Gary Johnson Explain to me Gary Johnson

Lishy

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2012
Messages
1,499
So who is this new guy? An opposing candidate of Ron Paul, or trying to pick up power through his following?

To be honest, I do not know enough about him to criticize. So explain to me his record as a politician, and any controversial views he may have.

Some people say he doesn't support the FED, others say he does.

Well he has at least spoken out against the drug war I've read on the forum, so I'm at least interested. What is the man's record and whether or not he desrves to be "Plan B"?
 
So who is this new guy? An opposing candidate of Ron Paul, or trying to pick up power through his following?

To be honest, I do not know enough about him to criticize. So explain to me his record as a politician, and any controversial views he may have.

Some people say he doesn't support the FED, others say he does.

Well he has at least spoken out against the drug war I've read on the forum, so I'm at least interested. What is the man's record and whether or not he desrves to be "Plan B"?
Gary Johnson is a little better than Obama... slightly better than Romney... and clueless as to who is behind the curtain. He is just another puppet. A third party puppet. Obama = Romney = Johnson. Choose your leader.
 
Last edited:
Gary Johnson is a little better than Obama... slightly better than Romney... and clueless as to who is behind the curtain. He is just another puppet. A third party puppet. Obama = Romney = Johnson. Choose your leader.
Explain these claims. I asked his record. You're just making claims.
 
Gary Johnson was the Governor of New Mexico I believe. He has a public record that you can review. He is against the drug war I believe and has some other libertarian views.
 
I am not familiar with MATTHEW REECE or the CHARLOTTE LIBERTARIAN EXAMINER.



ELECTIONS 2012May 5, 2012

Candidate review: Gary Johnson on the issues

Matthew Reece
Charlotte Libertarian Examiner


This is a candidate review of Gov. Gary Johnson, who is the nominee of the Libertarian Party. In this article, we will focus on his stances on important issues and whether they agree or disagree with a libertarian perspective. You can learn more about him at his campaign website, as well as from his collected statements. The libertarian perspectives come partly from the Libertarian Party platform as well as Wikipedia's articles on libertarianism.

Abortion: Gary Johnson supports a woman's right to choose up until viability of the fetus. He opposes federal funding for stem cell research. He believes the decision should be left up to the woman, not decided by governments. He believes that the Supreme Court did not have the authority to decide Roe v. Wade.

Libertarian perspective: Abortion is a divisive issue among libertarians, with pro-choice libertarians claiming that denying a woman the right to choose is an illegitimate act of aggression against her, while pro-life libertarians claim that an abortion is an illegitimate act of aggression against a fetus. Since Gary Johnson's position agrees with some libertarian positions but not others, this part of the issue is not scoreable. Johnson gets an A for believing that this is not a federal decision, however.

Budget/Economy: Gary Johnson wants to cut the federal budget by 43% to bring it into balance, and has promised to submit a balanced budget to Congress in 2013. He rejects auto and banking bailouts, state bailouts, corporate welfare, cap-and-trade, card check, and the mountain of regulation that protects special interests rather than benefiting consumers or the economy. He thinks we could have avoided a sovereign default without raising the debt ceiling in August 2011. He has said that ending the Federal Reserve is OK, but that doing so is only part of the solution. He believes that our debt is the greatest threat to our national security. He supports the passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Libertarian perspective: Libertarians support the passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes. All efforts by government to redistribute wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society.
Grade: A.

Capital punishment: Gary Johnson was once a proponent of the death penalty, but now opposes it, calling it a flawed policy. He believes that we should not risk putting innocent people to death.

Libertarian perspective: The Libertarian Party takes no formal stand on capital punishment. However, Murray Rothbard advocated capital punishment for all cases of murder, except in those cases where the victim has left a will instructing his or her heirs and assigns not to levy the death penalty on any possible murder.
Grade: A.

Drugs: Gary Johnson has called the War on Drugs a miserable failure. He believes that drug policy today parallels Prohibition in the 1920's. He advocates a harm-reduction strategy and treating drug abuse as a health issue rather than a criminal justice issue. He wants to legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana, rather than wasting money on an expensive and futile prohibition.

Libertarian perspective: Libertarians favor the repeal of all laws creating “crimes” without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes.
Grade: A.

Education: Gary Johnson wants to reduce or eliminate federal involvement in education and let states expand reforms such as vouchers and charter schools. He favors abolishing the federal Department of Education. He wants to put educational funds in the hands of the people who use it. He supports universal school choice. He believes that No Child Left Behind should be repealed. He says that there is a student loan bubble caused by federal student loan programs, and that the free market is the answer.

