Feds warn Texas not to enforce state-level immigration bill

Philhelm said:
Swimmingly...except for the ones that drowned.
Click to expand...

But, you can't save them from drowning if they cross at legitimate point of entry. You have to keep encouraging them to swim across the river, so you can save them from drowning. Come on man, we need to make this administration look good, and we're not using these migrants to their full potential.
 
Last edited:
PAF said:
Unfettered? Uncontrolled? You crack me up :tears:
Click to expand...

Yes.

Wide open, come one, come all, invasion.

Like most 'Merikans, perhaps a result of Common-Core education, where 2+2=5, what we have is closer to a closed border, certainly not open. How's that working out for me? If that is what 'Merikan's really, really want, who am I to argue with democratic rule by mob?
Click to expand...

The SCOTUS just ruled that Texas may NOT place obstructions on the border, that they may NOT restrict invaders progress over the border.

The Feds are now free to continue to tear those obstructions down and allow the unfettered crossing of millions of invaders from all around the world.

All we are doing is demanding that the government follow Article four Section four of the Constitution.

And nobody, not the courts, or the congress, or the president or the federal apparatus will do so.

Look, I understand you hate this country and everybody in it, for reasons you've made perfectly clear.

I do not, in spite of all my rage.

I'm not, after careful consideration, prepared to blow it all to hell to make a political point.
 
https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1749622740007502285
FF5ewFw.png


Anti Federalist said:
Prediction: Abbot will crimp and fold faster than a Chinese laundry.
Click to expand...

Whatever this is supposed to mean:
It's in politican-ese, so it means different things depending on how you graph the verb phrases.

On the one hand, it could mean:

I will continue to[:] (1) defend Texas' constitutional authority to secure the border and (2) prevent the Biden Admin from destroying our property.
​

On the other hand, it could mean:

I will continue to defend Texas' constitutional authority to[:] (1) secure the border and (2) prevent the Biden Admin from destroying our property.
​
 
Last edited:
Occam's Banana said:
https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1749622740007502285
FF5ewFw.png




Whatever this is supposed to mean:
It's in politican-ese, so it means different things depending on how you graph the verb phrases.

On the one hand, it could mean:

I will continue to[:] (1) defend Texas' constitutional authority to secure the border and (2) prevent the Biden Admin from destroying our property.
​

On the other hand, it could mean:

I will continue to defend Texas' constitutional authority to[:] (1) secure the border and (2) prevent the Biden Admin from destroying our property.
​
Click to expand...

That is, frankly, more than I expected.

<<<insert joker eating popcorn here>>>
 
The state made the claim that this was violation of state tort law:

This case concerns Texas’s attempts to invoke its state tort
law to enjoin federally authorized activities of Border Patrol
agents at the border along a 29-mile stretch of the Rio Grande.
Texas sued the United States, claiming that federal Border Patrol
agents in Eagle Pass were committing conversion and trespass to
chattels under Texas law,
Click to expand...

The SCROTUS agreed with the Feds and claimed "supremacy":

Under the Supremacy Clause, state law cannot be applied to
restrain those federal agents from carrying out their federally
authorized activities.
Click to expand...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23A607/294669/20240102145055112_23A DHS v. Texas app.pdf

Therefore, Texas should claim immunity from "Supremacy" under Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3 of the US Constitution:

GEeZOq9WcAAb2UH
 
PAF said:
Unfettered? Uncontrolled? You crack me up :tears:

Like most 'Merikans, perhaps a result of Common-Core education, where 2+2=5, what we have is closer to a closed border, certainly not open. How's that working out for me? If that is what 'Merikan's really, really want, who am I to argue with democratic rule by mob?
...
Click to expand...

What drugs are you taking?

I didn’t say anything about “open” or “closed”. But now that you mention it, it certainly seems open. It is not only open to goods, services, vacationers, travelers, etc., it is also open to immigrants from around the world.

And now it seems because of government meddling into the lives of individuals foreign AND domestic, foreigners are now being offered incentives, on the tax per dime no less, to come; they are invited.

Simply put and SOLID FACT: the more they close that border, the more taxes are raked in and redistributed.
Click to expand...

You have it completely backwards. The Biden Admin refusing to control the border leads to exactly what they want, bigger government, more dependency on the Democrat government, and more spending across the board.
 
PAF said:
Click to expand...


Who are you trying to fool? That’s typical of the mass immigration crowd to take an old show from 7 years ago, under completely different circumstances, and try to use it as proof that Ron would be on your side. Sorry, many of us watch The Liberty Report all the time, and Ron Paul is decidedly against open, unlimited immigration.
 
