Ferguson decision is in -- NO INDICTMENT

This is all being setup/staged by the CIA/FBI. Good ole divide and conquer coming to a city near you. They're just bursting at the seems to instill Martial Law. They'll use it as cover during the coming currency crisis. So obvious what's going on.
 
O'Reilly just lead with the Guy Fawkes masks and anonymous being part of the problem in Ferguson. Mentioned that the masks were banned in NYC after 9/11.
 
I'm no fan of the police state by any means....but, lets be honest. This kid Brown was most likely guilty and got what was coming to him just like Trayvon Martin.

Both these guys were thugs, and in no way should be viewed as heroes by the liberty movement.
 
O'Reilly just lead with the Guy Fawkes masks and anonymous being part of the problem in Ferguson. Mentioned that the masks were banned in NYC after 9/11.

Wow that is new to me. Masks can now be banned in America? Too much freedom?
 
I'm no fan of the police state by any means....but, lets be honest. This kid Brown was most likely guilty and got what was coming to him just like Trayvon Martin.

Both these guys were thugs, and in no way should be viewed as heroes by the liberty movement.

What did Trayvon Martin do again? Walking while black? Sounds like you would make A GREAT spokesman for the police state.
 
This is all being setup/staged by the CIA/FBI. Good ole divide and conquer coming to a city near you. They're just bursting at the seems to instill Martial Law. They'll use it as cover during the coming currency crisis. So obvious what's going on.

Nice to know we have boots on the ground giving us inside information.
 
I'm no fan of the police state by any means....but, lets be honest. This kid Brown was most likely guilty and got what was coming to him just like Trayvon Martin.

Both these guys were thugs, and in no way should be viewed as heroes by the liberty movement.

Fug ya very much for your input. Have big ole neg rep. Don't know how long it took ya to build up your "has much to be proud of" value but it is time to diminish it.
 
Highly unlikely he's getting indicted. Hasn't received a call from the prosecutor's office as of two hours ago.
 
I'm no fan of the police state by any means....but, lets be honest. This kid Brown was most likely guilty and got what was coming to him just like Trayvon Martin.

Both these guys were thugs, and in no way should be viewed as heroes by the liberty movement.

Can you give a list of the crimes for which the 'most likely guilty' should be summarily executed?
 
Ive got my fingers crossed for racial retribution.
I hope those stupid liberal white kids get their asses stomped o pay for dey whyte priddlidge.
 
What did Trayvon Martin do again? Walking while black? Sounds like you would make A GREAT spokesman for the police state.

Not supporting thugs doesn't mean you support the militarization of the police and instances of unjust police brutality. But in the case of one Trayvon Martin (and now Michael Brown)...he/they got what was coming to him. There are consequences for being a violent idiot.
 
Last edited:
As I have stated elsewhere- the local community has had it and is making it's protest statement. Shouldn't freedom lovers agree with this instead of belittling those that are finally standing their ground?

If people are upset when something happens in their area, then they should be the first one's to stand against what they see as injustice.

I haven't belittled anybody, but both sides of this are getting played by the media. We always see protests and riots when the decedent is guilty, and we always hear crickets when the decedent is innocent. The same pattern all over the country, every time. This is not being driven by locals getting fed up, this is being driven by a deceitful and evil M$M machine unafraid to profit off of blood.

When the same pattern emerges everywhere all the time, you look for commonalities. The locals are different in every event, so that is not a commonality. The commonality is the media. They play up and hype up the ones they think the decedent is guilty because riots over guilty people increase tensions and divisions and controversy, which in turn increases commercial revenue.

I'm not belittling the citizens of Ferguson, they are the victims of media deceit.

Why do YOU think people go apeshit over the Trayvons and the Browns, but can't even be bothered to lift a finger over the BouBous and the Gurleys? Is it that people just love the guilty and hate the innocent, or is there a deeper connection driving this perverse pattern?
 
Back
Top