FL-Student beats the dogshit out of female teacher. Local activist: "not his fault"

Scott Adams is taking heat for his comments the other day, but he's right: this is not fixable.

I think where Adams went off the rails was when he equated "some" black people with "all" black people. At first, I thought he was referring to separating himself with the 47% of the poll that couldn't say it was ok to be white, but it soon became clear that he was talking about separating from black people in general. It's an easy slip of logic, but a dangerous one.

When I look at this video, I don't automatically focus on the racial aspects. Just like I didn't when I watched the George Floyd incident. I do see cultural impacts, though. And I think sometimes people equate the cultural issues with racial issues. These things are not mutually exclusive.

As for the "diversity" comment, I think Thomas Sowell put it best: "America’s great good fortune has been that Americans have been able to unite as Americans against every enemy. It has not been our diversity, but our ability to overcome the problems inherent in diversity, and to act together as Americans, that has been our strength." And that's what gets lost when we try to divide by race.
 
As for the "diversity" comment, I think Thomas Sowell put it best: "America’s great good fortune has been that Americans have been able to unite as Americans against every enemy. It has not been our diversity, but our ability to overcome the problems inherent in diversity, and to act together as Americans, that has been our strength."

And that is what is lost, and does not exist anymore.

Between million and millions of foreign invaders, and the domestic population taught to thoroughly disregard or loathe or utterly disagree what it even means to be an American, there is no unity in "The Idea of America" anymore.

The Marxists have been wildly successful in convincing at least two generations of legacy Americans that there is nothing of value and nothing worth defending, let alone uniting around, a construct based on slavery, imperialism, native genocide and white supremacy.

So that leaves nothing to do but to separate along ethnic, political and religious lines.

Forcing groups of people together that inherently distrust and and dislike each other is a recipe for genocide.

That's why our oppressors love the idea of compact mega cities, because the only way you can get Balkanized, atomized Man to get along under those conditions is with a heavy handed police state.
 
Last edited:
So that leaves nothing to do but to separate along ethnic, political and religious lines.

Forcing groups of people together that inherently distrust and and dislike each other is a recipe for genocide.

I fixed that for you. At least from my perspective. I'm all for ideological separation, but you'll never get me to think that ideologies are dictated by someone's ethnicity or religion. Sure, there are cultural influences that can incline a larger portion of ethnic or religious groups to certain ideologies, but it's not universal.

People are individuals. And there are plenty of people who share my ethnic background and religion that do not share my ideology at all. I'd much rather separate from those people!
 
People are individuals.

Yes they are, and they are also "social" beings that organize themselves into societies based on, usually, ethnic, political and religious similarities.

That was the sheer brilliance and revolutionary concept of the United States as laid out by the Founders.

The rights of the individual were sacrosanct and protected, government was shackled by a Bill of Rights that prohibited incursions and violations, while at the same time people were free to organize into communities and enclaves of "their own kind" as they saw fit.

And for two hundred or so years, it worked, maybe not perfectly, but with scuffles and brawls and upsets we carried on, to become one of the most prosperous nations to have ever existed. And that happened because there was a universal agreement that the ideals of America would be the glue that held us together.

The first wave of Marxist revolution, post WWii and into the 1960s, started the undermining process of that arrangement. By questioning and revising history, taking total control of "education", rewriting immigration policy and substituting class with race, they began the process of dismantling the American Paideia.

Fast forward through my lifetime as I watched all this unfold around me, to where we are today, the concept of government existing only to protect the rights of the individual is as dead as Jacob Marley.

Daily broadcasts from Radio Rwanda mark me as the enemy of all that is good. I, as I noted before, am a marked man in the nation my forefathers built. I have become the Kulak, the Jew, the Old, the Tutsi.

All because the Marxists have been successful is altering history, so that concept of individual liberty, and the who conceived the idea in a political form, is longer divinely inspired brilliance, but just obsolete ramblings of old racist dead white slave owners, to be disregarded.

Just a few minutes ago, I posted a story that confirmed the Treasury Dept. was working on implementing race based IRS enforcement actions, to increase audits and tax enforcement on whites and Asians, specifically.

