For those who still aren't convinced that the MSM is used to manipulate the public...

Is this really news to anyone here?

I used to get all my news from the MSM before I got a computer (in 2003), I still listen to what they say, then go online for "the rest of the story".
 
For those not already convinced, it's WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too late. They are lost causes.
 
pcosmar said:
Is this really news to anyone here?

I used to get all my news from the MSM before I got a computer (in 2003), I still listen to what they say, then go online for "the rest of the story".
Click to expand...


It may not be news to a lot of people here, but it sure will be news to a lot of others who still didn't believe until they read these articles that they have been manipulated by the media and the Bush administration.

freelance said:
For those not already convinced, it's WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too late. They are lost causes.
Click to expand...

There's still hope for many of them!
 
The newspaper said in trying to achieve its goal, the administration exploited not only ideological and military allegiances but also a powerful financial dynamic, namely the fact that most of these analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on television.

DURRRRRRRRRRRR
 
This article itself is loaded with propaganda

"Records and interviews show how the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform the analysts into a kind of media Trojan horse — an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks," the newspaper said.
Click to expand...

whoa whoa! Hold up! Terrorism?? The rest of the article has been about our unprovoked invasion of Iraq and now they just manage to drop the terrorism word in out of no where! Nice sly way to say that iraq coverage and terrorism coverage are the same thing.

What terrorism coverage could they possibly be reffering to? 9/11 was the only terrorist action that has happened to us. If they are talking about 9/11, why dont they just specifically say so instead of being vague and saying "terrorism coverage."
 
HighlandMediaworks said:
I am sure that is where a lot of the $$$ went for the war....propaganda
Click to expand...

WIthout a doubt. I'm sure they spent much more on propganda targeting the iraqis that propoganda targeting us. Why are the Iraqis resistant to the same propganda techniques that have 90% of our country brainwashed?
 
The MSM is doing it on their own. The MSM are the biggest lobbyists in Washington. We're depending on a special interest groups to give us our news, this is pathetic lol
 
qh4dotcom said:
I blame more the voters and their stupidity for allowing themselves to be manipulated by the media than the media itself.

Here's why I think that way

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zsr0UpVjoE
Click to expand...

Ain't that the truth! The facts were out there clearly enough so that anybody who actually cared enough about making an informed decision could have been informed, but too many people care more about American Idol than about foreign and domestic policy.
 
This article is a load of krap... the MSM blaming the Pentagon for influencing them.

Bulls**t... the were the ones beating the drum to invade Iraq... right along side of the administration.

It really makes it hard to decide who should be the first against the wall when the revolution comes. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

osan
What Is The Public Trust?
Replies
0
Views
268
osan
osan
PAF
The Danger Is Real: The Deep State’s Plot to Destabilize the Nation Is Working
Replies
0
Views
781
PAF
PAF
Brian4Liberty
Audit USAID…Then Shut it Down!
Replies
9
Views
2K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Swordsmyth
Trump To Sign Order Making English The Official Language Of US
Replies
2
Views
141
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
PAF
Slash Military Spending: “Defense” Budgets are Bigger than Ever Before
Replies
1
Views
972
PAF
PAF
Back
Top