Libertarian perspective: Education, like any other service, is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Schools should be managed locally to achieve greater accountability and parental involvement. Recognizing that the education of children is inextricably linked to moral values, libertarians would return authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. In particular, parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children's education.
Grade: A.

Energy/Environment: Gary Johnson supports coal power and nuclear power, along with alternative energy, but opposes government subsidies for energy. He supports private sector research and development of renewable energy. He does not want to compromise on clean air, but opposes cap-and-trade and carbon taxes. He believes that current policy prevents common-sense energy development. He believes that climate change is real and man-caused.

Libertarian perspective: While energy is needed to fuel a modern society, government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. Libertarians oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation, and production. Libertarians support a clean and healthy environment and sensible use of our natural resources. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Pollution and misuse of resources cause damage to our ecosystem. Governments, unlike private businesses, are unaccountable for such damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights in resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. Libertarians realize that our planet's climate is constantly changing, but environmental advocates and social pressure are the most effective means of changing public behavior.
Grade: A.

Entitlements: Gary Johnson says that Social Security is valuable and is fixable without raising taxes. He wants Social Security to reflect today's realities without breaking trust with retirees. He supports raising the retirement age, means testing for Social Security recipients, and changing the escalator built into Social Security from the wage index to the inflation rate. He wants Congress to investigate privatizing part or all of Social Security.

Libertarian perspective: Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Libertarians would phase out the current government-sponsored Social Security system and transition to a private voluntary system.
Grade: B+.

Foreign policy: Gary Johnson initially supported the war in Afghanistan, but believes it has gone on for too long and needs to end immediately. He opposed the war in Iraq, and has said that part of the reason why Iran is a problem now is because we removed Saddam Hussein from power. He believes that America should not be borrowing money to build roads, bridges, schools and other infrastructure in foreign countries, especially when such help is currently needed at home. He believes that decades after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the deployments of American troops that remain scattered throughout Europe should be re-evaluated. He favors acting in America's self-interest while being wary of unintended consequences. He supports a 43% reduction in military spending as part of his balanced budget plan, along with a reduction in America's nuclear arsenal from 2300 weapons to 500 weapons. He believes in a non-interventionist foreign policy.

Libertarian perspective: Libertarians support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. Libertarians would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. Libertarians oppose any form of compulsory national service.
Grade: A.

Gay marriage: Gary Johnson believes that the government must be neutral on personal beliefs. He believes that government should not impose its values upon marriage. It should allow marriage equality, including gay marriage. It should also protect the rights of religious organizations to follow their beliefs.

Libertarian perspective: Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government's treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.
Grade: A.

Gun control: Gary Johnson opposes all gun control, and does not believe in limiting the types or sizes of guns that private citizens can own. He believes that the Second Amendment clearly gives citizens an individual right to bear arms.

Libertarian perspective: Libertarians affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment
to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense. Libertarians oppose all laws at any level of government requiring registration of, or restricting, the ownership, manufacture, or transfer or sale of firearms or ammunition.
Grade: A.

Healthcare: Gary Johnson believes that both Obamacare and Bush's Medicare Part D are unconstitutional. He plans to cut Medicare and Medicaid by 43% as part of his balanced budget plan. He believes that a market-based approach should be the foundation of any solution, and that a healthcare insurance system that is privately owned and managed is the best approach to solving our healthcare problems. He supports tort reform and control of frivolous lawsuits as a means of reducing costs. He does not believe that healthcare is a human right.

Libertarian perspective: Libertarians favor restoring and reviving a free market health care system. Libertarians recognize the freedom of individuals to determine the level of health insurance they want, the level of health care they want, the care providers they want, the medicines and treatments they will use and all other aspects of their medical care, including end-of-life decisions. People should be free to purchase health insurance across state lines.
Grade: A.

Homeland security: Gary Johnson believes that the PATRIOT Act should be repealed, which would restore proper judicial oversight to federal investigations and again require federal investigators to prove probable cause prior to executing a search. He favors due process at Guantanamo, with no torture of terrorist suspects. He wants to encourage airports and airlines to seek the most effective methods for screening travelers, including private sector screeners. He says that screeners outside of government can be held fully accountable for their successes and failures. He opposes CISPA. He would end the federal Department of Homeland Security.

Libertarian perspective: Libertarians support the rights recognized by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, and property. Protection from unreasonable search and seizure should include records held by third parties, such as email, medical, and library records.
Grade: A.

