FINAL WARNING $440000 Bill IS READY FOR DOWNLOAD~ CHIP-IN and PRINT/DISTRIBUTE

I'll work as hard as I can.

If not, there's some links to a couple good pdf's burried in this thread. I think on page 2.
 
Good work all. I really tried to keep my text to a minimum, but I just couldn't bring myself to cut certain things because they explain how Dr. Paul would get us out of this mess. Maybe someone else can find a better way to reach undecided voters. I agree with everyone though on the revolution thing. We want this to go out to those who might see the revolution as a 'fringe' thing, so we want to take that out if possible. I do disagree on the bill format though, because I think most voters will become ANTI-Paul if they are tricked like that.

I'm surprised that Americans have gotten so lazy that they won't read a two page document, but it is an accurate critique that I have received from my meetup group and from online here.

Rhys, can you send me something I can bring to hand out at the caucus tonight in Louisiana?
email: [email protected]
At the very least print up the two page version if Rhys isn't finished in time. It's better than nothing, especially if people are sitting in a caucus with nothing to do and waiting for it to get started.
 
Here's the question we need to ask ourselves.

I just printed the full text and it's 4 pages long with NO formating and NO layout.

How much do we want to cut? Right now I'm designing a legal sized one page handout, front and back. With that, I expect to cut up to 50% of the text.

OR

I can layout a nice 6 page handout with all the text.

OR

I can do both.
 
Here's the question we need to ask ourselves.

I just printed the full text and it's 4 pages long with NO formating and NO layout.

How much do we want to cut? Right now I'm designing a legal sized one page handout, front and back. With that, I expect to cut up to 50% of the text.

OR

I can layout a nice 6 page handout with all the text.

OR

I can do both.
4 pages long? It should fit into two pages. I was going for a front and back handout to save on costs.
 
page 1
2209561129_3fec072de9_b_d.jpg


page 2
2211635111_3738189006_b_d.jpg
 
this hasn't been my day.

Ok, Torchbearer... I'm trying like hell.

I'll probably end up sending you a cover page to place on top of regular text pages. no offence rpfan, but I wouldn't use that graphical version tonight. It would be better to just give them something they can actually read, even if it's plain.

That's just for tonight... I'll be ready to send it in a few. My comp just rebooted so I'm taking a break to report in.

I'll keep polishing the finished product for final distribution and be done tonight.
 
Ok ok, this is NOT it but you can use it tonight in LA. What I would do is take the text and print it and put this on top. This is a rush job.

Here's the pdf. please don't hammer the server. it's a small server. I posted a jpg so you don't have to load it if you're not using it. thx. :)

http://normlnj.org/non_affiliated/tax-bill-cover.pdf

tax-bill-cover.jpg


I can't wait for OLED. I'd put a YouTube video right in the middle of this bad boy.
 
Last edited:
Please DROP the RevolUTION talk.

Cut down the text by at least half. Otherwise people won't read it.
 
there are A LOT of words in all of them, try to make a simpler easy to follow for the shepple
 
Ok ok, this is NOT it but you can use it tonight in LA. What I would do is take the text and print it and put this on top. This is a rush job.

Here's the pdf. please don't hammer the server. it's a small server. I posted a jpg so you don't have to load it if you're not using it. thx. :)

http://normlnj.org/non_affiliated/tax-bill-cover.pdf

tax-bill-cover.jpg


I can't wait for OLED. I'd put a YouTube video right in the middle of this bad boy.
Unfortunately, "Owes" is a dishonest representation of what Mr. Walker is saying. "has a fiscal burden" is what he is saying. There is a difference between 'owes' and 'has a fiscal burden'. Owes means they definitely have to pay it. Having a fiscal burden means that the government will need that much and the debt is estimated based on each household.
 
Unfortunately, "Owes" is a dishonest representation of what Mr. Walker is saying. "has a fiscal burden" is what he is saying. There is a difference between 'owes' and 'has a fiscal burden'. Owes means they definitely have to pay it. Having a fiscal burden means that the government will need that much and the debt is estimated based on each household.

yeah, but who's gonna sue?

all's fair in love and campaigning... ask Hilary

misleading and lying are two diferent things. I know it sucks but it works

actualy when i think of it, owes is right anyway cause where else will they get it?
 
Last edited:
yeah, but who's gonna sue?

all's fair in love and campaigning... ask Hilary

misleading and lying are two diferent things. I know it sucks but it works

actualy when i think of it, owes is right anyway cause where else will they get it?
What Would Ron Do?

Do you REALLY want people putting Ron Paul and Hillary side by side with similar campaigning practices?

My premise for the beginning part of the document is what Mr. Walker said. I am not twisting his words. His words are sufficient enough to wake up the people, but noone knows about it. Heck, I hadn't even heard about it until someone posted the Glenn Beck/David Walker clip. While it may be true that we will all owe this eventually, it is still dishonest in pertaining to what David Walker is saying and I think will turn ALOT of voters away from Paul if they saw this wording and started researching the sources I provide.
 
What Would Ron Do?

Do you REALLY want people putting Ron Paul and Hillary side by side with similar campaigning practices?

My premise for the beginning part of the document is what Mr. Walker said. I am not twisting his words. His words are sufficient enough to wake up the people, but noone knows about it. Heck, I hadn't even heard about it until someone posted the Glenn Beck/David Walker clip. While it may be true that we will all owe this eventually, it is still dishonest in pertaining to what David Walker is saying and I think will turn ALOT of voters away from Paul if they saw this wording and started researching the sources I provide.

How about this:

What the U.S. Government needs from Every Houshold -
$440,000
 
What Would Ron Do?

Do you REALLY want people putting Ron Paul and Hillary side by side with similar campaigning practices?

My premise for the beginning part of the document is what Mr. Walker said. I am not twisting his words. His words are sufficient enough to wake up the people, but noone knows about it. Heck, I hadn't even heard about it until someone posted the Glenn Beck/David Walker clip. While it may be true that we will all owe this eventually, it is still dishonest in pertaining to what David Walker is saying and I think will turn ALOT of voters away from Paul if they saw this wording and started researching the sources I provide.

I didn't say David Walker said it... really. That was my line. He's quoted accuratly. If you really insist, it is your project... BUT remember this... your wording for a headline is going to get this thing thrown in the trash. it starts too complicated, and just gets worse from there. you've done some really excelent work but if you'll trust me for now, wait until I'm finished. I'll package the whole thing... I think Ron would package better if he knew how. hehe

And yes, I would pay money (well...) to see Ron Paul with half the slick package of Hilary.

maybe I don't know what the definition of fiscal burden is?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top