Eugenicist Takes Hostage at Discovery Channel, Issues Anti-human Manifesto

[Icymudpuppy]

So if a mother is on welfare and can't on her own make ends meet to feed her child, is assisting her "artificial support"?

Good question. If she has established a social network that is willing to voluntarily support her, that is a group survival function demonstrated throughout the animal kingdom. Voluntary support from genetically or culturally similar group members for her proven ability to contribute young to that group is evolutionarily sound.

Involuntary support for a women who is not contributing to the mutual success of a group is not a strategy for success.

I'm all for that, which is why I advocate abortion most of the time.

What's more responsible than a person who knows he/she can't afford to take care of their child and ends the deal ASAP?

It may sound more harsh than abortion, but I think she should have all the same opportunities that a wild animal gets. Nobody asks if an Opossum mother is suitable or advocates abortion for opossum babies because she can't support them all, but we also don't shed a tear when 60% of her young starve to death from lack of nutrients in the first month after birth.

 

[WaltM]

Good question. If she has established a social network that is willing to voluntarily support her, that is a group survival function demonstrated throughout the animal kingdom. Voluntary support from genetically or culturally similar group members for her proven ability to contribute young to that group is evolutionarily sound.

Involuntary support for a women who is not contributing to the mutual success of a group is not a strategy for success.

Glad we agree, sadly many people here are not willing to be honest about it.

When asked, should a child be starved dead, they always say "that'll never happen in a free society".

It may sound more harsh than abortion, but I think she should have all the same opportunities that a wild animal gets. Nobody asks if an Opossum mother is suitable or advocates abortion for opossum babies because she can't support them all, but we also don't shed a tear when 60% of her young starve to death from lack of nutrients in the first month after birth.

it IS more harsh than abortion, I appreciate your honesty and I wish others who claim holier than thou would at least be such consistent.

 

[WaltM]

Best post you've made in a while...

Although, I think there's some debate to be had as to whether it was federal tyranny/ambush. It does look like they were set up.

Even if it was an ambush, whether they're actually criminal is up for investigation, not our denial.

(Of course, some people can disagree with the law and say what they do is moral though illegal, but those people shy off when somebody's arrested)

But, if they were dumb enough to be set up.....

(And yeah, I know you were trying to set me up....)

I think you get my point, it wasn't at all about defending Hutaree or blaming the government, it's about people being in denial of associations, and wouldn't allow the same for their adversaries.

 

[awake]

This individual believed that time was up for humans and that he was starting a revolution to save the world from over breeders and climate deniers. Wonder where he got those ideas?

 

[FrankRep]

This individual believed that time was up for humans and that he was starting a revolution to save the world from over breeders and climate deniers. Wonder where he got those ideas?

'Awakened' by Al Gore's 'An Inconvenient Truth'...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38957020/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/

 

[WaltM]

This individual believed that time was up for humans and that he was starting a revolution to save the world from over breeders and climate deniers. Wonder where he got those ideas?

not from eugenicists who believe selective breeding for a better future, and survival of humans through education and technology.

or maybe he did, and chose more coercive and immediate action.

 

[Monarchist]

not from eugenicists who believe selective breeding for a better future, and survival of humans through education and technology.

or maybe he did, and chose more coercive and immediate action.

Tell us about your super genes.

 

[FrankRep]

not from eugenicists who believe selective breeding for a better future, and survival of humans through education and technology.

China Pushes Carbon Reduction Through Eugenics Population Reduction
YouTube - China Pushes Carbon Reduction Through Eugenics Population Reduction

 

[Austrian Econ Disciple]

Cue SPLC in 5....4...3...2...1... Not!

Everyone who is in favor of Eugenics I nominate them for the first ones to be killed. Sound fair?

 

[awake]

not from eugenicists who believe selective breeding for a better future, and survival of humans through education and technology.

or maybe he did, and chose more coercive and immediate action.

Dog breeders share the same outlook on things chasing after blue ribbons. He referred to other human beings with near virus quality; " stopping the human race from breeding any more disgusting human babies".

