MRoCkEd
Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2007
- Messages
- 14,389
Fox News' Chris Wallace aims to give Paul and Conway "A Fair Shake" in their debate
- Thread starter MRoCkEd
- Start date
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
Chris Wallace is ......
nevermind.
But I hope Rand is on his toes.
I really don't like this 'free flowing conversation' where the moderator gets to decide when enough 'gotcha' has occured, etc. I don't trust wallace, and KET, which plans to do the same thing, is absolutely on Conway's side. Where did the 'debates' go and turn into evening newstainment shows?
nevermind.
But I hope Rand is on his toes.
I really don't like this 'free flowing conversation' where the moderator gets to decide when enough 'gotcha' has occured, etc. I don't trust wallace, and KET, which plans to do the same thing, is absolutely on Conway's side. Where did the 'debates' go and turn into evening newstainment shows?
Last edited:
KET plans to turn the debate into this:
YouTube - Days of Our Lives Intro
anything to avoid the real issues. They plug in their commercials for their debates that they are going to talk immigration and never do. Don't ask, don't tell should be mentioned on KET debate, as most of the state's residents are anti-gay and would be shocked to know Jack Conway is actively campaigning on repealing the law.
Abortion, health care, future stimulus and bailouts, foreign policy........ etc... abolishing the filibuster? social security reform so many real issues! Not the politics of personal destruction!
Democrat-turned Republicans usually tend to be statist.
I agree, pre-Ron Paul revolution.
MRoCkEd
Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2007
- Messages
- 14,389
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
my suspicion is that he will attempt to challenge Rand on this to try to get Rand to commit to a more warlike posture, as well. Since the GOP knows Rand's position, and he is currently going for Dems and independents, hopefully he knows to stand tight there. He already took the grief for it in the primary.
Not to mention, much of the neocon establishment.
Jack has basically followed Rand on foreign policy since the race started in 2009. Now, if Wallace focuses on Jack W. Conway from 2002, we have some differences in foreign policy to discuss with that Jack.
Jack is more pro-Israel than Rand and he once sent a campaign letter about Rand not being tough enough on Iran.
There's really no evidence to back up that.
Jack has no voting record and is a professional panderer.
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
Yeah, but he'll say ANYTHING. If they want neocon, he'll out neocon Kristol.
Jack described America's relationship with Israel as "an unbreakable bond" in that anti-Iran email.
http://democratsenators.org/o/57/blastContent.jsp?email_blast_KEY=16719
If Rand were to talk like that then I would no longer support him.
Last edited:
You wouldn't be the first to stop supporting Rand over semantics and his opponent's rhetoric. :o
MikeStanart
Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 2,284
Same guy who asked Ron Paul during the debates : "So you're saying you would take your marching orders from Al Qaeda?"
I am sick of politicians who coddle Israel. It is utterly ridiculous to be in an "unbreakable bond" with any foreign country. Any politician who supports such positions is part of the problem.
And don't accuse me of demanding purity, because I am not. I am just sick of politicians who are in lockstep with AIPAC and its talking points.
Similar threads