Immigration: Gary Johnson believes in a two part approach to immigration policy: simplify legal immigration and tackle illegal immigration. He believes it should be easier for a potential immigrant to get a work visa. Potential immigrants should pass a background check, and then be issued a Social Security card, which would allow them to pay income, payroll, and all other taxes workers pay. He thinks there should be a two-year grace period for illegal immigrants to attain work visas so they can continue contributing to America and begin taking part in American society openly. He wants immigrants with temporary work visas to have access to the normal procedures for gaining permanent status and citizenship, and to be able to bring their families to the U.S. after demonstrating the ability to support them financially. He plans to streamline the legal immigration process to reduce illegal immigration and allow the U.S. to know who enters the country and for what reasons. He would enforce a 'one strike, you're out' rule for immigrants who circumvent the streamlined work visa process. He wants to impose and enforce sanctions on employers for noncompliance with immigration laws.

Libertarian perspective: For those workers already in the United States illegally, we can avoid "amnesty" and still offer a pathway out of the underground economy. Newly legalized workers can be assessed fines and back taxes and serve probation befitting the misdemeanor they've committed. They can be required to take their place at the back of the line should they eventually apply for permanent residency.
Grade: A-.

Jobs: Gary Johnson does not believe that government can create jobs, but instead that it can foster certainty in private business, which in turn creates jobs. He opposed the NLRB's recent actions against Boeing in South Carolina. He believes that long-term unemployment benefits postpone dealing with the problem of unemployment. He opposed raising the minimum wage while he was governor of New Mexico. He believes businesses should be allowed to reward good workers and fire bad workers without intervention from labor unions. He views public-sector unions that contribute to political campaigns as being dangerous.

Libertarian perspective: Libertarians support repeal of all laws which impede the ability of any person to find employment. Libertarians oppose government-fostered forced retirement. Libertarians support the right of free persons to associate or not associate in labor unions, and an employer should have the right to recognize or refuse to recognize a union. Libertarians oppose government interference in bargaining, such as compulsory arbitration or imposing an obligation to bargain.
Grade: A.

Taxes: Gary Johnson wants to abolish the Internal Revenue Service and throw out the current federal tax system. He would then enact the Fair Tax to tax expenditures, rather than income, with a 'prebate' to make spending on basic necessities tax free. He claims that the Fair Tax would eliminate business taxes, withholding and other levies that penalize productivity, while creating millions of jobs. He wants to get rid of the income tax and the capital gains tax.

Libertarian perspective: All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. Libertarians call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. Libertarians oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors.
Grade: A.

Welfare/Poverty: Gary Johnson supports reducing welfare by 43% as part of his balanced budget plan. He favors imposing a gross income cap on welfare recipients. He wants to see time limits on welfare benefits.

Libertarian perspective: The proper and most effective source of help for the poor is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals. Libertarians believe members of society will become more charitable and civil society will be strengthened as government reduces its activity in this realm.
Grade: A.

Overall: Gary Johnson is a nearly ideal candidate for a libertarian voter.
Overall Grade: A.


http://www.examiner.com/article/candidate-review-gary-johnson-on-the-issues
 
Explain these claims. I asked his record. You're just making claims.
Do you like prisons? Gary built two new ones in New Mexico. Do you like private prisons? Gary privatized 1/2 of New Mexico's prisons. Do you like high taxes? During Gary Johnson's tenure as Governor of New Mexico taxes went through the roof while he claimed to lower them. Do you like being stolen from? Gary Johnson is fine with it. He tells you straight up.
Restrict Federal Reserve policy to maintaining price stability, not bailing out financial firms or propping up the housing sector.

Just like Alan Greenspan, John Maynard Keynes, and Cecil Rhodes.
"By this means government may secretly and unobserved, confiscate the wealth of the people, and not one man in a million will detect the theft." - Lord John Maynard Keynes, "Economic Consequences of Peace"

"In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists' tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the 'hidden' confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights." - Alan Greenspan, Gold and Economic Freedom

"Our goal is gradually to absorb the wealth of the world." - Cecil Rhodes, "The secret banking cabal"

What does it take for people to listen to their leaders?
 
So who is this new guy? An opposing candidate of Ron Paul, or trying to pick up power through his following?

To be honest, I do not know enough about him to criticize. So explain to me his record as a politician, and any controversial views he may have.

Some people say he doesn't support the FED, others say he does.