All that said, by all means, separate by ideological boundaries if need be.

But Separate.
 
What, exactly, was this kid's mental malfunction, I'd like to know. He seemed both lucid and defiant at his arrest. Perhaps this attack was a first.

I don't know. I'm not a trained psychologist. I do have relatives with mental health issues that for the most part seem 100% functional. But does it even matter? He had already been identified as having mental health issues. Let's say he was "faking it" and was just "bad." What would have been the harm of taking him seriously, and putting him in a learning environment where it would have been difficult for him to harm himself or others? I'm not saying what that environment should be. It just shouldn't be one where he was left alone with a female have his size that was unable to physically restrain him if necessary. I'm not sure what you don't understand about what I'm saying.

If that's the case, then of course, there would be no reason he would have been "locked down" in the first place. To do so preemptively, or to treat him differently in any way, especially against a young black man, would certainly be considered a "hate crime".

Wrong. If he had been identified as special needs with aggression he could have been put in a facility. And as a personal observation I think you overindulge yourself on a diet of reverse racism stories that you have forgotten that traditional racism still exists. The Buffalo shooter has just been sentenced to life in prison. It would do you well to read his story. As for the risk of over criminalizing kids, there is the recent story of the second judge to be sentenced in the "kids for cash" scheme where they got kickbacks for putting children in juvenile detention for no reason whatsoever. One of these kids was put in detention for the "crime" of mocking his principal or MySpace. (Tells how long ago that was. The wheels of just-us certainly turn slowly when judges are the defendants.)

That's why "race" is brought into it, because it very well may be a first time attack, where the constant drumbeat Radio Rwanda in his ear was enough to finally make him snap and lash out when being disciplined by a white woman.

No. Race is brought into it because you're in a negative feedback cycle where unrelated stories feed on themselves. I gave you a counter example of a white mental health patient acting exactly the same way. I have a relative in Oregon which is OVERWHELMING WHITE who works in a mental health hospital for the criminally insane. It's literally like Arkham Asylum in the Batman mythos. Nurses get physically assaulted constantly. One of the patients actually turned himself in because he had consumed so much media news about active shooters that he wanted to be one. He bought the AR, stockpiled the ammo, had the newspaper clippings, but thankfully in a moment of sanity realized he should turn himself in. He was white of course. (Oregon).

https://www.yahoo.com/news/oregon-high-school-janitor-stockpiled-213032145.html

fd1c68367a3c2ae25e88e62b6652301b


If he was black I'm sure you'd find someway to connect this to "Radio Rwanda." But he's white. So.....oh yeah he's got to be crazy. And he was a high school janitor! He clearly appeared lucid and functional enough to get a position of trust with young people. (Janitor's have keys to everything). And he had enough sense to turn himself in before the shooting! Mental health doesn't work the way you apparently think it does.

Nothing in the OP story suggest this miscreant was motivated by anything but a desire to have his Nintendo Switch back. Nothing. You saw a racial angle where non exists. There was a story earlier this year of a 10 year old child who stole the keys to his mom's gun safe, took the gun and shot and killed her all because he wanted an Oculus Rift. Are you going to run that through your filter and come up with a race angle on that story too? Hint. They were the same race. Now a good example of a racially motivated crime (hate crime) is the WHITE kid in Buffalo New York that live streamed a mass shooting where he ADMITTEDLY targeted black people. I wonder if what his negative feedback loop was?

And to me, that's not hyperbole: there is not a day that goes by that someone of influence or political power, from the President of the United States on down, is not calling me, and the virtues I hold sacred, a poisonous threat to the republic, an existential danger that must be stamped out and eradicated. I am now a marked man, in the nation my forefathers built for me.

An equally poisonous threat is white people assuming that every crime when it's black versus white is racially motivated even when there is no evidence of that as in this case. That doesn't mean it's never the case. And black people do get charged with hate crimes when there's actual evidence of the crime being racially motivated. This is just not one of those instances. But you're acting like a white version of Radio Rwanda.
 
