juleswin
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 14,245
To be fair to Alex Jones, he has called for a war on North Korea thinking we needed to attack to prevent them from nuking the US.
To be fair to Alex Jones, he has called for a war on North Korea thinking we needed to attack to prevent them from nuking the US.
I read your post and I did not see any pressure exerted on those social media platforms to ban infowars. One solitary congressman just asked why they let em continue to broadcast of facebook. That is it.
I refuse to believe that some no name congressman has more pull than the US president.
So what? Politicians call for wars all the time and I don't see any of them banned.
To be fair to Alex Jones, he has called for a war on North Korea thinking we needed to attack to prevent them from nuking the US.
Alex Jones just got decapitated by Apple and other platforms, so I spend some time in today's episode unpacking what that means. I also take on left-liberals who think the problem with the Fed and the military is lack of diversity, and right-wingers who think capitalism is based on "materialism."
I've noticed you are really bad at watching videos, every video you comment on or post about you get it completely wrong. What's up with that?
When did Alex Jones say we should go to war with NK?
The answer is, he didn't...
He asked Ron Paul what we should do about NK, then Ron Paul said we should bring the troops home and Alex Jones said that he agreed with him. Then Alex Jones later said he agrees with Ron Paul again, then told him he was asking him questions as a "devil's advocate".
Considering how bad you are at comprehending these types of situations, you should probably just completely stop criticizing people like Alex Jones and Stef because you always come away from videos of them with some made up line of bull$#@!.
That is not what I heard. In the beginning you can hear Ron trying to talk out of believing the neocon solution to the problem, then u also hear Alex saying that the North koreans have hydrogen and atomic bombs and they said they would unilaterally strike the US. Now I am a peacenik as u can get, I am more peacenik than weed smoking hippie at a Woodstock concert. Now if I believe that neocon propaganda for a second, I too would be in favor of striking them before they annihilate the US
Alex Jones believe that and you sure as hell believe that he wants to prevent the annihilation of his children by striking first. I think Alex in that segment was trying to get Ron to support his neocon agenda and when he did not comply, he called back his ideas and pretend he was with Ron the whole time.
I agree with everything else you said but that would be cruel and unusual punishment.I would recommend listening to Stef videos for 2 weeks straight.
I see what u say but I don't see why the social media would want to pressure govt to ban him. If anything, they would prefer to hide any govt involvement in the ban. People would start crying free speech if such info was to be released.
Either way, I hope this ban would be a win if only it keep Dr. Ron Paul away from that disinfo agent's show. #winning
I see what u say but I don't see why the social media would want to pressure govt to ban him. If anything, they would prefer to hide any govt involvement in the ban. People would start crying free speech if such info was to be released.
Cutting down on the number of people who are exposed to Ron's ideas is "winning"?
It is better than if it is not heard at all even if AJ was as bad as you think.How good is Ron Paul's message when its sandwiched between 2 fat layers of disinfo news? I say its no good and it tarnishes the brand.
Only if it causes a big enough reaction against the censors.This is going to be hard for u to understand but silencing AJ is good for liberty.