His choice of selective breeding is quite striking, simply stop all humans from reproducing, render the species sterile through some form of violent threat.

Another quite striking note is that he intrinsically values all animal life over human, which is at the core of the environmentalist ideology.

 

[WaltM]

Cue SPLC in 5....4...3...2...1... Not!

Everyone who is in favor of Eugenics I nominate them for the first ones to be killed. Sound fair?

anyone who opposes death penalty I nominate him to be a victim, sound fair?

 

[WaltM]

Tell us about your super genes.

I have none, and I'm honest enough to admit it.

I'm not handicapped, and I'm relatively healthier than most people, but I have made a responsible choice to not breed (and I find it criminal that some people breed solely for their pleasure and abuse of society)

 

[Austrian Econ Disciple]

anyone who opposes death penalty I nominate him to be a victim, sound fair?

So you aren't a problem to the Earth, but everyone else is..fucking coward. Everyone who believes in Eugenics and this balogne should go and off themselves if they truly believed in it...or is it that they are like a Cult and won't kill themselves until everyone else is dead? Drinking the punch last is it?

 

[James Madison]

I have made a responsible choice to not breed

Why do you feel this way?

 

[WaltM]

China Pushes Carbon Reduction Through Eugenics Population Reduction

Population reduction isn't always eugenics.

Eugenics may result in population reduction, and it may use population reduction as a means, but they are not equatable or synonymous.

Furthermore, carbon reduction doesn't require population reduction per se either.

Of course, like I said earlier in this thread, I can't expect you to stop connecting these dots because that's the purpose of your life, to make anybody other than a Ron Paul supporter, JBS member and Creationist, look like a bad guy.

Unless you're an anarchist, you'd be a hypocrite for not admitting China has policies and regulations you might accept.

 

[WaltM]

Why do you feel this way?

Mostly financial reasons.

I'm too selfish to waste time and money on children.

There's also other factors such as my contribution to society, belief that I'm not the best genes, and the realization there's more people than I need to care about.

 

[WaltM]

So you aren't a problem to the Earth, but everyone else is..fucking coward.

You're not different.

You believe all humans are bad unless they're an ancap like you.

You're just too coward to say you'd rather have them dead (or be your slave) if you could.

Everyone who believes in Eugenics and this balogne should go and off themselves if they truly believed in it...or is it that they are like a Cult and won't kill themselves until everyone else is dead? Drinking the punch last is it?

You can keep spewing ad hominems, falsehoods which I've corrected, or you can actually listen to what I believe.

I don't believe all humans are equally good or bad, so not all humans are worthy to live, or to kill. Therefore, myself is not always a good start.

In contrast, people can start with themselves if they believe they are harm to others, even if they believe others are fine.

 

[Monarchist]

Mostly financial reasons.

I'm too selfish to waste time and money on children.

There's also other factors such as my contribution to society, belief that I'm not the best genes, and the realization there's more people than I need to care about.

Fascinating.

 

[James Madison]

Mostly financial reasons.

I'm too selfish to waste time and money on children.

There's also other factors such as my contribution to society, belief that I'm not the best genes, and the realization there's more people than I need to care about.

Odd that you seem to expouse darwinian principles with such conviction and yet don't adhere to the most important evolutionary drive of all: reproduction.

 

[awake]

I have none, and I'm honest enough to admit it.

I'm not handicapped, and I'm relatively healthier than most people, but I have made a responsible choice to not breed (and I find it criminal that some people breed solely for their pleasure and abuse of society)

"..and I find it criminal that some people breed solely for their pleasure and abuse of society"

Then by all means have those people who might find pleasure in sexual intercourse rendered sterile by force. Ensure all those who would try to birth offspring in hopes of collecting a more sizable welfare check rounded up right away and made sterile as well.

But don't stop there, you already conceded the principle that another human being has a right to his own body as property of himself... you might as well follow through, round up the other social undesirables.