Faux News poll - Trump opens his primary lead another 7 points, close to 70 percent

[Anti Federalist]

Exactly my point. They have Trump as their ostensible, trumped-up target, and people want to beat them. I don't even think people believe the old fart will deliver them from the clutches of anyone or anything. I think they're voting for him for the same reason the anti-abortion crowd voted for H.W. in '92, after he said that he wanted Jenna Bush to be able to have all the abortions she wants. They know they won't get what they want and need, but they intend to send a message. It's basically that last act of defiance.

But Trump delivered.

He placed justices on SCOTUS that provided a majority that DID overturn Roe after years of RINO talk and bullshit in a bag.

On oilfield regulations he delivered, at least for me and people in my line of work at the time.

From an anti war perspective we were certainly ahead of the game then as opposed to now and there's no denying that.

That's some of the big ones.

And he managed that with a treacherous congress, an establishment full of hostile traitors and Quislings, a Marxist media establishment raging against him every every single day, weaponized prosecutors, intelligence agents, law enforcement and a Marxist education establishment.

 

[acptulsa]

Delivered the death jab, too.

I'm not feeling the faith from people who thought he was the cat's whiskers in '16. Not any more. I'm just getting this:

 

[Philhelm]

But Trump delivered.

He placed justices on SCOTUS that provided a majority to DID overturn Roe.

On oilfield regulations he delivered, at least for me and people in my line of work at the time.

From an anti war perspective we were certainly ahead of the game then as opposed to now and there's no denying that.

That's some of the big ones.

And he managed that with a treacherous congress, an establishment full of hostile traitors and Quislings, a Marxist media establishment raging against him every every single day, weaponized prosecutors, intelligence agents, law enforcement and a Marxist education establishment.

I doubled my salary during the Trump years. Also, his one-man war against the media was probably worth the price of admission; that is a fight that has been long overdue. As I see it, my options are (A) Trump, who throws me a bone on occasion, isn't hell bent on my destruction, and who probably has an axe to grind against common enemies, (B) some milquetoast, no-name Libertarian who won't win anyway, and who would be too stuck on the ideology to do the right thing for the American people (unrestricted immigration, for example), or (C) Satan's demonic legion that was summoned to the material plane to kill me.

 

[acptulsa]

As I see it, my options are...

Yeah, yeah. No options. Ride those lesser evils straight to hell.

Don't look now, but Trump grows more milquetoast every day. DeSantis, meanwhile, seems to have figured out that he has nothing to lose by acknowledging reality (with a little help from a friend). He's a Republican and a respected sitting governor. How is he not an option? Consensus, that's how. Herd mentality. Can't get a stampede going for him.

Moo.

https://twitter.com/SallyMayweather/status/1736470178576179403

 

[Anti Federalist]

Delivered the death jab, too.

I'm not feeling the faith from people who thought he was the cat's whiskers in '16. Not any more. I'm just getting this:

Yes he did, to his eternal shame.

There's no spin around that.

He fell for what assholes like Fauci were selling, hook, line and sinker.

That is my biggest complaint: he is supposed to be Mr. Mega-Tycoon, master of business, a man who surrounds himself with the best and brightest.

The reality is he cannot manage and control his team and the people in it, for shit.

I can and have done a much better job.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I doubled my salary during the Trump years. Also, his one-man war against the media was probably worth the price of admission; that is a fight that has been long overdue. As I see it, my options are (A) Trump, who throws me a bone on occasion, isn't hell bent on my destruction, and who probably has an axe to grind against common enemies, (B) some milquetoast, no-name Libertarian who won't win anyway, and who would be too stuck on the ideology to do the right thing for the American people (unrestricted immigration, for example), or (C) Satan's demonic legion that was summoned to the material plane to kill me.

Yes, exactly this too.

+rep

Even with the death jab taken into account, he's not actively looking to evaporate me, like the demonic legions you just spoke of are.

They are using the language of genocide against us, and are working up momentum.

 

[dannno]

Delivered the death jab, too.

Did you get it?

 

[acptulsa]

Did you get it?