Thread summary: Washington DC has declared war on one of the 50 States. What should the lawful response of the other 49 States be to this implicit threat against all of them, by this alien, invading power?

image.png


The stewards in Washington, DC were charged with protecting the Union, not terrorizing the 50 States by silently declaring war on them. We live in a new digital era where we do not need big stone buildings to have a sophisticated governmental organization. The entirety of Washington, DC can be bulldozed off the Eastern seaboard into the Atlantic for all I care, as they have evinced that they are the new King George and their thugs in the three-letter agencies the new redcoats. That's not "right-wing extremism", that's 1776 and a musket-ball through the heart of every traitor to this once-great country. They've been playing this like it's a game. It's not a game and if they want to push past the limits, where there are no take-backs, that can be arranged. That's not a threat, it's simply a description of reality, of which they are living in denial. F-15s and nukes aside, they are not the stronger party in the battle which they are positioning themselves to enter. We The People will bulldoze that god-forsaken swamp, sow it with salt and pave it over if they imagine they can resurrect the tyranny of ol' Georgie-boy. We can reconstitute a new federal government in a hot-minute...
 
Last edited:
Brian4Liberty said:
What drugs are you taking?
Click to expand...

Clean as a whistle. What I have to deal with on a day-to-day are brain-washed/brain-dead people who have been conditioned by government. Which is why this problem continues to persist.


I didn’t say anything about “open” or “closed”. But now that you mention it, it certainly seems open. It is not only open to goods, services, vacationers, travelers, etc., it is also open to immigrants from around the world.
Click to expand...

All borders should be open to goods, services, vacationers, travelers, etc. It is not the place of government to restrict/regulate/approve/disapprove who I can associate with.

You have it backwards. The Biden Admin refusing to control the border leads to exactly what they want, bigger government, more dependency on the Democrat government, and more spending across the board.
Click to expand...

No, sir. It is you and indoctrinated 'Merikan's who have been obediently conditioned by government who have it completely backwards. The more border "security" who directs those immigrants, the more that Wall goes up [to create more entry/exit points], the more those immigrants are processed into the system. Those who are processed obtain government-issued-cards, pay taxes when they work which helps Grow the Fed, restricts who private employers are "allowed" to hire by government dictate, increases the profits of the Security Industrial Complexes, and enables them access to government programs, while shredding our very BoR's on the tax payer dime.

The only proper solution is to allow people to freely go about their business [unless a crime a has been committed and faces their accuser], and not force them to obtain "legal" government issued cards.

And you seriously want Biden/Trump/Government/etc. to have more control? This is the twilight zone that I can't figure out, especially among "let's pretend we are libertarians/conservatives".

Controlling other peoples lives at the hand of government is in fact what you and others have fought so hard for. You helped make the bed. Now sleep in it.

If it was up to me? Let people come and go freely, work and spend if they wish - no "legal" government-issued-indoctrination-cards needed. This way they can't Grow the Fed, Vote, or Draw from the System. And if they can't make it on their own, there are others places they can freely go.
 
PAF said:
All borders should be open to goods, services, vacationers, travelers, etc. It is not the place of government to restrict/regulate/approve/disapprove who I can associate with.
Click to expand...

Maybe they don't want to associate with you. Maybe they'd rather associate with the government that gives them I.D. cards, work permits, free housing, etc.

I mean, if I were the government, I'd be more interested in getting their support than yours. You're a very hard voter (I mean, non-voter) to please.
 
WarriorLiberty said:
Why doesn't Texas Bus those migrants to Washington DC like the other state had done? if Washington DC truly feels strongly in their "Open Border agenda" as much they should practice what they preach...
Click to expand...

Way to go, I am totally on board!!! We need to raise even more taxes not only to transport them, but provide first class seats!!!

/s
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
Militarized Law Enforcement Reaches a New Level under Trump
Replies
17
Views
94
Invisible Man
I
Voluntarist
US Appeals Court Rejects Trump Bid To Revoke Thousands Of Migrants' Status
Replies
1
Views
14
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
PAF
Immigration-Control Tyranny
Replies
4
Views
27
acptulsa
acptulsa
Voluntarist
Immigration Detainments That Make You Say WTF
3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
435
nikcers
nikcers
PAF
Immigration-Control Tyranny
Replies
11
Views
53
acptulsa
acptulsa
Back
Top