Fox News Debate (12/15) OFFICIAL Thread

I think the guy in the audience was pissed that the FED wasn't brought up in the debate. Kind of wished Ron acknowledged that at the end.
 
Ron Paul is right. He speaks truth. He is not the best speaker, but he is up there doing the best he can. He killed it last week, and he is doing alright in this debate. No matter how well or how poorly he performs, we still have work to do..
 
Haven't watched the debate, but if only half the people bitching in this thread donate $100 for the moneybomb we should have our biggest day ever.

+rep Let's see donation receipts from the negative nellies.
 
Guys...we picked up 700 Facebook likes during the debate.

That is a ton of Likes to pick up in the span of 2 hours.

I'm in for $100 tomorrow.
 
Overreactions abound...Dr. Paul came off WAY worse in the earlier debate in which he said he wasn't worried about an Iranian nuke. This is better for us given that Dr. Paul was able to further clarify his position. Could it have gone better? Sure, if he'd have mentioned:

1. Receives more donations from troops than all of my rivals COMBINED.
2. Was a captain in the air force.
3. Republicans were crushed in 2008 because Americans are SICK OF WARS; why are Republicans running on a promise to bomb Iran in2012?
4. We're "the land of the free and the brave", not "the land of the scared and cowering".

But his response as it stands was, at worst, dredging up our most Republican-repellant talking point, and at best, a better explanation of his most controversial stance. If we're going to lose this thing, it won't be over paranoia about Iran.
 
Last edited:
So we did shitty then? The way you guys are talking it sounds like it wasn't good. Whether it was the media's doing or not...the result is the same.
 
NO ONE Brought Up Russia and China alliance with Iran.

No problem taking on IRAN, with Putin escalating his nuclear forces.

i owe you a plus rep, HW.

no one is making this connection. no one.

you **** with Iran, you **** with Russia and China.
 
Overreactions abound...Dr. Paul came off WAY worse in the earlier debate in which he said he wasn't worried about an Iranian nuke. This is better for us given that Dr. Paul was able to further clarify his position. Could it have gone better? Sure, if he'd have mentioned:

1. Receives more donations from troops than all of my rivals COMBINED.
2. Was a captain in the air force.
3. Republicans were crushed in 2008 because Americans are SICK OF WARS; why are Republicans running on a promise to bomb Iran in2012?
4. We're "the land of the free and the brave", not "the land of the scared and cowering".

But his response as it stands was, at worst, dredging up our weakest idea, and at best, a better explanation of his most controversial stance. If we're going to lose this thing, it won't be over paranoia about Iran.
But everyone is saying he did. Perception is reality. He didn't bring it up. It is done.
 
Back
Top