Since she hasn't responded to that specific question yet, I feel comfortable responding for her. No, you are wrong, that is not what she believes. At all. I don't know where in the article you read, "EVERYBODY WHO DISAGREES WITH YOU ON THE INTERNET IS A GOVERNMENT PAID TROLL."
The entire point of government paid troll is to get more real people on their side. So it makes sense that they would have some non-government paid people agreeing with and promoting their views.
So what is the real lesson here?
Don't find yourself agreeing with government paid trolls!!!
"The entire point of government paid troll is to get more real people on their side."
I don't know about this. "Government paid trolls" might be interested in getting real people on their side. Sometimes, maybe.
But there are some other things that "Government paid trolls" might do.
Infiltrating organizations and getting people demoralized about the mission.
And getting people motivated to do pointless and harmful things.
Now that I've seen that the National Committeeman that the Ron Paul people voted for, that I voted for, in Maine last May, used to work for INSCOM and the NSA, I now suspect that many of the crazy BS ideas that I saw repeated so often here on ronpaulforums since 2007 aren't naturally occurring in any sense. They're elaborate tricks being pulled by people who have no interest in helping Ron Paul at all, but only of harming Ron Paul. I'm not arguing that everyone who adopts the ideas of the paid tricksters are paid tricksters. The paid tricksters have loud voices, and are persistent. It is not a shock that people buy in at times, and parrot the paid tricksters lines.
Arguably, this problem being discussed here is the central problem we have.
How can we fight this?
Where can I find an article somewhere? Something definitive. That says something like: "Goverment spies often develop plans to infiltrate and disrupt organizations, including political campaigns. Here is what they typically try to accomplish. Here are many examples of this happening in the past. Here is how this serious problem is effectively fought."
We need this. We all need to know this. When the Ron Paul campaign in Maine is electing as National Committeeman (Mark Willis) someone who worked for INSCOM as a liason between INSCOM and the NSA, something is seriously wrong with our abilities to root out those who aren't interested in helping, in following the plan, but in disrupting the plan.
I want that link to that article that helps us fight against the Government paid trolls who are trying to disrupt our plans. Strangely enough, Wikipedia does a pretty good job of that.
INSCOM also has significant responsibilities in counterintelligence, force protection, electronic warfare, and information warfare.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army_Intelligence_and_Security_Command
INSCOM was Mark Willis's employer for 10 years.
What exactly is "information warfare"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_warfare
"Information warfare may involve collection of tactical information, assurance(s) that one's own information is valid, spreading of propaganda or disinformation to demoralize or manipulate[1] the enemy and the public, undermining the quality of opposing force information and denial of information-collection opportunities to opposing forces."
Spreading of propaganda or disinformation? Isn't that what Government Paid Trolls do?
I'm really pissed off about all this. It's one thing to recognize that we aren't going to win many battles right now because enough people aren't on our side right now. It's another thing to recognize that the Government is taking our tax dollars and paying people to disrupt our plans to get people on our side. Really pisses me off. Goverment vs People.
I do not like when the Government fks with people.