Anybody else think this audience was packed according to Fox's desires?
yep!
Anybody else think this audience was packed according to Fox's desires?
When did we becime so afraid of Iran all of the sudden?
Yeah, as a pessimist we may have just lost Iowa. Goddamnit. I am so depressed right now.I just don't get it. It's not like the Paul campaign doesn't know which foreign policy talking points work and which ones don't. His responses tonight on Iran were horribly weak and are going to cause some (I don't know how much) damage to his campaign. He recovered slightly, but there was way too much rambling and quotes which are perfect ammo for his opponents. Stick to talking about hundreds of bases worldwide. Stick to talking about how we can't afford this foreign policy. Stick to talking about how you get more money from troops than all other candidates combined! Stick to talking about how we stared down the Russians and the Chinese but can't stare down the Iranians? Every word the good doctor utters about 'of course they want one' does a horrible disservice to the non-interventionist position in this debate format. There's no time for complex ideas, use good strong talking points that get strong applause while maintaining your values!
This late in the campaign, there's no excuse for this!![]()
On a lighter note, his non foreign policy answers have been great so far tonight.
I just don't get it. It's not like the Paul campaign doesn't know which foreign policy talking points work and which ones don't. His responses tonight on Iran were horribly weak and are going to cause some (I don't know how much) damage to his campaign. He recovered slightly, but there was way too much rambling and quotes which are perfect ammo for his opponents. Stick to talking about hundreds of bases worldwide. Stick to talking about how we can't afford this foreign policy. Stick to talking about how you get more money from troops than all other candidates combined! Stick to talking about how we stared down the Russians and the Chinese but can't stare down the Iranians? Every word the good doctor utters about 'of course they want one' does a horrible disservice to the non-interventionist position in this debate format. There's no time for complex ideas, use good strong talking points that get strong applause while maintaining your values!
This late in the campaign, there's no excuse for this!![]()
On a lighter note, his non foreign policy answers have been great so far tonight.
I just don't get it. It's not like the Paul campaign doesn't know which foreign policy talking points work and which ones don't. His responses tonight on Iran were horribly weak and are going to cause some (I don't know how much) damage to his campaign. He recovered slightly, but there was way too much rambling and quotes which are perfect ammo for his opponents. Stick to talking about hundreds of bases worldwide. Stick to talking about how we can't afford this foreign policy. Stick to talking about how you get more money from troops than all other candidates combined! Stick to talking about how we stared down the Russians and the Chinese but can't stare down the Iranians? Every word the good doctor utters about 'of course they want one' does a horrible disservice to the non-interventionist position in this debate format. There's no time for complex ideas, use good strong talking points that get strong applause while maintaining your values!
This late in the campaign, there's no excuse for this!![]()
On a lighter note, his non foreign policy answers have been great so far tonight.