Fox lets Glenn Beck show Scariest chart ever?!

[jon_perez]

Why are people here fighting. The message is now out there. You should be happy.

The message and not the messenger is what counts.

 

[Chase]

The message counts very much, but I'll take this as a very pragmatic positive. Think about it... while Ron Paul definitely got the short end of the stick from nearly everyone, we now have a FOX anchor using his 5pm show to warn people about inflation, US government ponzi schemes and central banking,

 

[Anti Federalist]

The message counts very much, but I'll take this as a very pragmatic positive. Think about it... while Ron Paul definitely got the short end of the stick from nearly everyone, we now have a FOX anchor using his 5pm show to warn people about inflation, US government ponzi schemes and central banking,

And somehow I suspect that would not have happened had we just meekly asked: "please sir, might we have some more Ron Paul?"

Raising hell, flooding the polls, and yes, even chucking snowballs at Hannity, made somebody at Fox Noise sit up and realize, "Hey, there's a market here!"

 

[fj45lvr]

The message counts very much, but I'll take this as a very pragmatic positive. Think about it... while Ron Paul definitely got the short end of the stick from nearly everyone, we now have a FOX anchor using his 5pm show to warn people about inflation, US government ponzi schemes and central banking,

It is so ironic how the GOP is NOW gonna get up on their soap boxes and talk about being fiscally conservative....makes you gag. They had their opportunity and they hung themselves regardless if they went along for the ride intentionally or not over the last 8 years of misery...


At least Beck seems poised to call out the Crooks of the FED and get people to consider PLAN C (plan B is being formulated right now...let's hope that somehow the public will throw it in the crapper and we can RESTORE constitutional money instead)

 

[Bossobass]

Maybe if you would have put a little more effort into listening to the likes of Frank Luntz instead of running with the stoned college idiots screaming "F YOU FRANK" you would have realized that his polling was completely honest all along and you would have put more effort into where it it needed to go. He was an asset, a tool you could have used to your advantage, but instead you marginalized, insulted and threatened him because his polling results and conclusions didn't go your way.

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

This about suns it up, folks. Next time you need to know what's good for you, just ask Frank Luntz then use him as a tool to your advantage.

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Republican Presidential primary Debate, August 5, 2007, Des Moines, Iowa.

Frank Luntz to the ABC "Focus Group" (off camera): "Put your hand down, and, to the rest of you, I don't want to hear any more about Ron Paul!!!"

Now, that's what I call focus.

Fuck You, Frank (and Silverlinx2, and the FOX you rode in on).

Bosso

 

[pinkmandy]

Nice story he posted on digg about Ron Paul meeting with neo-nazi's by silverlinkx: http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_meets_regularly_with_white_supremacists_neo_nazis

This freak is a total psychopath of coercion.
He can't get his rocks off if he isn't pushing a government into force against his neighbors.

When it comes time to water that tree... you will be one of those drops.

Did you guys miss this? silverlinkz2 is a not just a troll but someone who personally worked to smear Dr. Paul and the movement.

 

[pinkmandy]

Check out the profile:

silverlinkx2
Banned Troll - http://digg.com/users/silverlinkx2/history/comments/page2

 

[brandon]

Unfortunately, if you look at the threads silverlink has started in the past 3 months it appears as if he really had a genuine conversion to libertarianism. It looks like in the beginning of November the economic crash led him to see the light. He really hasn't posted anything trollish until he came to this thread supporting Fox and Luntz.

Did he really spend 3 months and close to 300 posts adding legitimacy to his username just so he could troll us?

 

[pinkmandy]

Unfortunately, if you look at the threads silverlink has started in the past 3 months it appears as if he really had a genuine conversion to libertarianism. It looks like in the beginning of November the economic crash led him to see the light. He really hasn't posted anything trollish until he came to this thread supporting Fox and Luntz.

Did he really spend 3 months and close to 300 posts adding legitimacy to his username just so he could troll us?

Hard to say. And I guess we do need to forgive those who undermined everything if they have just awakened and are truly on the side of freedom now. It's can be hard to tell the difference, though. I first noticed him after he made this comment on the 'What women want thread' on the health board:

www.nomarriage.com
www.americanwomensuck.com

Most American women are vile creatures, drugged up and with multiple partners, who will cheat on you without hesitation and then blame you for it. Even ugly ones and the ones in the church do it. It's part of the Marxist agenda to undermine the nuclear family and replace household male authority with the authority of the state.

While you suckers continue to be heartbroken and chase STD-laden, feminist bot zombie women, I will probably leave this doomed country for a lady who enjoys being a lady abroad.

Maybe he just has issues?

 

[Anti Federalist]

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

This about suns it up, folks. Next time you need to know what's good for you, just ask Frank Luntz then use him as a tool to your advantage.

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Republican Presidential primary Debate, August 5, 2007, Des Moines, Iowa.

Frank Luntz to the ABC "Focus Group" (off camera): "Put your hand down, and, to the rest of you, I don't want to hear any more about Ron Paul!!!"

Now, that's what I call focus.

Fuck You, Frank (and Silverlinx2, and the FOX you rode in on).

Bosso

Bosso, good to see you again.

 

[Number19]

Doesn't anyone see what happened here. Silverlinkx2 posted some controversial remarks which generated a lot of flaming. But there were some point buried within these remarks, he kept pushing, then around post #75 the thread evolved into some very good discussion. But then at post #106, the thread devolved back to the beginning. But for those 25 or 30 posts, there was some very good stuff. Maybe, or maybe not, this was intentional. I do know that this debate technique is sometimes effective. One thread ( 120 ) made the comment that Silverlinkx2 had been banned. His last post was 102 and it was then this thread devolved.

 

[torchbearer]

Doesn't anyone see what happened here. Silverlinkx2 posted some controversial remarks which generated a lot of flaming. But there were some point buried within these remarks, he kept pushing, then around post #75 the thread evolved into some very good discussion. But then at post #106, the thread devolved back to the beginning. But for those 25 or 30 posts, there was some very good stuff. Maybe, or maybe not, this was intentional. I do know that this debate technique is sometimes effective. One thread ( 120 ) made the comment that Silverlinkx2 had been banned. His last post was 102 and it was then this thread devolved.

He considers people who smoke pot the cause of the dirty world.
Check out his comments on digg.
Someone who lacks an understanding of what freedom means...