Fox News excludes Rand in head to head polling against Hillary Clinton

[Brett85]

It's on page 20. They polled just about every other Republican verses Clinton, including candidates who aren't polling high at all such as Fiorina and John Kasich. This is outrageous but to be expected. Rand did the best against Hillary in their poll last time, so they had to exclude him this time. We're just going to have to expect more of this throughout the entire campaign.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int...e-ethical-than-most-clintons-favorable-slips/

 

[14lbenson]

what a joke. CNN covers Rand the best.

 

[adelina]

I have a slightly different take on this. I actually think "Rand vs Hillary" was polled. But the question + results were deliberately excluded from the published report because it was too favorable to Rand. I think that had the results shown Rand was losing ground to Hillary, Fox would have included it in their published report.

 

[alucard13mm]

And some here still see rand as the bad guy... if he was the bad guy, media would portray him favorably.

 

[14lbenson]

He will be on the Kelly File in a couple minutes...

 

[GunnyFreedom]

of course they did.

 

[FSP-Rebel]

OP posted this better than I did in the other spin area, I just was so pissed when I saw the segments on Baier's special report and then looked into it further.

The whole point here was to show Rand at 7% and not have any evidence showing him so high against Hillary. Mission accomplished.

 

[georgiaboy]

He mentioned his polling best v Hillary when he was on with Wolf. Different poll, but still it's good he's doing this.

Keep pushing this, Rand! Fox's omission of you is BS!!!

 

[hells_unicorn]

Yes, they do that, they ALWAYS do that!

 

[FreedomProsperityPeace]

Well, why doesn't his campaign get on them and expose the bias?

 

[CPUd]

Well, why doesn't his campaign get on them and expose the bias?

Because it would make them look like crybabies and come out of it even worse.

 

[FreedomProsperityPeace]

Because it would make them look like crybabies and come out of it even worse.

So we're crybabies, too, I guess. Pointing out facts invites infantile insults in today's political world.

 

[Brett85]

I just sent an email to Fox News expressing my displeasure. I would encourage everyone here to do the same. Fox's email address is [email protected].

 

[CPUd]

So we're crybabies, too, I guess. Pointing out facts invites infantile insults in today's political world.

Yes, this is the nature of politics.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Yes, this is the nature of politics.

unfortunately it is. The people that get elected usually have the maturity of a 2 year old, and most of their supporters...well, the ones who would pass a Turing test....might have the mentality of an 8 year old.

 

[twomp]

And some here still see rand as the bad guy... if he was the bad guy, media would portray him favorably.

There are some shows on MSNBC that portray Rand pretty favorably. What is your expert media analysis on that?

 

[devil21]

Don't mind me, I'm just over here warming up the snowball machine...

 

[Mach]

There are some shows on MSNBC that portray Rand pretty favorably. What is your expert media analysis on that?

I read something a few months ago about MSNBCs ratings and cancelling of shows and rearranging, anyway, they stated straight out that they were going to go to a more.... 'The goal is to move away from left-wing TV.'

 

[Brian4Liberty]

OP posted this better than I did in the other spin area, I just was so pissed when I saw the segments on Baier's special report and then looked into it further.

The whole point here was to show Rand at 7% and not have any evidence showing him so high against Hillary. Mission accomplished.

So it was discussed on Special Neocon Report? No surprise that they would exclude Rand.

 

[presence]

Scared?