Looks like cops or military or similarly uniformed hut-hut types were responsible for at least some of the fires.
So according to the below chart and the story as unfolded by Mr. Wilson’s account, the flow of evidence seems to further show that the official narrative is a fabrication.
Putting all of the running and driving back and forth stuff aside, Brown’s corpse ended up over 150-feet from the initial point of contact within a timeframe of less than 2-minutes. More concerning however, is the large spread in bullet casings throughout the crime-scene, approximating a 20-foot southward spread and a 177-foot westward spread. Thus indicating that this solo officer who was in such fear of his life that one more jab to the face would put him down for the count was in fact actively pursuing him and not only that but discharging his firearm using multiple small groups while doing so, e.g., 4-rounds at a respective distance of 30-feet, 3-rounds at 40-feet, 3-rounds at 50-feet, and the initial 2-rounds at around 200-feet. Is it just a coincidence that he fired happened to fire just about as many rounds as his firearm holds in one magazine?
![]()
Also, it might be pointed out that the whole Brown had charged Wilson like an NFL linebacker, with all the speed of an agile gazelle, could easily be taken out of context by the official narrative. Meaning that the angle of entry-exit wounds could be attributed not to Brown leaning in to charge down Wilson, but as a desperate means of either absorbing the recoil of being relentlessly struck by a score of bullets or in effort to remain standing as certain death loomed mere feet away until he was so weakened he finally came crashing down straight onto his face.
Further, don’t most people wait to lean in for a tackle until only a few feet remains before contact will be made, so exactly how close was Wilson to Brown while all of this running around was taking place?
It's simple folks, really.
Read the autopsy reports. There are two published ones.
Read them in full.
Then watch the interview that Officer Wilson gave. He described the shooting sequence in quite a bit of detail.
The important thing to note is that he described Brown as charging him full-tilt, he shot, and Brown went down face first with his momentum throwing his feet forward up over his back.
That statement, if true, is sufficient to deem the shooting as justified.
But note the fact that this encounter occurred and Brown went down on pavement.
Wilson said he went down at a full run, face-first, with enough momentum to throw his feet up over his back.
Yet the autopsies do not contain any evidence of 300+ lb Brown's face being turned into hamburger by said full-run impact onto the road -- an impact that Officer Wilson says, both on TV and under oath, occurred and to which he was not only a witness but the closest person to it and the person who caused it.
The physical evidence just is. The story told by various witnesses and actors must match the physical evidence or they are either (1) wrong or (2) lying.
This is why I pushed originally for an indictment and trial. Through a trial we get cross-examination of every witness. We get the Medical Examiners on the stand who are asked point blank: In your professional opinion are Brown's facial injuries consistent with dropping as Officer Wilson described? It is plausible to believe that Officer Wilson's account is accurate?
I do not know what the truth is but what I do know is that nobody goes down at a full run on pavement without any unprotected body surface that takes said impact being materially damaged. Road rash sucks and I've fallen while running on pavement; it was not fun at all and if you're conscious when it happens you typically will try to shield your body with your hands (resulting in significant scrape damage on your hands.
If you can't get your arms in front of you (because you're dead, for instance) then whatever hits the ground will get the hamburger treatment.
In this case Brown was instantly killed by the last shot to the head. That much has been established.
The entirety of whether this was a justified shoot or manslaughter (or worse) turns on whether Brown was charging Wilson at the time he fired.
That's the beginning and end of it.
[...] all that matters here is whether Brown was charging Wilson at the time Wilson fired the fatal shots.
The entirety of whether this was a justified shoot or manslaughter (or worse) turns on whether Brown was charging Wilson at the time he fired.
...
Police have not spoken to Head about his actions, but they intend to do so, Jackson said Tuesday, adding that multiple law enforcement agencies were involved in the investigation.
The police chief told TV and radio host Sean Hannity something similar Monday, but he didn't classify the probe as formal.
"We are pursuing those comments, and there's a lot of discussion going on about that right now, but I really can't get into that at this time," he said.
But police aren't singling out Head, Jackson told Hannity.
...
No it isn't.
First, it's rioting and looting for the fun and profit of it, merely using the Brown case as an excuse.
Second, it's pro "social justice" activism (aka socialist agitation), merely using the Brown case as an excuse.
I doubt that 1 in 10 expressing strong feelings about this actually care whether Wilson murdered Brown.
This is what usually happens with these highly publicized cases; they become mere slogans in a larger social conflict.
A famous historical parallel would be the Dreyfus Affair (which had very little to do with Alfred Dreyfus).
. The acknowledgment came after a review by KSDK found several key documents were missing from the thousands of pages released by McCulloch's office on November 24, shortly after the prosecutor announced that the grand jury had decided not to indict Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson.
Update: Ferguson prosecutor caught in lie, not all documents were released.
http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/loca...guson-grand-jury-documents-withheld/20077183/
So instead of coming out and saying the document package was incomplete, they tried to manage the narrative and got caught. Imagine that, politician lie. Yet another indication of the systemic nature of the corruption.
XNN
DOJ announces it will not file charges against Zimmerman in Martin shooting
Published time: March 12, 2015 05:25
Protestors block a police vehicle from entering the City of Ferguson Police Department and Municipal Court parking lot in Ferguson Missouri, March 11, 2015 (Reuters / Kate Munsch)
At least two police officers have been shot during a protest outside Ferguson Police Station, according to reports by local media.
Multiple accounts of the turmoil outside the Ferguson police station have emerged on social media.
One witness said on Twitter that a policeman had been shot in the face.
Ferguson Lt. Col. Al Eickhoff told the St. Louis Post-Dispatchhe didn't think either of the officers were from his department. He also would not comment on the extent of their injuries. Eickhoff is currently interim police chief in Ferguson after Tom Jackson resigned from the post, officially stepping down on March 19.
(READ MORE: Ferguson police chief resigns following DOJ report)
Police reportedly say the department is under lockdown and describe what’s happening outside as an “active shooting scene.”
RT @NewsRevo: Carrying the officer away and guns drawn. #ferguson | pic via @wyze43 | @NewsRevo pic.twitter.com/W0X8xoDltQ”
10:29 PM - 11 Mar 2015
@MZHemingway
Lord, have mercy RT @bobhoehn_stl: Two officers shot in Ferguson. First ambulance leaving from scene.
10:33 PM - 11 Mar 2015
@GrantGambling
Follow
Yeah--someone just shot at them. RT “@deray: Rifles drawn. Ferguson PD. pic.twitter.com/pfNoCQwNFH”
@TWiBnation
Follow
#BREAKING: Shots fired during protest in #Ferguson. Cop shot. Reports sayt it came from a house up the hill from the PD. Not from Protestors
blow back?
2 shots, 2 down....someone is a good shot....another cop shooting at cops?
“Black Lives Matter” protesters who were apparently hired to cause a ruckus in Ferguson, Missouri, are angry because, they say, they haven’t been paid for their hard work.
So they’ve launched a #CutTheCheck hashtag on Twitter and held a sit-in at the offices of Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment, or MORE – the successor group to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, in Missouri.
The protesters have received as much as $5,000 a month to generate civil unrest in the troubled suburb of St. Louis, according to FrontPage Mag’s Matthew Vadum.
“MORE is the re-branded Missouri branch of ACORN, which filed for bankruptcy in late 2010,” Vadum reported. “MORE and other groups supporting the Black Lives Matter movement have received millions of dollars from billionaire financier George Soros.”
moreatlink