Enoch & the Watchers: The Real Story of Angels & Demons

Is really interesting that whenever we mention these missing books that the mud slinging starts. Specifically the Book of Enoch. Gives credence to why they are omitted in the first place. Or, more cearly, who did the omitting.
 
Is really interesting that whenever we mention these missing books that the mud slinging starts. Specifically the Book of Enoch. Gives credence to why they are omitted in the first place. Or, more cearly, who did the omitting.

Clearly, it's aliens disguised as leprechauns, of course.
 
Is really interesting that whenever we mention these missing books that the mud slinging starts. Specifically the Book of Enoch. Gives credence to why they are omitted in the first place. Or, more cearly, who did the omitting.

The RCC, picked and chose and decided what is scripture and what is not, as part of the Empire highjacking.

That's why the NT has 13 books written by Paul (ahem). :rolleyes:
 
Thank you for your very typical totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?

How was that off topic? We were discussing the exclusion of the Book of Enoch, and here is a Christian Church that lists it in its canon. If you prefer, I can go back to posting alien videos.
 
How was that off topic? We were discussing the exclusion of the Book of Enoch, and here is a Christian Church that lists it in its canon. If you prefer, I can go back to posting alien videos.

Thank you for your very typical totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?
 
The RCC, picked and chose and decided what is scripture and what is not, as part of the Empire highjacking.

That's why the NT has 13 books written by Paul (ahem). :rolleyes:

This is factually not true. Not even Roman Catholics, who believe the same thing as Ronin does about this, can defend it factually.
 
Sola_Fide
This message is hidden because Sola_Fide is on your ignore list.


Thank you for your very typical totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?
 
Not even Roman Catholics, who believe the same thing as Ronin does about this, can defend it factually.

I'm not sure what you think Roman Catholics believe that is similar to Ronin's belief in this thread.
 
Ronin,,why can you not at least honestly debate and defend your position?

The debate (your debate) is not on the existence of angels (whether good or evil) as much as the nature of of those beings.

and that is where we disagree.
 
Ronin,,why can you not at least honestly debate and defend your position?

The debate (your debate) is not on the existence of angels (whether good or evil) as much as the nature of of those beings.

and that is where we disagree.
This is not a debating forum. What is my position, in your mind?
 
Ronin,,why can you not at least honestly debate and defend your position?

The debate (your debate) is not on the existence of angels (whether good or evil) as much as the nature of of those beings.

and that is where we disagree.

Not sure how one can honestly debate and defend a position when they are immediately mocked and called names. (And that's not about you, personally)

The Book of Enoch is very interesting but it is impossible to talk or debate about such things here. Peace through Religion and all that. ;)
 
Not sure how one can honestly debate and defend a position when they are immediately mocked and called names. (And that's not about you, personally)

The Book of Enoch is very interesting but it is impossible to talk or debate about such things here. Peace through Religion and all that. ;)

Correct.

And debating requires much more typing than I am ever interested or willing to do.
 
Not sure how one can honestly debate and defend a position when they are immediately mocked and called names.

Like being called a Satanic Paulinist? It's less the subject matter and more the technique. Obviously the OP is after a reaction rather than debate or discussion, as he has admitted many times. So I'm humoring him.

If you or Pete want to open a serious discussion on this. I'll lurk but read with interest.
 
Like being called a Satanic Paulinist? It's less the subject matter and more the technique. Obviously the OP is after a reaction rather than debate or discussion, as he has admitted many times. So I'm humoring him.

If you or Pete want to open a serious discussion on this. I'll lurk but read with interest.
That wasn't immediately, you really had to work for it and earn it.
 
Back
Top