WD-NY
Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2011
- Messages
- 1,787
HUNTSMAN = LAND INVASION WAR WITH IRAN
Hammer this HARD.
Jon Huntsman has the same pro-war foreign policy as Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich. Do you think he's the 'reasonable' Republican? - Reddit.com
Evidence:
Huntsman wants preemptive Iran strike
Huntsman calls nuclear Iran the ‘transcendent threat of this decade (w/ video)
Huntsman Says He’d Launch A Ground Invasion To Prevent Iran From Getting Nukes
Huntsman = More WAR. More Death. More DEBT.
Hammer this HARD.
Jon Huntsman has the same pro-war foreign policy as Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich. Do you think he's the 'reasonable' Republican? - Reddit.com
Evidence:
Huntsman wants preemptive Iran strike
“I cannot live with a nuclear-armed Iran. If you want an example of when I would use American force, it would be that,” AFP quoted Huntsman as saying on Monday, while outlining his foreign policy in an address at a university in New Hampshire.
The hawkish remarks echoed an earlier statement by Huntsman while being interviewed by New Hampshire's WMUR radio station.
Huntsman calls nuclear Iran the ‘transcendent threat of this decade (w/ video)
GOP presidential hopeful Jon Huntsman said Thursday that as president he would “see the weaponization program in Iran as probably the most challenging, transcendent threat of this decade.
Huntsman told Israeli newspaper Haaretz that he would use “all the elements of power of my country,” including military options, “to ensure that [Iran] didn’t become a nuclear power.”
Huntsman Says He’d Launch A Ground Invasion To Prevent Iran From Getting Nukes
Republican presidential hopeful Jon Huntsman is developing a track record as an outspoken Iran hawk whenever questions about Iran’s nuclear program come up. Last month, he suggested that a war with Iran was inevitable, and earlier this week, he baselessly claimed that the Iranians have “already decided” that they want nuclear weapons.But in an interview last night with CNN’s Erin Burnett, Huntsman staked out even more hawkish territory and committed to a ground invasion to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon:
Watch it:
BURNETT: Do you think at this point, unless we’re going to commit, and I’m curious whether you would commit to full on military conflict with Iran, that we have to accept that they will eventually be a nuclear power? It’s more important to figure out how to deal with that than to yell and scream about it happening when its inevitable anyway.
HUNTSMAN: Well, I think they’ve already made the decision to go nuclear. [...]
BURNETT: So, if push comes to shove and this is important, I’m not saying this is something you do tomorrow, but if push comes to shove, if what was between them and a nuclear weapon or there was an uncertainty, required troops invasion, you’d do it?
HUNTSMAN: I can’t live with the implications of not doing it. I can’t live with the thought of what a nuclear Iran brings to the region and what they said about Israel, which is our centerpiece alliance in the region. I can’t live — I can’t live with the world with a nuclear Iran.
So, then, you say, what do you do? And realistically, you got to have all options on the table. You got to be prepared to use all elements of national power.
[video=youtube;l8xEZyIBIrI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=l8xEZyIBIrI[/video]
Huntsman = More WAR. More Death. More DEBT.