Facebook Follows YouTube's Lead, Blocks Alex Jones' Pages

To be fair to Alex Jones, he has called for a war on North Korea thinking we needed to attack to prevent them from nuking the US.

So what? Politicians call for wars all the time and I don't see any of them banned.
 
I read your post and I did not see any pressure exerted on those social media platforms to ban infowars. One solitary congressman just asked why they let em continue to broadcast of facebook. That is it.

Wow. You really have a closed mind. I don't like Alex Jones either and my first reaction was to call BS. But then I watched the video and realized I was wrong. And it was more than one guy. How can you watch that video and say they weren't threatening Facebook.


I refuse to believe that some no name congressman has more pull than the US president.

So it's ok if congress threatens you as long as the president doesn't? What if during Obama's administration congress made the chairman of the NCAAP appear before them and asked them why they still had misleading statistics on their website? Would you be ok with that since it wasn't Obama doing it?
 
So what? Politicians call for wars all the time and I don't see any of them banned.

The point is that Tom Woods got it wrong, the man just like many partisan neocons will always imperialist war given the right president and sitiation
 
So true.

 


Alex Jones just got decapitated by Apple and other platforms, so I spend some time in today's episode unpacking what that means. I also take on left-liberals who think the problem with the Fed and the military is lack of diversity, and right-wingers who think capitalism is based on "materialism."
 


I've noticed you are really bad at watching videos, every video you comment on or post about you get it completely wrong. What's up with that?

When did Alex Jones say we should go to war with NK?

The answer is, he didn't...

He asked Ron Paul what we should do about NK, then Ron Paul said we should bring the troops home and Alex Jones said that he agreed with him. Then Alex Jones later said he agrees with Ron Paul again, then told him he was asking him questions as a "devil's advocate".

Considering how bad you are at comprehending these types of situations, you should probably just completely stop criticizing people like Alex Jones and Stef because you always come away from videos of them with some made up line of bullshit.
 
Last edited:
I've noticed you are really bad at watching videos, every video you comment on or post about you get it completely wrong. What's up with that?

When did Alex Jones say we should go to war with NK?

The answer is, he didn't...

He asked Ron Paul what we should do about NK, then Ron Paul said we should bring the troops home and Alex Jones said that he agreed with him. Then Alex Jones later said he agrees with Ron Paul again, then told him he was asking him questions as a "devil's advocate".

Considering how bad you are at comprehending these types of situations, you should probably just completely stop criticizing people like Alex Jones and Stef because you always come away from videos of them with some made up line of bull$#@!.

That is not what I heard. In the beginning you can hear Ron trying to talk out of believing the neocon solution to the problem, then u also hear Alex saying that the North koreans have hydrogen and atomic bombs and they said they would unilaterally strike the US. Now I am a peacenik as u can get, I am more peacenik than weed smoking hippie at a Woodstock concert. Now if I believe that neocon propaganda for a second, I too would be in favor of striking them before they annihilate the US

Alex Jones believe that and you sure as hell believe that he wants to prevent the annihilation of his children by striking first. I think Alex in that segment was trying to get Ron to support his neocon agenda and when he did not comply, he called back his ideas and pretend he was with Ron the whole time.
 
That is not what I heard. In the beginning you can hear Ron trying to talk out of believing the neocon solution to the problem, then u also hear Alex saying that the North koreans have hydrogen and atomic bombs and they said they would unilaterally strike the US. Now I am a peacenik as u can get, I am more peacenik than weed smoking hippie at a Woodstock concert. Now if I believe that neocon propaganda for a second, I too would be in favor of striking them before they annihilate the US

Alex Jones believe that and you sure as hell believe that he wants to prevent the annihilation of his children by striking first. I think Alex in that segment was trying to get Ron to support his neocon agenda and when he did not comply, he called back his ideas and pretend he was with Ron the whole time.

Well I just hope whoever reads your posts also reads my posts, because your posts are total crap and full of misinformation.

You didn't hear Alex Jones say he agreed with Ron Paul TWICE after he answered the questions???

Have you ever heard an interviewer ask a question with a premise they didn't agree with for the sake of playing devil's advocate?

Did you not hear Alex Jones specifically use the phrase "devil's advocate" before talking about hydrogen bombs and stuff?

It's really important when critiquing people's viewpoints to be able to pickup on these nuances. You can't. So you probably should do less critiquing and more listening. I would recommend listening to Stef videos for 2 weeks straight.
 
Last edited:
I see what u say but I don't see why the social media would want to pressure govt to ban him. If anything, they would prefer to hide any govt involvement in the ban. People would start crying free speech if such info was to be released.

Either way, I hope this ban would be a win if only it keep Dr. Ron Paul away from that disinfo agent's show. #winning

Cutting down on the number of people who are exposed to Ron's ideas is "winning"?
 
I see what u say but I don't see why the social media would want to pressure govt to ban him. If anything, they would prefer to hide any govt involvement in the ban. People would start crying free speech if such info was to be released.

They are mostly hiding government involvement in the ban and you are helping them.
 
Cutting down on the number of people who are exposed to Ron's ideas is "winning"?

How good is Ron Paul's message when its sandwiched between 2 fat layers of disinfo news? I say its no good and it tarnishes the brand.

This is going to be hard for u to understand but silencing AJ is good for liberty.
 
How good is Ron Paul's message when its sandwiched between 2 fat layers of disinfo news? I say its no good and it tarnishes the brand.
It is better than if it is not heard at all even if AJ was as bad as you think.

This is going to be hard for u to understand but silencing AJ is good for liberty.
Only if it causes a big enough reaction against the censors.
 
Jones is safe on Twitter for the time being.

 
This is getting ridiculous!

 
Back
Top