I fixed that for you. At least from my perspective. I'm all for ideological separation, but you'll never get me to think that ideologies are dictated by someone's ethnicity or religion. Sure, there are cultural influences that can incline a larger portion of ethnic or religious groups to certain ideologies, but it's not universal.

People are individuals. And there are plenty of people who share my ethnic background and religion that do not share my ideology at all. I'd much rather separate from those people!

There's no evidence in THIS story of race or political ideology being a motivating factor. None. Zilch. Zero. A black teenager with mental health problems and no self control beat up a white teacher's aid. He absolutely would have done the same thing if the teacher's aid had been black. And politics and ideology didn't factor into this story at all! He's no different than the 10 year old kid that shot and killed his own mother because he wanted an Oculus Rift. Not every story is fodder for racial or political agendas. Sometimes crazy people do crazy things. In the case of the 10 year old there were warnings. The boy heard voices and there were "two little girls" that only he saw that would tell him to do bad things. In Bible times they would call that demon possession. Whatever it is, it's something that happens in all races, all ideologies and all politics.
 
I don't know. I'm not a trained psychologist. I do have relatives with mental health issues that for the most part seem 100% functional. But does it even matter? He had already been identified as having mental health issues. Let's say he was "faking it" and was just "bad." What would have been the harm of taking him seriously, and putting him in a learning environment where it would have been difficult for him to harm himself or others? I'm not saying what that environment should be. It just shouldn't be one where he was left alone with a female have his size that was unable to physically restrain him if necessary. I'm not sure what you don't understand about what I'm saying.

I understand perfectly what you are saying. And if he was having mental health issues that manifested as violence, then yes, by all means he should have been isolated.

But we don't know that. All we know is he was a "special needs" student. That could mean he had a reading problem.

Everything else you wrote is an effort to point out that there is no conclusive proof to say that this kid acted with racial animus towards the teacher he beat down.

I'm willing to concede that point, because it's true, I don't know what was in his mind, which is why "hate crimes" are a ridiculous concept.

It is pure speculation on my part that he may have been "radicalized" into this attack by the constant drumbeat of anti white propaganda being disseminated day and night.

But I am not going to dismiss that as a possibility.

But you're acting like a white version of Radio Rwanda.

Am I?

Where have I said blacks are, by virtue of being black, all black supremacists?

And then, from making that assumption, go on to say that black supremacy and blackness itself, is a poison, an existential threat to the entire nation and must be stamped and eradicated?

You want me to unilaterally disarm in the face of a Marxist mob that is whipping themselves up into a frenzy to exterminate me.

Why?
 
Last edited:
Then there's Jaden Hayden.

He was the 20 year "youth" who beat aged veteran Norman Bledsoe to death in one of Wretched Gretchen's COVID nursing home Death Camps.

He skated and had all charges dropped, due to "mental illness".

Even though it was reported in 2020, at the time of the attack he had YouTube videos with "racial remarks" in them.

If it turns out that the same thing is true in this situation, look for the same outcome.

The only difference being, Joan Naydich will likely survive her beating.

Norm Bledsoe did not.
 
Last edited:
Probably not a popular opinion but I don't think special needs should be in school with the gp.

Government schools are child abuse.

They most certainly are.

