Feds warn Texas not to enforce state-level immigration bill

image.png

Yeah, see, that's how it always is when push come to shove. If the precious law isn't working for working for you, then it's on. What "on" is going to look like, I dunno.
 
Yeah, see, that's how it always is when push come to shove. If the precious law isn't working for working for you, then it's on. What "on" is going to look like, I dunno.

I don't see DC winning the shoving-match here. Have you looked at a map of the Texas border? Except for right around Neuvo Laredo and a couple other smaller towns, there is nothing out there. It's over 1,200 miles long. The very same factors (remoteness, length of the border, etc.) that permit the Cabal to play these stupid demographic-warfare games, will permit long, drawn-out civil disobedience by patriotic Americans who are fed up with DC's bullshit. So, if they want to play clown-games, there are plenty of us who are ready to strap-up and get clown-y. Sure, the US government always has the power to deploy the military in principle, but the political cost of that is very, very high, so even the maniacs operating the Resident Biden-puppet will be hesitant to flip that particular power-lever. In short, they will have no choice but to dance, and two can dance this particular Tango...
 
Last edited:
The border with Mexico used to be a lot more "open". It was still controlled but pretty casual with Mexicans and Americans moving back and forth freely. I'm not sure when it changed - probably with Bush and 9/11.

https://time.com/6324599/bidens-trump-history-border-wall/


A while ago I was reading the book dictated to another prisoner by Marco Polo. Most of where he traveled was wine open and without barriers (what a world!) but it was tribal and if someone didn't like you passing through they'd kill you. Point being, even in those times movement wasn't always so free or came with extreme risks.


My definition of border: an outline of a country where rules are established by a people, in our case, the Constitution, specifically the Bill of Rights, where the 4thA, and 2ndA absolutely should apply. It does not equate to an East/West Berlin Wall or China Wall being built along the border north of the Rio Grande, or a "Constitution-Free-Zone" which unfortunately was established. The root problem is with government, NGO's and contracts with the Security and Prison Industrial Complexes who lobby for tax payer money. The immigrants coming over are a coordinated effort in order to Grow the Fed and the complexes who profit by it. Blame is placed on innocents while we continue to lose our rights.


Last, I'd like to apologize to you for my remark associating you with cluster B personalities. I don't even remember the conversation content (something about Marx) but I will say it was my bad and my failure to follow what you were conveying or to understand where you're coming from. It was not nice of me and I was wrong.

I have thick skin - I'm known to dine at the very finest of restaurants, and right after tear it up at the most brutal biker bars one can imagine, all while having fun ;-)

I likewise apologize to you :-)
 
My definition of border: an outline of a country where rules are established by a people, in our case, the Constitution, specifically the Bill of Rights, where the 4thA, and 2ndA absolutely should apply. It does not equate to an East/West Berlin Wall or China Wall being built along the border north of the Rio Grande, or a "Constitution-Free-Zone" which unfortunately was established. The root problem is with government, NGO's and contracts with the Security and Prison Industrial Complexes who lobby for tax payer money. The immigrants coming over are a coordinated effort in order to Grow the Fed and the complexes who profit by it. Blame is placed on innocents while we continue to lose our rights.

Agree and that's the way it should be. I see the migrants as pawns in a very evil game. At the very least, because the welfare state cannot just be switched off overnight, it needs to be closed to non citizens. Motivation to come would nearly evaporate, then. Those fucking NGOs go south of the border and tell them they'll get free everything here so who wouldn't give it a shot?
 
I'm skeptical.

As am I, always.

While Massie's 1% cut was written into law, and signed by Biden, it only takes effect in the event of a standard CR. So far, TPTB (including Speaker Johnson), have avoided that law by doing "short term" CRs. And they will be more than happy to do 3 month CRs until hell freezes over, or until they pass a new law (budget, CR, Omnibus) that over-rides existing law which dictates 1% for an actual longer term CR.

My skepticism based on the reality on Twitter:


https://twitter.com/USAB4L/status/1750616677698687226
 
Last edited:
Agree and that's the way it should be. I see the migrants as pawns in a very evil game. At the very least, because the welfare state cannot just be switched off overnight, it needs to be closed to non citizens. Motivation to come would nearly evaporate, then. Those $#@!ing NGOs go south of the border and tell them they'll get free everything here so who wouldn't give it a shot?

