Jeb Bush. What is wrong with people in this country? Are they all insane??? I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone where nothing makes sense anymore.
I'm clinging to hope that this was a rigged poll designed to change public opinion rather than measure it. I wonder what the price of a favorable poll is these days?
It's on page 20. They polled just about every other Republican verses Clinton, including candidates who aren't polling high at all such as Fiorina and John Kasich. This is outrageous but to be expected. Rand did the best against Hillary in their poll last time, so they had to exclude him this time. We're just going to have to expect more of this throughout the entire campaign.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int...e-ethical-than-most-clintons-favorable-slips/
I take it that Paul is doing really really well and so well in fact that they hide his name. If Paul was doing poorly they would have posted it because it would make their case that much stronger.