Well he has at least spoken out against the drug war I've read on the forum, so I'm at least interested. What is the man's record and whether or not he desrves to be "Plan B"?


I learned of him HERE, on this Board.

As a "red" governor of a "blue" state, he sailed to reelection despite vetoing more than 750 spending bills. In eight brief years in a term-limit state, he not only balanced the budget, he bequeathed a SURPLUS after inheriting a DEFICIT. No small feat.

He IS on the wrong side of privatized prisons, but I have HOPE that America's GROTESQUE-indeed-shameful prison statistics will persuade him to flop-flip.
 
I learned of him HERE, on this Board.

As a "red" governor of a "blue" state, he sailed to reelection despite vetoing more than 750 spending bills. In eight brief years in a term-limit state, he not only balanced the budget, he bequeathed a SURPLUS after inheriting a DEFICIT. No small feat.

He IS on the wrong side of privatized prisons, but I have HOPE that America's GROTESQUE-indeed-shameful prison statistics will persuade him to flop-flip.

Ha Ha. Some people will believe anything. We also went to Mars. LoL.
 
Ha Ha. Some people will believe anything. We also went to Mars. LoL.

Aye. And some people will SAY anything.


2012 Presidential White Paper #9

Former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson



INTRODUCTION

Gary Johnson was elected Governor of New Mexico in 1994, and served from 1995 to 2003. Since Johnson has never served in Congress, he does not have a rating by the Club for Growth. However, the Cato Institute, a free market think tank, produces a biennial scorecard on the nation’s governors based on their tax and spending policies and actions. Over his eight years as Governor, Gary Johnson’s scores were:

2002 – “B”
2000 – “B”
1998 – “B”
1996 – “B”


TAXES

The Club for Growth is committed to lower taxes – especially lower tax rates – across the board. Lower taxes on work, savings, and investments lead to greater levels of these activities, thus encouraging greater economic growth.

Overall, Governor Johnson has an excellent record on taxes and consistently pushed for tax cuts despite having to deal with the liberal New Mexico Legislature. Late in his second term, the Cato Institute found that Johnson was one of “four governors proposing or enacting the largest income tax rate cuts during their tenures.”

In his first term, Governor Johnson proposed reducing the top rate of the state personal income tax from 8.5% to 8%, along with other tax cuts, but was rebuffed by the Legislature. He signed a repeal of a 1993 6-cent-a-gallon tax hike. In 1997, Governor Johnson again proposed to cut the top rate, this time to 8.3%. The legislature proposed to cut it to 8.2%, but offset some of the revenue losses from this and other tax cuts with a cigarette tax increase. According to Cato, Johnson signed the income tax cut, and “vetoed the cigarette tax hike.”

Unlike some of the other Republican candidates for President this year and in past election cycles, Gary Johnson never raised the cigarette tax. While the tax on cigarettes has little relevance to economic growth, the fact that he held the line on such taxes demonstrates how strongly he opposes tax hikes. In 1999, he vetoed a 12-cent-a-pack cigarette tax hike —“not because he liked smoking, he says, but because he opposes all tax hikes.” New Mexico’s cigarette tax rate stayed the same from 1995 to 2003.

In 2001, Governor Johnson vetoed a bill to cut the top income tax rate from 8.2% to 7.7% because it also lowered the dollar amount that the top rate kicked in. His proposal would have cut the income tax by $72 million while the legislature wanted just a $32 million cut and a $30.5 million one-time rebate. Johnson later said he regretted vetoing the legislature’s version. Over the course of his two terms, Governor Johnson “cut the state income tax, the gasoline tax, the state capital gains tax, and the unemployment tax.”

As a candidate for President, Governor Johnson has indicated his support for a flat tax. He also supports eliminating the corporate income tax. He called the 2010 deal to temporarily extend the Bush tax cuts for two years “not a good one” because it didn’t make them permanent.


SPENDING

The Club for Growth is committed to reducing government spending. Less spending enhances economic growth by enabling lower taxes and diminishing the government’s economically inefficient allocation of resources.

Governor Johnson was one of the most anti-spending governors in New Mexico history.

Governor Johnson set a state record for vetoes as Governor, earning the title “Governor No” after 742 total vetoes of bills over two terms. In an interview with John Stossel on Fox News, Governor Johnson bragged that one of his veto messages was “I’m vetoing this piece of legislation because it’s just way too long and we don’t understand what it says.”

Governor Johsnon looked for private alternatives to the infrastructure spending that too often busts state budgets. For example, Highway 44 between Albuquerque and Farmington was “designed, financed, built, and guaranteed by a private company.”