I have considered that, but even if everything becomes sealed shut, the .gov, ngo's and complexes will utilize whatever other tactics in order to increase their profit margins. I don't see the problem going away at all until the people put pressure on their reps to put an end to the incentives and demand an end to the Constitution-Free-Zone. In fact, I do foresee even more violations of our rights if everything does get sealed shut, to the likes we haven't seen. At that point it will be irreversible like every other government program. Meanwhile, I am not willing to give up any of my rights, not for security, not for anything - I'll be the lone-man standing.
 
... I think even Rothbard said that you can either have open borders or a welfare state, but you can't have both.
...

If that's true, then it's a point in favor of having open borders.

That's from Milton Friedman.

It was a basic tenant of most libertarian thought for decades, and many repeated it. The meaning of that being that the welfare state must first be eliminated before immigration could be opened up more.

But what we have today blows that entire premise out of the water. What we have now is in no way a natural movement of people. Welfare or no, they are being herded into the US like a zombie horde from The Walking Dead, by actors and operatives with malintent.
 
As am I, always.

While Massie's 1% cut was written into law, and signed by Biden, it only takes effect in the event of a standard CR. So far, TPTB (including Speaker Johnson), have avoided that law by dong "short term" CRs. And they will be more than happy to do 3 month CRs until hell freezes over, or until they pass a new law (budget, CR, Omnibus) that over-rides existing law which dictates 1% for an actual longer term CR.

My skepticism based on the reality on Twitter:


https://twitter.com/USAB4L/status/1750616677698687226

What you said, in your tweet. Their goal is destruction and they're pissed to have the process derailed. They'll do whatever they can get away with and pull money from wherever they have to. That's makes what's going on in Texas all the more important. It's not just about the border. It's bigger than that.
 
What you said, in your tweet. Their goal is destruction and they're pissed to have the process derailed. They'll do whatever they can get away with and pull money from wherever they have to. That's makes what's going on in Texas all the more important. It's not just about the border. It's bigger than that.

I doubt very much their process is or will be "derailed". There will be more security apparatus than you can think of when all is said and done. As I have suggested, the only way out of this mess it to stop the incentives and stop the funding of the complexes involved.
 
I don't see DC winning the shoving-match here. Have you looked at a map of the Texas border? Except for right around Neuvo Laredo and a couple other smaller towns, there is nothing out there. It's over 1,200 miles long. The very same factors (remoteness, length of the border, etc.) that permit the Cabal to play these stupid demographic-warfare games, will permit long, drawn-out civil disobedience by patriotic Americans who are fed up with DC's bull$#@!. So, if they want to play clown-games, there are plenty of us who are ready to strap-up and get clown-y. Sure, the US government always has the power to deploy the military in principle, but the political cost of that is very, very high, so even the maniacs operating the Resident Biden-puppet will be hesitant to flip that particular power-lever. In short, they will have no choice but to dance, and two can dance this particular Tango...

LMAO about the people on the street "doing the vaccine"!

I don't put anything past the bunch of traitors in DC and that includes switching to flying a non stream of jumbo jets straight into the country or putting the migrants and boats like they do it the Mediterranean. Then the governors and those helping are going to need ships and boats and to interdict them. Can't be stopped if flown in.
 
Thanks for that. I'd been thinking about that video but had failed to favorite it.

YT had being removing if not ranking down most videos like this.
Including ones of Hillary saying how she knows certain ways in Pakistan with Jihadists cant find that one anymore...


YT even removed some footage's/videos of Jihadists during the Bosnian conflict which is amusing.
 
I have considered that, but even if everything becomes sealed shut, the .gov, ngo's and complexes will utilize whatever other tactics in order to increase their profit margins. I don't see the problem going away at all until the people put pressure on their reps to put an end to the incentives and demand an end to the Constitution-Free-Zone. In fact, I do foresee even more violations of our rights if everything does get sealed shut, to the likes we haven't seen. At that point it will be irreversible like every other government program. Meanwhile, I am not willing to give up any of my rights, not for security, not for anything - I'll be the lone-man standing.

Back when that shithead Bush 43 was in office, border walls was a topic and I didn't like it then because walls work both ways. I do want border control but without walls.
 
Back
Top