I have a slightly different view. Any child with violent tendencies should not be in general population. Some special needs kids aren't prone to violence. (Down syndrome for example). Some otherwise normal kids become violent for reasons that have nothing to do with being special needs. I was mentoring some project kids decades ago who were model students when it came to behavior while they were in elementary school. But everything turned south when they went to middle school. The boys got involved with the Gangsta Disciples gang which was rampant in that school and started getting in to trouble. At one point one got at home suspension. (I'm not sure what for). The school didn't let him take his books home. When his mom told me that I thought "Oh that just treated her that was because she's not educated. I've got a masters degree from one of the state's top universities. They'll listen to me. Clearly they want this young man not to fall behind in school." So I went to the school, talked to the male vice principal who was African (as in from the continent) and he said "Sure you can take the books home. I'm so happy you want to help the young man." I was about to take my victory lap when I was stopped the principal, who was a black woman and a PBH (psycho b**** from hell). "What do YOU think YOU'RE doing?" She said. I told her I was getting the boy's books so he wouldn't fall behind in school. "Let me tell you about R. He's just a thug. He wants to be a thug. And all he's going to be is a thug." Taken about from such hate coming at a black child from a black woman in authority I responded with "Well he never gives us any trouble in the church youth group." Why did I say that? That just made the PBH angrier. "Well YOU don't have him all week!" Had I been on my A game I would have said "Well maybe if he was away from YOU all week and in a decent school with a principal that wasn't a hateful PBH he wouldn't be in a gang." Needless to say I didn't get the books. Later that same year he was suspended again for a longer period and sent to an alternative school. And guess what? In the alternative school he got straight A's! I begged his mother to please keep him in the alternative school. She wanted to keep him in the alternative school. He wanted to go back to the regular school were his "friends" were (fellow gang members) and sadly they sent him back. Eventually he did end up in prison but he's out now and seems to have gotten his life on track.

But yes, I agree with you and [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION] that government schools are often child abuse. On the flip side my cousin was a principal decades later in the same school district and in her school the kids were respectful and all at grade level or above academically. In fact at one point hers was the public only school that wasn't a magnet or charter school that was also not on academic probation with the state.

Lastly, AF keeps bringing up "Radio Rwanda." Well...that was black on black! I've watched Hotel Rwanda about 20 times. AND THE WHITE FRENCH GOVERNMENT ARMED THE HUTU GENOCIDAL MIITIAS! And Which reminds me of when I was trying to convince R to get out of the GDs. I told him "Your gang kills other black people." He was like "Well the klan kills black people so why can't black people kill black people?" The idea that the criminal minority in the black community has its sights set on white people is just laughable. The Nation Of Islam which feeds its members a steady diet of "hate whitey" isn't going around committing random killings of anybody. (They have been known to do targeted revenge killings which is why the Italian Mafia is on record of being afraid of the Nation Of Islam.) But right now we have a trial going on in Georgia of "Young Thug" who bragged in songs played on the radio about killing other black people. (I know. He's innocent until proven guilty). Who owns these radio stations that pump this garbage out on the airwaves? White people. Before Ronald Reagan deregulated radio stations, the black popular radio stations in many southern cities would not play rap music because the owners were older culturally conservative black men. Now, thanks to a "conservative Republican", Young Thug gets played everywhere on the corporate "Clear Channel" owned stations. So the same company owns the stations that put on the gangsta rap and the stations that carry conservative talk shows that rail against the same gangsta rap. It was also Ronald Reagan that brought crack into the black community to finance his dirty war in Nicaragua. I guess Reagan was really a "Marxist Jacobin?" Or is there something even more sinister than that afoot?

/rant
 
I understand perfectly what you are saying. And if he was having mental health issues that manifested as violence, then yes, by all means he should have been isolated.

But we don't know that. All we know is he was a "special needs" student. That could mean he had a reading problem.

Everything else you wrote is an effort to point out that there is no conclusive proof to say that this kid acted with racial animus towards the teacher he beat down.

I'm willing to concede that point, because it's true, I don't know what was in his mind, which is why "hate crimes" are a ridiculous concept.

It is pure speculation on my part that he may have been "radicalized" into this attack by the constant drumbeat of anti white propaganda being disseminated day and night.

But I am not going to dismiss that as a possibility.



Am I?

Where have I said blacks are, by virtue of being black, all black supremacists?

And then, from making that assumption, go on to say that black supremacy and blackness itself, is a poison, an existential threat to the entire nation and must be stamped and eradicated?

You want me to unilaterally disarm in the face of a Marxist mob that is whipping themselves up into a frenzy to exterminate me.

Why?