In 2000, he refused to sign a budget and forced a special session with the legislature over funding priorities, a battle which ended with Johnson signing a $3.5 billion dollar budget but vetoing several small spending priorities such as $5 million on expanded Medicaid. He threatened to shut down state government when the legislature fought him and even threatened to let prisoners out of jail if the state couldn’t afford to house them.

On federal issues, Governor Johnson says he would have opposed TARP. “Government should not have been involved in this…Why should Goldman and AIG be saved but not Lehman?” He also wants to eliminate government subsidies for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. He says he would have voted against the stimulus.

He has said that he would cut the federal budget by 43%, “Start out with the big four - Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security and defense,” Johnson said in New Hampshire in early 2011.


ENTITLEMENT REFORM

America’s major middle-class entitlement programs are already insolvent. The Club for Growth supports entitlement reforms that enable personal ownership of retirement and health care programs, benefit from market returns, and diminish dependency on government.

Governor Johnson has an excellent record of holding down the exploding growth of entitlement programs that now cripple state budgets. As Governor, Johnson presided over the beginning of managed care for Medicaid recipients in New Mexico and pushed for speedy implementation. The managed care program (known as Salud!) replaces fee-for service and covers approximately two-thirds of available services under Medicaid. Salud! has generally been described as operating with “significant savings to both the State and Federal governments,” when compared to fee-for-service.

In 2000, Governor Johnson proposed to re-impose a gross income cap on welfare recipients. In 2002, Johnson proposed limiting eligibility for Medicaid from 235% of the federal poverty level down to 200% for families with children 5 and under and 100% for ages 6-18. He also let his state’s S-CHIP program expire after vetoing an attempt to make it permanent.

Governor Johnson’s website lists some major entitlement reform proposals, including:
Block grant Medicare and Medicaid funds to the states, allowing them to innovate, find efficiencies and provide better service at lower cost.
Repeal ObamaCare, as well as the failed Medicare prescription drug benefit.
Fix Social Security by changing the escalator from being based on wage growth to inflation.
Governor Johnson has also said that he would be open to personal accounts for Social Security, as well as means testing the program.


REGULATION

Excessive government regulation stymies individual and business innovation necessary for strong economic expansion. The Club for Growth supports less and more sensible government regulation as a critical step toward increasing freedom and growth in the marketplace.

In 1999, Johnson vetoed a bill which would have raised the minimum wage from $4.25 per hour to $5.65. He also signed a law deregulating New Mexico’s electricity market that allowed residential, small-business customers and schools to start shopping for their electricity supplier. He’s argued that when a Democrat negotiates with labor unions through collective bargaining it’s a “giveaway” instead of a negotiation. He says he doesn’t believe in cap-and-trade legislation, saying that “I do not believe that taxing carbon emissions is the way to go forward.” Governor Johnson also opposes so-called “Net Neutrality” regulations that would lead to a larger government role in the use of Internet bandwidth.


FREE TRADE

Free trade is a vital policy necessary for maximizing economic growth. In recent decades, America’s commitment to expanding trade has resulted in lower costs for consumers, job growth, and higher levels of productivity and innovation.

On trade, Johnson “generally supports NAFTA and other free-trade agreements,” In a June 9 segment on John Stossel’s program on Fox Business, Johnson “debated” Obama impersonator Reggie Brown and said he wanted “no tariffs, no restrictions” on trade. He did sound a little squishy on trade in a March 2011 interview when he said that “So much of the legislation that we pass isn’t really free market at all. It’s touted as free market, when the reality ends up to be very corporate. The reality ends up to be corporatism…I was always looking at business legislation from the standpoint of having it affect everyone equally as opposed to big business being further advantaged…so many of these treaties, NAFTA being one…the criticism of NAFTA should be rooted in the fact that big business became even bigger business.”


SCHOOL CHOICE

The Club for Growth supports broad school choice, including charter schools and voucher programs that create a competitive education market including public, private, religious, and non-religious schools. More competition in education will lead to higher quality and lower costs.

Governor Johnson has a consistent record of support for school choice and vouchers. Governor Johnson proposed giving every student in the entire state of New Mexico vouchers worth $3,500. He once compared the program to child-care vouchers, saying “For those mothers who are on welfare, we give them what in essence is a voucher which allows them to choose where to send their children to child care, and in many cases that child care is religious. That's a state-funded program. We don't call it a voucher but it might just as well be called a voucher.”

