Don't count your chickens yet.
He puts an earmark into the bill because, if he doesn't and the bill passes (As it usually does), the money that he didn't earmark is a blank check for the President to use what he wants for. Ron rightfully knows that the Executive branch doesn't have that sort of power, so he has no choice but to earmark out of principle. His point was that we shouldn't have to earmark if everyone followed his lead and voted no on these bills.
Too many threads.
We are crashing the server
I wonder if the OLD DUDES have passed out yet.
I understand his point, I just disagree with it.
If everyone follows his lead and vote no on those bills, doesn't the money go to the Executive Branch then?
Let's be honest, could Ron have given the answer Romney just did on job?
That was solid.
Let's be honest, could Ron have given the answer Romney just did on job?
That was solid.