You answered your own question which I put in bold. One way to inflame racial hatred is to make everything about race even when there is no evidence of a racial motive. That's what black lives matter did and one of the reasons I do NOT support BLM. Al Sharpton at the funeral of the black man killed by 5 black police officers tried to make it about race. I didn't hear him say "whites are, by virtue of being white, all white supremacists." Maybe he has at some point, I don't know. But can we agree that someone that makes everything bad that happens to black people about race when sometimes it isn't is fanning racial hatred even if that person has "white allies" that he doesn't think are white supremacists?

I give you Exhibit A of my proof that Al Sharpton doesn't treat every white person as a white supremacist.

Db6IE_CV4AAwH01.jpg
 
You want me to unilaterally disarm in the face of a Marxist mob that is whipping themselves up into a frenzy to exterminate me.

When mobs reach a frenzy, they rarely make it out of the immediate neighborhood, and are no more likely to hit their target than a poorly thrown grenade.

And Marxists don't do anything on account of their own volition. If they could, they wouldn't have to be Marxist. If that herd of cows moves at all, it's because someone has them by the rings in their noses.

Racism is played up by politics. Always has been.



Now is no different. It may not require any politics to set pallets of bricks in downtown Kenosha, but it takes politics of the first order to ensure they don't get removed before the riot.

The only difference is, I don't recall the powers that be declaring their own ethnic group to be the one to be persecuted before. If there's an award for chutzpah, they deserve it. They do know how to shake things up, these psychos. It certainly wasn't a move I was expecting.

They certainly don't care who winds up killing whom, as long as there's blood. If they get one race all hyped up to exterminate the other and instead they turn on themselves while waiting for the bus to the Designated Riot Scene, I'm sure they'll be tickled to get a refund on the bus rental.
 
Last edited:
Lastly, AF keeps bringing up "Radio Rwanda." Well...that was black on black! I've watched Hotel Rwanda about 20 times. AND THE WHITE FRENCH GOVERNMENT ARMED THE HUTU GENOCIDAL MIITIAS!

Of course it was black on black, that's the most absurd irony of the Rwandan genocide, that two black ethnic groups, with equally sounding silly names, and the very slightest of differences in background, financial well being, skin tone and land ownership, could be whipped up into a violent orgy of killing that led to, in terms of a percentage of the population killed, one of the worst genocides in all of recorded history, is the point I am making.

It only took less than a year of Radio Rwanda propaganda and the assassination of Juvénal Habyarimana to bring that about.

What do you think would happen if, let's say, Barack Obama and his family were assassinated by a for real, or even false flag, white supremacist?

And the Marxist media organs took the propaganda to the next level?

The idea that the criminal minority in the black community has its sights set on white people is just laughable. The Nation Of Islam which feeds its members a steady diet of "hate whitey" isn't going around committing random killings of anybody. (They have been known to do targeted revenge killings which is why the Italian Mafia is on record of being afraid of the Nation Of Islam.)

No, white Marxists have their sights set on me.

They just figure blacks will do the heavy lifting for them.

Ten years before the propaganda machines got cranked up, black homicides of whites were seven times higher than white homicides of blacks.


But right now we have a trial going on in Georgia of "Young Thug" who bragged in songs played on the radio about killing other black people. (I know. He's innocent until proven guilty). Who owns these radio stations that pump this garbage out on the airwaves? White people. Before Ronald Reagan deregulated radio stations, the black popular radio stations in many southern cities would not play rap music because the owners were older culturally conservative black men. Now, thanks to a "conservative Republican", Young Thug gets played everywhere on the corporate "Clear Channel" owned stations. So the same company owns the stations that put on the gangsta rap and the stations that carry conservative talk shows that rail against the same gangsta rap. It was also Ronald Reagan that brought crack into the black community to finance his dirty war in Nicaragua. I guess Reagan was really a "Marxist Jacobin?" Or is there something even more sinister than that afoot?

No, Ronnie was a market de-regulator, at least before he got shot.

What he failed to take into account was that the Marxist mob would bring it's long march to "entertainment" as well.

They are wreckers, and thus everything they create is ugly, destructive and wrecking.

And what does that say about us, willing to allow that shit into our homes in the first place?

Most "consumers" of gangsta rap, are young white idiots.

