FBI 'raided' Mar-a-Lago

[pcosmar]

There is no difference. I think both were guilty.

If so,,Why the Radically Different treatment?

 

[pcosmar]

https://www.4ashli.com/cta/
Call To Action

You may ask, “What Could I Possibly Do?” or “What Kind of Difference Could I Possibly Make?” Our first response to those questions would be – “GOOD QUESTIONS! EXCELLENT QUESTIONS!!” The next response would be, “There are so many things that ANYONE can do, and MUST DO!” if TRUTH and JUSTICE are to win. This is precisely the reason for the #4Ashli Movement!

More importantly, as each of these items have the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and DUE PROCESS at its core – these are action items that affect each and every single American Citizen regardless of whether they are involved or affected by the events of January 6, 2021. On behalf of Micki Willhoeft, CAPP (Citizens Against Political Persecution, INC) and A4Justice (Americans for Justice, INC) we would like to say Thank You for doing your part to help keep the spirit of Ashli Babbitt alive! It is through this effort, that the sacrifice made by Ashli Babbitt and others on January 6th will continue to make a difference in saving our nation. Thank You!!

 

[Anti Federalist]

Can badge number [MENTION=32418]69360[/MENTION] or [MENTION=41772]Sonny Tufts[/MENTION] explain to me, without bogging their response down with how Trump is a special case or what-about-ing me, why HRC got a pass and Trump got swatted? Because I'd genuinely like to know what the difference is...

This is a rhetorical question, correct?

 

[pcosmar]

He removed classified documents. He violated the espionage act.

Those are the Documents that the DOJ had sealed in that room weeks before. all known and accounted for.

Drop the bullshit and at least pretend to be an American.

https://www.4ashli.com/

 

[acptulsa]

This is a rhetorical question, correct?

It's certainly being ducked like one. But it's a fair question.

I'm inclined to theorize that the political science majors figure communists are afraid to fight unless they have Authoritay behind them, and both fascists and freedom lovers are more likely to fight when they are being persecuted. So, if they want us to fight each other instead of them, they'll cozy up to the useful idiots (makes it easier to get them to swallow their Jonestown Cult Kool-Aid) and make a big show of dissing whomever they can get the right wing to adopt as a figurehead.

 

[donnay]

It's certainly being ducked like one. But it's a fair question.

I'm inclined to theorize that the political science majors figure communists are afraid to fight unless they have Authoritay behind them, and both fascists and freedom lovers are more likely to fight when they are being persecuted. So, if they want us to fight each other instead of them, they'll cozy up to the useful idiots (makes it easier to get them to swallow their Jonestown Cult Kool-Aid) and make a big show of dissing whomever they can get the right wing to adopt as a figurehead.

And you think Alex Jones is a conspiracy theorists, too. Uh huh.

 

[acptulsa]

And you think Alex Jones is a conspiracy theorists, too. Uh huh.

Isn't he?

 

[donnay]

Isn't he?

You think he is and that is okay by me, I am just wondering why you think Alex Jones is a nut for doing the same?

 

[A Son of Liberty]

This is a rhetorical question, correct?

No. I'd genuinely like for folks such as 69360 and Sonny Tufts to give their explanation as to why these two seemingly very similar cases are being treated so dissimilarly.

You and I know, of course, why they're being treated so differently. But I'd like for them to give their explanation. That's not rhetorical. I want an answer.

 

[A Son of Liberty]

So, if they want us to fight each other instead of them, they'll cozy up to the useful idiots

Yes. So, in effect, "they" are "them". It makes no significant difference.

 

[acptulsa]

You think he is and that is okay by me, I am just wondering why you think Alex Jones is a nut for doing the same?

I don't. What makes you think I do?

Hell, at least he parlays that into a mighty good living selling dick pills. That's more than I can say.

I think I get closer to the truth than he does. But he laughs at me all the way to the bank.

 

[donnay]

I don't. What makes you think I do?

Hell, at least he parlays that into a mighty good living selling dick pills. That's more than I can say.

I think I get closer to the truth than he does. But he laughs at me all the way to the bank.

Okay, so you don't like that he is a capitalists who funds his own show and staff and doesn't get millions of dollars, funded by Big pHARMa and other corporations sponsors?

