Former SEIU Official Reveals Secret Plan To Destroy JP Morgan & Crash The Stock Market

[EndDaFed]

Save capitalism? Are you joking? Even Ron Paul says what we have is soft fascism. Capitalism is not a form of market where the politically connected get exempted from the rules. http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/health/2010-10-07-healthlaw07_ST_N.htm

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

I prefer Max Keiser's public plan to crash JPMorgan (encouraging people to buy physical silver). At least it transfers real power (wealth) to individuals.

LOL... the first thought was... oh it's MAX @ it.

The Federal Reserve protects their own... the banking cabal owns Washington DC/The Globe... SEIU attacking the wrong target.

 

[FrankRep]

Save capitalism? Are you joking? Even Ron Paul says what we have is soft fascism. Capitalism is not a form of market where the politically connected get exempted from the rules. http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/health/2010-10-07-healthlaw07_ST_N.htm

The United States isn't the Soviet Union yet, things can get much much worse.

 

[pcosmar]

You support destroying Capitalism?

Who said anything about destroying Capitalism ?(oh yeah, you did} Crashing corrupt corporatism is not"destroying Capitalism".
It is supporting it. It is these very folks that support and promote Fiat money.

As far as what is coming,,, that was written long before the US came into existence, and has nothing to do with the US stock market.

16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Chase your tail all you wish. You are not going to change the outcome.
A complete collapse of the system in the US would only take us out of the game. I would welcome that.

A world bank is coming regardless.
I will resist

 

[FrankRep]

Who said anything about destroying Capitalism ?(oh yeah, you did} Crashing corrupt corporatism is not"destroying Capitalism".

What will replace the system? Free Market? No, the IMF is ready to take over.

Chase your tail all you wish. You are not going to change the outcome.
A complete collapse of the system in the US would only take us out of the game. I would welcome that.

The United States will get bailed out of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). People will line up to give away their sovereignty for financial security.

A world bank is coming regardless.
I will resist

Crashing the United States economy will force the United States to use a World Bank and you "welcome that."

 

[pcosmar]

What will replace the system?


Crashing the United States economy will force the United States to use a World Bank and you "welcome that."

OR
Crashing the US economy will crash the US as a world power.
The IMF would have little to take over. The rest of the world can have it.
I would love to see this continent, ignored for the most part. Split up into uncontrollable sections.
freedom through obscurity.

 

[specsaregood]

The United States will get bailed out of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). People will line up to give away their sovereignty for financial security.

Frank for those of us less informed, please explain the differences in practice between the IMF being in control of your economy and having the Federal Reserve in control?

 

[FrankRep]

Frank for those of us less informed, please explain the differences in practice between the IMF being in control of your economy and having the Federal Reserve in control?

2010: The Emerging Global Federal Reserve

As powerful as the Federal Reserve is, just imagine how much more powerful a global Fed would be in terms of its ability to control the global economy and an emerging world currency. By Alex Newman​

2010: Waking up to a World Currency

If global financial elites have their way, America will move quickly toward accepting a planetary fiat currency (a currency not backed by a precious commodity like gold) issued by a world central bank. by Alex Newman​

2010: IMF Report Promotes Global Fiat Currency, World Central Bank

An April report from the International Monetary Fund promoting a world central bank and a global fiat currency went totally undetected by the global press for months, but after a blog post earlier this month, it is now in the media spotlight. By Alex Newman​

2010: IMF as the Global Federal Reserve: G20's Agenda Behind the Agenda

A main component of the G20 Summit in Toronto was the continuing push to promote the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the new Financial Stability Board (FSB)as the global regulators and the global Federal Reserve in the new economic order. by William F. Jasper​

2009: Global Fusion: The G20, IMF, and World Government

The goal of the G20 is to transform the IMF into a global Federal Reserve, moving us closer than ever to the creation of a world government under the United Nations. by William F. Jasper​

2009: G20 Advances New World Order, Media Admit

The G-20 Summit advanced more international government control of the global economy in what the world media called a New World Order. By Alex Newman​

2009: The G20 Push to "Supersize" the International Monetary Fund

The 20G push to “supersize” and transform the International Monetary Fund (IMF) into a global Federal Reserve System has been developing in elite political and economic circles for months. By William F. Jasper​

Interesting:

Leader of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is a Socialist
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=253012

 

[specsaregood]

bunch of regurgitation

So I take it you can't give me a simple explanation of what difference it would make?
Just a couple of examples.