No, but I used to know people who did, before I could talk to them. And I don't care how caveat emptor anyone thinks I should be to call myself libertarian, I'm still pissed. I have a right to be. I'm not lowering my standards to, didn't force me is good enough to be the lesser fucking evil. Especially since for all I know, the only reason he didn't is it wasn't ready yet. Fact of the matter is, it's a stupid question because only Biden could possibly have presided over such a mandate, and he didn't.

Do you think Fauci, the eugenicist behind the creation of AIDS, is one of "the best people"? I answered your question, are you going to answer mine?

 

[dannno]

Do you think Fauci, the eugenicist behind the creation of AIDS, is one of "the best people"? I answered your question, are you going to answer mine?

Lol, no of course not.

I think Trump's positions on Covid were right in a lot of cases, he was saying a lot of the right things when it was happening. That's why the media was pissed at him. He told the entire world the cure for covid right off the bat, and only a few people listened because the media lied about it. The people who promoted the cure and got kicked off social media.

He also said a lot of dumb things, which he either said to placate the media, placate the voters who disagreed with him to get re-elected, or may have actually believed some of the dumb things he said - to an extent. Or he could have pretended he believed them because he had the cover of "the experts".

Nobody really knows except for Trump. But I do believe he knew he had to get re-elected to save the country, I do believe he wants to save the country and I believe he will lie to placate a brainwashed populace in order to help save the country.

I don't think Trump can save the country on his own, but I do think he is a good first step. Then maybe someone like Ramaswamy, and eventually Rand.

 

[Anti Globalist]

Yet he's still going to lose next November.

 

[nobody's_hero]

Yeah, yeah. No options. Ride those lesser evils straight to hell.

Don't look now, but Trump grows more milquetoast every day. DeSantis, meanwhile, seems to have figured out that he has nothing to lose by acknowledging reality (with a little help from a friend). He's a Republican and a respected sitting governor. How is he not an option? Consensus, that's how. Herd mentality. Can't get a stampede going for him.

Moo.

https://twitter.com/SallyMayweather/status/1736470178576179403

I think it's moreso that voting for anyone other than Trump sends a message that they 'got away' with 2020. They might do that anyway. Maybe they already have. I mean, I like DeSantis, but DeSantis didn't have an election stolen from him in 2020. (Although honestly, since the very first debate, Ron's kind of had this vibe like he doesn't really want to be president, which sort of gives credence to the claims that he was 'recruited')

I'm not saying that's a good reason to vote for Trump, but it is *a* reason, and I think it still doesn't sit well with a lot of people that TPTB can stuff ballot boxes and try cases in front of biased judges, and then hopes everyone will 'move on'. Those voters haven't just . . . gone away. They can't. What we've witnessed up to, and since, the 2020 election has been an outright sham, except only in the eyes of those who are hopelessly afflicted with TDS.

There's only one candidate these people could vote for that could potentially give the satisfaction of payback, even if it's mostly symbolic.

 

[acptulsa]

(Although honestly, since the very first debate, Ron's kind of had this vibe like he doesn't really want to be president, which sort of gives credence to the claims that he was 'recruited')

Ron Paul was recruited. By us. I know not really wanting a job that every little boy aspires to is a turnoff for most voters. But I'm with Douglas Adams on this one. Give it to the person who wants it least. He'll try to do what he does do well, and he'll try to do as little as possible.

There's only one candidate these people could vote for that could potentially give the satisfaction of payback, even if it's mostly symbolic.

Hell of a thing to base a psyop on. Just as long as we don't appoint him for life after we kill all the teal-haired poll workers, then I guess we'll be able to say we could have done ourselves more harm. But I think he's scheduled to be crowned Big Brother.

 

[nobody's_hero]

Hell of a thing to base a psyop on. Just as long as we don't appoint him for life after we kill all the teal-haired poll workers, then I guess we'll be able to say we could have done ourselves more harm. But I think he's scheduled to be crowned Big Brother.

What.

You lost me.

I get that you think it's all an extremely elaborate reverse-uno-skip-flip play by the elites. (I'm not looking to rehash that debate here—my views haven't changed, and neither have yours)

'Killing teal-haired poll workers' and 'appointing Trump for life' are new ones though. Unless I'm just wildly misinterpreting your comment, you're slipping to the level of MSM fear-porn.