He supports eliminating the Department of Education and wants universal school choice.


TORT REFORM

The American economy suffers from excessive litigation which increases the cost of doing business and slows economic growth. The Club for Growth supports major reforms to our tort system to restore a more just and less costly balance in tort litigation.

Governor Johnson formed a task force aimed at limiting punitive damage awards in 1996. He also supported the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act that toughened liability standards for securities litigation.


POLITICAL FREE SPEECH

Maximizing prosperity requires sound government policies. When government strays from these policies, citizens must be free to exercise their constitutional rights to petition and criticize those policies and the politicians responsible for them.

In a January 2001 interview with Playboy Magazine, Governor Johnson stated that he opposed campaign contribution limits. “The problem isn't large contributions. The problem is that we don't know who contributed. In New Mexico, there's no limit on what I can receive from anyone, but I have to disclose it all--with the exception of soft money,” said Johnson. “If you limit contributions from an individual to, say, $1000, then I think just the opposite occurs. Then you have politicians beholden to way too many people.” In 2010, Johnson said he favored unlimited contributions by corporations as well.


POLITICAL ACTIVITY & ENDORSEMENTS

Robust political activity is essential to producing a federal government that is more respectful of free markets and produces more pro-economic growth policies. The Club for Growth’s PAC has been active in some of the more central battles within the Republican Party nominating process in recent years, supporting pro-growth candidates over pro-government ones.

Govenror Johnson has a very limited endorsement history. He endorsed Ron Paul for President on January 21st, 2008. He endorsed Steve Forbes for President in 2000.


SUMMATION

As John Stossel noted in a recent column, Gary Johnson “was missing from last week's Republican presidential debate, and that's too bad. He's an announced candidate who was a two-term governor of New Mexico, and he makes a case for strongly limited government.” Until or unless Johnson rises in the polls, people may not hear Johnson’s views in future Republican primary debates either.

With few exceptions, Governor Johnson’s tenure as New Mexico’s Governor and his public record since that time has revealed a generally pro-growth attitude. We are slightly concerned that, like fellow libertarian Congressman Ron Paul, that he may harbor anti-free trade sentiments. Governor Johnson deserves special praise for his consistent use of his veto-pen as Governor. We believe that Governor Johnson would most likely be a pro-growth President if elected.



http://www.clubforgrowth.org/whitepapers/?subsec=137&id=936
 
After College he built a construction company from scratch to one of the largest construction companies in the state employing over 1000 people, after which he sold his company and ran for Governor of New Mexico
As Governor:
-cut taxes 14 times (annually $123 million)
-vetoed over 750 bills
-cut the rate of government growth in half
-reduced welfare spending 30%, balanced the budget
-eliminated the state's deficit
-Publicly called for the legalization of marijuana (becoming the highest ranking elected official to do so)

-privatized half of the state prisons (saved state money, Travlyr will be happy to tell you all about it ;))

-He increased the budget for the state's education system
-signed a $1.2 billion highway improvement package to upgrade 500 miles of state roads.

In 2008 Ron Paul asked for his endorsement and he gave it readily.
Initially ran as a Republican, but do to arbitrary exclusion from the polls and therefore all but two of the debates, after which he switched to the LP.
While he is personally pro-choice he believes the decision ought to be a state issue and would nominate judges that would rule according to original intent, conversely he believes the right to marriage is protected by the 14th amendment under the equal protection clause.
He supports the implementing the FairTax, and promises to submit a balanced budget to congress for 2013 that cuts across the board ($1.4 Trillion in total cuts I believe)

Most controversially, (for the people on this board I mean) while he does claims be "non-interventist, but not isolationist." he sometimes goes back and forth on what sort of involvement we should have in foreign affairs, particularly in involving military forces for humanitarian reasons.

In terms of the Fed, he's said he'd end it if congress passed legislation to do so, but stresses that ending the Fed by itself will not change monetary policy as the treasury would then just print money. He is fully supportive of auditing the Fed and getting them under control, (ie get them to stop printing money and all the QE)

his site has all his stances on all the major issues:
http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/front
This site gives a fairly decent over view of what he's done:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Gary_E._Johnson
 
Actually I'm interested in Ending The Fed and enjoying Freedom.


Do you attribute Ron Paul's back-peddling from END THE FED (as his famous his book is entitled) to AUDIT THE FED (as his watered-down bill is entitled) to a compromise of principles for political expedience, or to a change of heart that now embraces continued-but-more-controlled existence of The Fed?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top