Many parents are too browbeaten and scared to try and limit and restrict it, for fear of be called...c'mon Jack, you know, the thing...
 
It was also Ronald Reagan that brought crack into the black community to finance his dirty war in Nicaragua

Oh, forgot to address this.

You know, to this day, I still don't believe he had any real knowledge of what was going on in the White House basement.

By his second term, he was pretty dim.

Not as bad as Slow Joe, but getting there,

Not an excuse of course, just the way I see it.

And that was a hell of a beta test.

Chinese fentanyl and opium, under government protection, are killing 100,000 mostly young white men each year nowadays.
 
You answered your own question which I put in bold. One way to inflame racial hatred is to make everything about race even when there is no evidence of a racial motive. That's what black lives matter did and one of the reasons I do NOT support BLM. Al Sharpton at the funeral of the black man killed by 5 black police officers tried to make it about race. I didn't hear him say "whites are, by virtue of being white, all white supremacists." Maybe he has at some point, I don't know.

I'm not sure Sharpton has, but he's not au courant anyways.

That the Ibrim Kendi school that says that.

But can we agree that someone that makes everything bad that happens to black people about race when sometimes it isn't is fanning racial hatred even if that person has "white allies" that he doesn't think are white supremacists?

Yes, I don't think I ever disputed that.
 
I encourage everyone to watch the movie, I Was a Communist for the FBI.

Not surprisingly, I could not find a youtube clip of this scene, but it is as relevant today as it was in 1951.

The background is that Cvetic is an FBI agent that has infiltrated a commie group attempting to radicalize the black populace.


Gerhardt Eisler : A very enjoyable evening. Close the door. Blandon, you did exceedingly well

Jim Blandon : [chuckles] Thanks. Those ******* ate it up, didn't they?

Matt Cvetic : You mean, Negroes, don't you, Jim?

Jim Blandon : [shrugs] Only when I'm trying to sell them the party line

Gerhardt Eisler : They're very useful comrades

Matt Cvetic : There's going to be trouble on the streets tonight

Jim Blandon : Well, if there isn't, I've been wasting the Party's time. Anyone want a drink? Do you mind?

Gerhardt Eisler : Go ahead

Jim Blandon : Comrades, comrades! You know, Matt calls them comrades too, only he believes it. You see, Matt, if one of that crowd goes out into the street tonight and picks a fight with a white man, and... well, kills him maybe... then he gets convicted by a White jury, we can go to bat and raise a defence fund. Am I correct, Mr Eisler?

Gerhardt Eisler : Ahha... just like in the Scottsboro case

Jim Blandon : Exactly, do you know that the Party raised nearly two million? Yes, nearly two million dollars just to defend those six ******* and all it cost was 65,000...

Gerhardt Eisler : ...to lose the case

Jim Blandon : Right. Yes, we made a tremendous profit on that deal. Shall I tell him what was done with it?

Gerhardt Eisler : No, no. No, Blandon. I am afraid the National Committee wouldn't like that

Matt Cvetic : In other words, Jim, your speech had a double purpose

Jim Blandon : Bright boy, Matt. The Pittsburgh Branch needs dough. We're always in the red!
 
I'm not sure Sharpton has, but he's not au courant anyways.

That the Ibrim Kendi school that says that.
I had to Google Ibrim Kendi. I'm pretty sure then mentally unstable thug in the OP never heard of him. He probably has no clue who Rev. Al Sharpton is either. The connection you keep trying to draw in this instance just doesn't exist. I don't think the every white person who did something to hurt some black person was necessarily inlunced by Tom Metzker either.

Yes, I don't think I ever disputed that.

Great! Glad we agree. Don't be a white Al Sharpton.
 
Of course it was black on black, that's the most absurd irony of the Rwandan genocide, that two black ethnic groups, with equally sounding silly names, and the very slightest of differences in background, financial well being, skin tone and land ownership, could be whipped up into a violent orgy of killing that led to, in terms of a percentage of the population killed, one of the worst genocides in all of recorded history, is the point I am making.