 

[asurfaholic]

What.

You lost me.

I get that you think it's all an extremely elaborate reverse-uno-skip-flip play by the elites. (I'm not looking to rehash that debate here—my views haven't changed, and neither have yours)

'Killing teal-haired poll workers' and 'appointing Trump for life' are new ones though. Unless I'm just wildly misinterpreting your comment, you're slipping to the level of MSM fear-porn.

It doesnt make any sense. Trump is being hit from all angles by a weaponized DOJ and the cult leftist media- and somehow he is supposed to be be the evil one actually?

I used to think trump was a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Didn’t like him from the time he ran in the primary while Ron Paul was running, didn’t like him before he won his election, or after. But something is ringing too true to me that he is fighting to keep America safe from the very powers who are clobbering him right as we speak. As someone who has been through the court system, he is not fighting an easy fight at all. And that’s just one of the many tentacles of the monster.

 

[acptulsa]

'Killing teal-haired poll workers' and 'appointing Trump for life' are new ones though. Unless I'm just wildly misinterpreting your comment, you're slipping to the level of MSM fear-porn.

How do dictatorships typically happen, historically? I'm not privy to the details, but I doubt they'll be all that inventive. No doubt it'll be a script we've seen before. The CIA has been practicing setting up puppet dictatorships since before we were born.

 

[Snowball]

The only way Trump has a shot to come close and potentially win is if Biden is the Democratic candidate.

 

[CaptUSA]

The only way Trump has a shot to come close and potentially win is if Biden is the Democratic candidate.

I REALLY doubt Biden will end up being the candidate...

But regardless, I don't think Trump has a chance unless they change back all the loosened voting rules and lock down all the ballots. In other words, he doesn't have a chance.

 

[Snowball]

I REALLY doubt Biden will end up being the candidate...

But regardless, I don't think Trump has a chance unless they change back all the loosened voting rules and lock down all the ballots. In other words, he doesn't have a chance.

Consider this. States run elections. Democrats have exactly 270 EC votes in their Democratically-controlled states and DC. I'm not counting Louisiana and Kentucky because even though they have a Democrat governor, there is no chance they won't vote Republican. All others add to exactly 270. So, if just ONE falls out of line, Democrats cannot hit the total. Michigan is a prospect due to Israel and its high Muslim population. Another is Maine, and another is Arizona where Katie Hobbs is so fed up with Biden that she's sending her National Guard to the border. Kansas, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania are possibles too.
There is a solid path for Trump over Biden, additionally RFK Jr and Cornel West and Jill Stein (Green) will siphon off the liberal vote.

But if the Democrats run a more popular, sensible and charismatic candidate who isn't afraid to talk about Biden's failings, they will beat Trump. It has to be the right candidate.

 

[CaptUSA]

Consider this. States run elections. Democrats have exactly 270 EC votes in their Democratically-controlled states and DC. I'm not counting Louisiana and Kentucky because even though they have a Democrat governor, there is no chance they won't vote Republican. All others add to exactly 270. So, if just ONE falls out of line, Democrats cannot hit the total. Michigan is a prospect due to Israel and its high Muslim population. Another is Maine, and another is Arizona where Katie Hobbs is so fed up with Biden that she's sending her National Guard to the border. Kansas, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania are possibles too.
There is a solid path for Trump over Biden, additionally RFK Jr and Cornel West and Jill Stein (Green) will siphon off the liberal vote.

But if the Democrats run a more popular, sensible and charismatic candidate who isn't afraid to talk about Biden's failings, they will beat Trump. It has to be the right candidate.

Seems like you're still thinking that the voters decide the outcomes. I think the voting processes decide the outcomes. Trump may win states with a tight voting process, but he'll lose the others just like last time.

 

[Snowball]

Seems like you're still thinking that the voters decide the outcomes. I think the voting processes decide the outcomes. Trump may win states with a tight voting process, but he'll lose the others just like last time.

I'm not doing that at all. I'm saying that even if Dems rig their states, they have no room for error.
If the Republican governors and secretaries of state are also going to rig against Trump, then it's fait accompli.