 

[acptulsa]

Okay, so you don't like that he is a capitalists who funds his own show and staff and doesn't get millions of dollars, funded by Big pHARMa and other corporations sponsors?

Don't put words in my mouth. Most people have noticed I really don't like that by now.

What do I dislike about Alex Jones? Is that how that question would look, if you were actually asking instead of trying to play silly-assed gotcha games? The so-called music. His gravelly voice. The screaming rants. The way he repeats himself, stretching ten minutes' worth of content into an hour or two by repeating 90% of the previous segment before producing one new crumb between each pair of dick pills commercials. The way he congratulates himself for breaking news we've been talking about for a week or two.

That enough? Or do you still feel the need to make stupid shit up?

 

[69360]

If so,,Why the Radically Different treatment?

IIRC Clinton gave up the material when asked. I could be remembering wrong. They declined to prosecute her. Trump wouldn't have been raided if he did the same.

If Clinton got a pass Trumo should as well. But they may nail him on this to prevent him from running again.

 

[pcosmar]

IIRC Clinton gave up the material when asked. I could be remembering wrong.

lol
WAY WRONG.

Clinton Blamed Trump.

and Russians

and killed anyone else.

 

[acptulsa]

State Department officials contacted Clinton in the summer of 2014 after they discovered they did not have access to many of her emails. State Department spokesman John Kirby said, "In the process of responding to congressional document requests pertaining to Benghazi, State Department officials recognized that it had access to relatively few email records from former Secretary Clinton. State Department officials contacted her representatives during the summer of 2014 to learn more about her email use and the status of emails in that account.”[42] In October 2014, the State Department requested the work-related emails of Clinton and other former secretaries of state after the State Department noted it also "did not have extensive email records from prior Secretaries of State."[42]

The following month, the House Select Committee on Benghazi requested access to Clinton's emails regarding the 2012 attack in Benghazi. Clinton provided 300 emails. An additional set of emails, produced from other officials' email accounts, had been provided to the committee in August 2014 by the State Department.[1] On December 5, 2014, Clinton released 30,490 printed emails to the State Department. Another 31,830 emails were determined to be private and not released.[1]

Nearly three months later, on March 2, 2015, Michael Schmidt of The New York Times reported that Clinton "exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state...and may have violated federal requirements that officials’ correspondence be retained as part of the agency’s record."[43]

https://ballotpedia.org/Hillary_Clinton_email_investigation

Did they ever get more than half the information they "demanded"?

And did they get more than about 1% from Clinton, or did they get over 90% of it forensically?

 

[Brian4Liberty]

IIRC Clinton gave up the material when asked. I could be remembering wrong.
...

Yeah, you are remembering wrong. You must have forgotten the little details like internet connected servers in bathrooms full of sensitive, classified and secret documents and communications, that Hillary was doing in total violation of policy and law. You must have forgotten the drives being wiped, and phones being broken apart with hammers after they were subpoenaed. You must have forgotten the server that spied on Congress for the Hillary campaign via Wasserman-Schultz and the Awan brothers, which disappeared and was replaced with a fake server after being subpoenaed.

Yep, everything was exactly the same.


Edit: “You must have forgotten the server that spied on Congress for the Hillary campaign via Wasserman-Schultz and the Awan brothers, which disappeared and was replaced with a fake server after being subpoenaed.” And it shouldn’t be ignored that the data was being shared with Pakistan, and from there likely distributed to the world (for a price).

 

[acptulsa]

Yep, everything was exactly the same.

1. Set up a double standard.

2. Rub our noses in it.

The closest thing to a funny part this has is the fact that the useful idiots feel certain that they are animals more equal than Trump. Even as they die from their Jonestown Cult Kool Aid shots.

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Sonny Tufts]

Can badge number [MENTION=32418]69360[/MENTION] or [MENTION=41772]Sonny Tufts[/MENTION] explain to me, without bogging their response down with how Trump is a special case or what-about-ing me, why HRC got a pass and Trump got swatted? Because I'd genuinely like to know what the difference is...

My guess is that the DOJ didn't have the guts to go after HRC. In addition, did any of HRC's emails have the ultra-high security classification that some of Trump's records did?

Keep in mind that all that's happened to Trump so far is the execution of a search warrant. He hasn't been charged with, much less convicted of, anything.