 

[pcosmar]

Frank for those of us less informed, please explain the differences in practice between the IMF being in control of your economy and having the Federal Reserve in control?

Nothing but a name change. And it has been planed and in the works for years. Nothing New.

The only way to prevent it is to have nothing to take over.
or.
"The spice must not flow"

He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing
Muad'Dib

 

[FrankRep]

So I take it you can't give me a simple explanation of what difference it would make?
Just a couple of examples.

I gave you several years of research. But whatever...

Right now the United States has control on the Federal Reserve Bank, but we'll have no control of the International Monetary Fund. The United States will lose Monetary Sovereignty.

 

[specsaregood]

Nothing but a name change. And it has been planed and in the works for years. Nothing New.

Surely there must be some huge drastic change for Frank to be so afraid of it that he is willing to keep the current corrupt system in place.

I'm sure Frank will get back to us with a list of how it would be so much worse and clear this up.

 

[specsaregood]

Right now the United States has control on the Federal Reserve Bank, but we'll have no control of the International Monetary Fund. The United States will lose Monetary Sovereignty.

In what way do we have control of the Federal Reserve Bank? Can we audit them? Make decisions for them? Stop them? We can't even appoint whomever we want to be in charge of them, we can only choose from a pre-selected list. In what way do we have control of them or monetary sovereignty?

We can always take control at anytime by following the constitution. We could always reject the IMF and switch to a sound currency. It sounds like a strawman you are setting up. Got anything better?

 

[FrankRep]

Nothing but a name change. And it has been planed and in the works for years. Nothing New.

That may be true. In either case, the Globalists are ready to dump the Federal Reserve and use the IMF, a Global Central Bank.

 

[FrankRep]

In what way do we have control of the Federal Reserve Bank? Can we audit them? Make decisions for them? Stop them? We can't even appoint whomever we want to be in charge of them, we can only choose from a pre-selected list. In what way do we have control of them or monetary sovereignty?

I'll choose the Federal Reserve over the IMF.

 

[specsaregood]

I'll choose the Federal Reserve over the IMF.

But you haven't given a reason. Surely with all those years of research you should be able to do so. Do we or do we not have monetary sovereignty with the federal reserve?

 

[pcosmar]

Right now the United States has control on the Federal Reserve Bank, but we'll have no control of the International Monetary Fund. The United States will lose Monetary Sovereignty.

No it doesn't.
The US has no control over the Federal Reserve, and does not even know the extent of foreign interests involved in it.

We have no "Monetary Sovereignty" to lose. That is the problem and is why Ron Paul has been attempting (unsuccessfully) to audit the Fed.

 

[acptulsa]

But you haven't given a reason. Surely with all those years of research you should be able to do so. Do we or do we not have monetary sovereignty with the federal reserve?

We're screwed if we do and screwed if we don't--unless, of course, we learn to barter (perhaps with silver and gold, which are barterable commodities). There is something to be said for competition among currencies. But so long as we can barter, we'll have that.

The only other difference I can think of is whether or not the cock which is screwing you is American. Considering the international nature of the banks that own the Fed, though, I believe that anyone who thinks we're getting screwed by a strictly American piece of meat is self-deception.

 

[FrankRep]

But you haven't given a reason. Surely with all those years of research you should be able to do so. Do we or do we not have monetary sovereignty with the federal reserve?

Do I really need to explain why having a World Central Bank and a World Government (this is coming) is a bad thing?

 

[specsaregood]

Do I really need to explain why having a World Central Bank and a World Government (this is coming) is a bad thing?

No, I want you to explain what the differences in practice are between having the federal reserve in charge of our monetary policy vs. the IMF.