About the same time whites were killing whites in the Balkans for similarly stupid reasons and that's happening again in Russia/Ukraine. I saw a YouTube where a woman from the Balkans explained how it happened. Each side would take any killing done to their side and magnify it at take any killing done by their side an minimize it.

It only took less than a year of Radio Rwanda propaganda and the assassination of Juvénal Habyarimana to bring that about.

What do you think would happen if, let's say, Barack Obama and his family were assassinated by a for real, or even false flag, white supremacist?

And the Marxist media organs took the propaganda to the next level?

But it DIDN'T happen. What if a nuclear exchange during the Cuban missile crisis wiped out the entire world? That DIDN"T happen either. Obessing over what ifs about things that are already in this past isn't healthy.

No, white Marxists have their sights set on me.

They just figure blacks will do the heavy lifting for them.

Meh. Must easier to fund gain of function research (thanks Fauci), fund experimental vaccines (thanks Trump), mandate people to take the vaccines (thanks Biden). You know the only person who kinda, sorta DID do the right thing with regards to COVID? Why the "black Marxist" Barack Obama. He at least temporarilly put the breaks on funding for gain of function research. It started back up as soon as Trump became president. Look it up.

Next we have a chemical weapon set off in the mostly white town of Palestine Ohio. The train should have had electronic pneumatic brakes. But corporate regulators talked Trump into changing the regulations so that the didn't cover vinyl chloride.

Ten years before the propaganda machines got cranked up, black homicides of whites were seven times higher than white homicides of blacks.

I'm calling BS on that stat.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ows-incorrect-homicide-stats-race/5739522002/

https://www.ibtimes.com/white-black...statistics-show-more-killings-between-2424598

No, Ronnie was a market de-regulator, at least before he got shot.

THAT'S EXACLTY WHAT I SAID! AND IN THIS CASE THAT WAS THE PROBLEM!{/B]

What Ronald Reagan did with radio stations was much worse than what you complain about regarding "Big Tech." Anybody can create their own compeitior to Twitter. Hell, I wrote my own Twitter clone, complete with the ability to post pictures and video, in my spare time. I still have the source code. And when Elon Musk bought out Twitter, the angry libs started running to Maestondon. Rumble, Bitchute and Odeysee are competing with YouTube. I was pointing out YEARS ago on this forum that alternative platforms are the answer to Big Tech. There is no FCC requirement to set up a website.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...edia-Platform-Liberdon-com&highlight=mastodon
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?557149-HOW-TO-Embedding-videos

Now, contrast that with radio. If you try to set up your own full power FM radio station without FCC approval this is what happens.



So all Ronny boy's "deregulation" did was pave the was for corporate consolidation.

What he failed to take into account was that the Marxist mob would bring it's long march to "entertainment" as well.

What he failed to account for is corportism. Or perhaps he didn't fail at all. Maybe everything happened according to plan.

They are wreckers, and thus everything they create is ugly, destructive and wrecking.

And what does that say about us, willing to allow that $#@! into our homes in the first place?

Most "consumers" of gangsta rap, are young white idiots.

Many parents are too browbeaten and scared to try and limit and restrict it, for fear of be called...c'mon Jack, you know, the thing...

Vanilla Ice Ice baby!

Oh, forgot to address this.

You know, to this day, I still don't believe he had any real knowledge of what was going on in the White House basement.

By his second term, he was pretty dim.

Not as bad as Slow Joe, but getting there,

Not an excuse of course, just the way I see it.

And that was a hell of a beta test.

Chinese fentanyl and opium, under government protection, are killing 100,000 mostly young white men each year nowadays.

Okay. Let Ronny Boy off the hook. That still leaves conservative hero, criminal turned senator Oliver North. I was listening to local conservative radio personality Phil Valentine (our own [MENTION=991]Matt Collins[/MENTION] knew him), admit on his radio show that the CIA has now admitted to putting crack in the black community. But Mr. Valentine excused this by saying "But it wasn't about racism. It was done to fight communism." Yipie kyay cowboy! While you're worried about marxism attacking your community, those fighting marxists have been destorying my community in the name of fighting marxism. Explain that one to me.
 
Back
Top