Fantastic! Giuliani strikes back... update on Reuters story

Giuliani is dumber than I originally thought. He's not going to be happy till he alienates all his supporters.

His only supporters now are republicrat neocons. The "Christian right", and any other independent thinker, or strict conservative voter will not be taking guiliani seriously anymore.
 
Rudy is nibbling at the bait. All we need to do now is show enough weakness to lure him into a televised debate. Go to debateronpaul.com and sign the petition. Rudy reminds me of Elmer Fudd. I'm gonna get terrorists. Shhh.. be verrry quiet, I'm hunting terowist. Loook! Terowist twacks, twapped in their own twacks. hahahahahaha............. Someone needs to do a cartoon......hahaha
 
Christian Right

Christians who support Ron Paul need to wake up fellow Christians to what GB's real motives are. I was fooled too. We need to humble ourselves and admitt it.
 
His only supporters now are republicrat neocons. The "Christian right", and any other independent thinker, or strict conservative voter will not be taking guiliani seriously anymore.

I'm just glad it's coming to light. The media and periodicals seemed to glorify Guiliani as their little poster boy. It was very sickening to me. I am very happy with the way things are going. I'm sick of all the fear-mongering. The GoP party has been trying to terrify the people for way too long. This invisible terrorist propaganda has to stop. For a while I was wondering if anyone had learned anything from the McCarthy era.
 
Giuliani meant that he's been studying how to create an Islamic terrorist since the '70s.

As I've said...Giuliani knows Ron is right, but he also knows that Americans haven't a clue.

He also has DCI ad people telling him to just keep repeating the one-liner..."It's absurd to say that Americans invited the attacks."

Ron should create his own one-liner and just keep repeating that to Rudy.

"Mr. Giuliani...Reading Is Fundamental."

Bosso
 
That is such a LAME comeback. Completely dodges the question of cause and twists it into a question of dealing with the affect.

First a straw man ("invited the attack"). Now a non-sequitur. Hopefully before this is over Guillani's camp (double entendre) will run through every fallacy in the book.
 
First a straw man ("invited the attack"). Now a non-sequitur. Hopefully before this is over Guillani's camp (double entendre) will run through every fallacy in the book.
I love it- best one line summary. Hope to see more posts from you.
 
Back
Top